Eumecognathus Ashe, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1002.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF168D2B-1024-43FA-BA46-4E14BD5C7DE0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E78796-FFED-FFCA-316C-F9CBFE1AC9DD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eumecognathus Ashe |
status |
gen. nov. |
Eumecognathus Ashe View in CoL , new genus
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 4–13 View FIGURES 4–8 View FIGURES 9–13 )
Type species. Eumecognathus tasmaniensis Ashe View in CoL , here designated.
Diagnosis. This genus can be easily recognized by the combination of: 445 tarsal segmentation; the extremely long mandibles with greatly reduced prostheca, and a semicircular lobate internal base ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4–8 ); the transverse labrum with greatly reduced setation, but one pair of anterolateral setae extremely long and whiplike ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4–8 ); the distinctive labium ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–8 ), with elongate, entire ligula, 2 discal setae, punctures of discal setae very close, and narrow medial pseudopore field without pseudopores; relatively short antenna with antennomeres 4–10 transverse ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–13 ); and transverse head and pronotum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
Description. Body generalized, slender, moreorless parallelsided, moderately flattened ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Length 2.2–2.4 mm. Head, pronotum and elytra uniformly covered with fine punctures, short, yellowish setae, and reticulate microsculpture, surfaces appearing slightly asperate, abdomen obsoletely reticulate, surface glossy. Head transverse, 1.3 times as wide as long (width measured immediately behind eyes), antennal fossae distant from anterior margin by greater than width of fossa; eyes moderate in size, length less than length of temples behind eyes; temples behind eyes broadly rounded to base of head; neck absent; infraorbital carina present, moderately well developed; Antenna ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–13 ) moderately short; known species with article 4 subquadrate, 5–10 transverse, 11 about as long as 9–10 together.
Labrum ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4–8 ) transverse, separated from anterior margin of mentum by broad membranous area; setation reduced except one pair of anterolateral setae very long and whiplike, oriented posteriorly in preserved specimens. Epipharynx as in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4–8 . Mandibles ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4–8 ) with very long, curved and slender apices, right and left similar except right with very slight lobe in position of medial tooth; prostheca greatly reduced with few small teeth basally and ciliate margin apically. Maxilla as in Fig. 7 View FIGURES 4–8 ; galea slightly longer than lacinia in repose; apex of galea with membranous lobe, lobe densely covered with rows of short subspinose setae; anterior 1/5 of inner face of galea with row of long setae; lacinia with inner face of long spines and spinose setae; maxillary palpi 4articled, article 3 slender, broadest near apex, about 1.3 times as long as article 2, article 2 relatively short, subequal in length to width of apex of article 3. Labium as in Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–8 ; ligula entire, rounded at apex, slender, about 2/3 length of labial palpus 1; 2 discal setae present, bases close, separated by about width of setal pore; medial pseudopore field narrow, without pseudopores; lateral pseudopore fields each with setose pore, 2 real pores, and about 6–7 pseudopores. Labial palpi 3articled, first article almost as long as next 2 together, article 2 about 2/5 length of 1, article 3 about 1.4 times length of 2, with 2 leaflike sensory appendages apically.
Pronotum transverse, 1.5–1.6 times as wide as long in known species; uniformly covered with short, yellowish microsetae, without conspicuous macrosetae; microsetae directed posteriorly in midline and posterolaterad laterally of midline; microsculpture moderately prominent, reticulate. Hypomera narrowly visible in lateral aspect. Elytra about 1.2 times as long as pronotum; posterolateral margins sinuate. Meso and metasternum as in Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–13 ; mesosternum carinate medially in basal half, carina fading on base of mesosternal process; mesocoxal cavities fully margined behind; mesosternal process long, slender, pointed apically, extended beyond middle of mesocoxal cavities; metasternal process short, broadly rounded, not attaining mesosternal process, isthmus long; known species with mesosternal process: isthmus: metasternal process in ratio of 6:2:1.4. Tarsal segmentation 445.
Abdomen parallelsided, rounded apically. Known species with terga III–IV with moderate, V with slight and VI with inconspicuous basal transverse depressions. Setation moderate with fine yellowish short microsetae, integument of known species with obsolete microsetae, surface glossy.
Secondary sexual features: none obvious except males with anterior half of sternum VII with broad band of densely arranged micropores, and with sternum VIII very slightly produced as a triangular lobe.
Etymology. The genus name is a combination of the Greek adjective “eumekes” meaning “of good length” and the Greek noun “gnathos” (feminine) meaning “jaw” ( Brown 1956). It refers to the long, slender mandibles that characterize this genus. Gen der: feminine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.