Cretolixon Lohrmann, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5194/fr-23-215-2020 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3650519D-0470-42E2-97D7-A267658C0B4F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/47D641BE-A9C1-4ED2-BE34-BA0D20B1766B |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:47D641BE-A9C1-4ED2-BE34-BA0D20B1766B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cretolixon Lohrmann |
status |
gen. nov. |
Genus Cretolixon Lohrmann gen. nov.
LSID (genus): urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:47D641BE-A9C1-4ED2-BE34-BA0D20B1766B
LSID (author): urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:05A758C9-462A-422C-B8D6-DD9530E2BD05
Type species: Cretolixon alatum Lohrmann sp. nov.
Diagnosis
Among the rhopalosomatid genera, Cretolixon is unique in showing the following character combination: fully developed wings ( Figs. 4–7 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 View Figure 6 View Figure 7 ; Olixon spp. are brachypterous or apterous), hind wing vein M and Cu diverging far beyond cu-a ( Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ; distad by at least the length of cu-a; in Eorhopalosoma the hind wing vein M and Cu diverge near the cross vein cu-a), occipital carina present ( Fig. 4c View Figure 4 ; absent in Liosphex ), maxillary palpomere 3 with a distinct apical bristle ( Fig. 8b View Figure 8 ; absent in Eorhopalosoma , Liosphex , Paniscomima , and Rhopalosoma ), labial palpomere 2 with a distinct apical bristle ( Fig. 8c View Figure 8 ; absent in Eorhopalosoma , most Rhopalosoma , and Olixon ) each, moderately small ocelli (OOD about 3.0 times LOD; Figs. 4b View Figure 4 , 5b View Figure 5 , 6b View Figure 6 ; minute in Olixon , large to very large in Eorhopalosoma , Rhopalosoma , and Paniscomima except for P. seyrigi ), and slightly concave inner eye margin ( Fig. 4b View Figure 4 ; deeply emarginated or notched in Eorhopalosoma , Liosphex , Paniscomima , and Rhopalosoma ).
Additionally, females of Cretolixon can be easily identified by the six apical bristles on the first flagellomere ( Figs. 5b View Figure 5 , 6e View Figure 6 , 8a View Figure 8 ) – the maximum number of apical bristles on flagellomere I in any other known rhopalosomatid wasp is two (as in Fig. 3a, d View Figure 3 ).
Description
Male
Head. Labial palpus four-segmented, basal three palpomeres each distinctly shorter than fourth segment. Labial palpomere 2 with thin apical bristle, less prominent than on maxillary palpomere 3 (as in Fig. 8b, c View Figure 8 ). Maxillary palpus six-segmented, basal three palpomeres distinctly shorter than apical three palpomeres and slightly broadening
224 V. Lohrmann et al.: † Cretolixon – a remarkable new genus of rhopalosomatid wasps towards apex. Maxillary palpomere 3 with distinct apical bristle (as in Fig. 8b, c View Figure 8 ). Free margin of clypeus slightly concave. Ventral margin of labrum convex, obtusely angled. Mandible quadri/tridentate? (a fourth tooth may be present; however, the perspective makes a validation impossible), its apical teeth infuscate. Scapus clavate. FI conical, FII–X more or less cylindrical, FXI apically pointed. FI with two prominent apical bristles, FII–VI each with a single prominent apical bristle ( Fig. 4d View Figure 4 ). Longer bristle on FI almost as long as flagellomere. FI shorter than FII, which is the longest flagellomere. FIII–X becoming sequentially shorter from base to apex. FXI slightly longer than FX. FI 3.0×, FII 3.3×, and FVII 2.8× as long as wide. Inner eye margin slightly concave at level of antenna (but not deeply emarginate; Fig. 4b View Figure 4 ). Frons protruding above antennae, with two anterad projections overlapping insertion of antennae. Ocelli moderately small ( Fig. 4b View Figure 4 ). TL 2.0×, OOD 3.0×, MOD 1.0× LOD. Ocellar triangle infuscate ( Fig. 4b View Figure 4 ). Occipital carina present ( Fig. 4c View Figure 4 ). Occiput concave ( Fig. 4c View Figure 4 ).
Mesosoma. Pronotum rather long, anterad strongly narrowing in dorsal view, dorsal posterior margin strongly concave. Notaulus apparently absent. Parapsidal sulcus straight, slightly longer than half of mesoscutal length, reaching posterior mesoscutal margin. Mesosternal lobes present, separated from mesosternum by slight depression (but not constricted as in Paniscomima and Rhopalosoma ). Metapleuralpropodeal suture carinate ( Fig. 4c View Figure 4 ). Propodeum with median slightly longitudinal tubercle on anterior section. Dorsal face of propodeum in lateral view convexly rounded.
Legs. Fore leg with one tibial spur. Middle and hind legs with two tibial spurs each, inner spur of hind leg modified as calcar. Tarsomeres I–IV each with plantar lobe. Pretarsal claws bifid. Arolium present.
Fore wing. With eight enclosed cells: C, R, 1Cu, 1R1, 2R1, 1Rs, 1M, and 2Cu ( Figs. 4e View Figure 4 , 7 View Figure 7 ). Costal cell very narrow, over complete distance narrower than bordering veins. Pterostigma narrow. Cell 2R1 (marginal cell) short, ending well before apex of wing. Base of vein M + Cu neither tubular nor present as remnant. Vein cu-a slightly curved, distad of M 1 by 1.0× length of cu-a. Vein M 1 curved, intersecting vein Cu at an angle of almost 90 ◦. Vein 1m-cu straight. Faint remnant of vein 2m-cu received by distal section of second submarginal cell (1Rs). Vein Rs 1 almost straight, about 1.7× length of M 2. Cell 1Rs 2.1× as long as high. Vein CuA distinct, CuP barely present but very short and inconspicuous. Anal lobe without adventitious vein. Wing membrane covered and ventral margin fringed with short, evenly distributed setae.
Hind wing. With two complete cells: R and Cu ( Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ). Costal cell only present as membranous area anterior to Sc + R, not enclosed by C. Jugal lobe absent. Anal vein tubular and pigmented, ending at cu-a. Sc + R tubular and pigmented, at basal two-thirds fused with C. Vein R tubular not reaching further than distal hamuli. Vein Rs tubular, straight and slightly reclivous at basal section (Rs ∗), distal section not tubular but weakly pigmented; pigmentation distally fading. Vein M + Cu tubular and slightly pigmented. Vein Cu not tubular but markedly pigmented, not reaching distal half of wing membrane. Vein M basally tubular but not pigmented, diverging from vein M + Cu by its length beyond cu-a, ending even before connecting with r-m. Vein cu- a oblique, tubular but not pigmented. Five to six basal hamuli straight, their length continuously increasing distad. Five to six distal hamuli. Distal hamuli curved, hook-shaped; similar in size and form. Wing membrane covered and ventral margin fringed with short, evenly distributed setae.
Metasoma. Segment I less than 1.5× as long as wide. Posterior half of tergite I with median depression broadening posterad. Cercus paddle-shaped and with apical setae. Parameres spine-like, upcurved.
Pilosity. Body completely covered with fine pubescence. Pubescence on metasoma slightly longer than on rest of body.
Female
Head, mesosoma, and metasoma as in male except the following: maxillary palpomeres 2 and 3 each with apical stiff bristle. FI very short, about same length as pedicel and onefifth the length of FII. FI 1.1×, FII 3.9×, and FVII 2.9× as long as wide. FI with six prominent apical bristles along inner margin ( Figs. 5b View Figure 5 , 6e View Figure 6 , 8a View Figure 8 ), longest bristle (on dorsal side) almost as long as FII, shortest bristle (on ventral side) only as long as FI. FII and FIII with a single prominent apical bristle. TL 2.0×, OOD 2.5×, MOD 1.1× LOD. Fore wing vein Rs 1 about 1.6× length of M 2. Hind wing with six basal and six distal hamuli. All legs with tarsomere I cylindrical, tarsomeres II–IV dorsoventrally flattened, laterally widened, and distally slightly broadening. Distal margin of tarsomere IV bilobed ( Fig. 5d View Figure 5 ). Tarsomeres ventrally with dense short erect setae. Tarsomeres without plantar lobes and tarsal fenestrae. Tarsomeres I–III with apicolateral bristles. Pretarsal claws simple, without preapical teeth. Arolium large. Sting upcurved.
Etymology
The new genus group name is a combination of “ cret -” (referring to Cretaceous) and the name of the recent genus Olixon . The name is neuter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.