Poulinea lepidochelicola Majewska, De Stefano & Van de Vijver, 2015

Majewska, Roksana, Kociolek, J. P., Thomas, Evan W., Stefano, Mario De, Santoro, Mario, Bolaños, Federico & Vijver, Bart Van De, 2015, Chelonicola and Poulinea, two new gomphonemoid diatom genera (Bacillariophyta) living on marine turtles from Costa Rica, Phytotaxa 233 (3), pp. 236-250 : 243-247

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.233.3.2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E587D8-5D39-FFCF-4A8F-FB27FCEEC492

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Poulinea lepidochelicola Majewska, De Stefano & Van de Vijver
status

sp. nov.

Poulinea lepidochelicola Majewska, De Stefano & Van de Vijver , sp. nov. ( Figs 13–31 View FIGURES 13–20 View FIGURES 21–25 View FIGURES 26–31 )

Frustules wedge-shaped in girdle view showing conspicuous septa at both poles. One valve slightly concave while other valve flat. Valves small, heteropolar, typically clavate with acutely rounded, non-protracted headpole and footpole. Septa visible in LM and SEM on both poles. Valve dimensions (n=50): length 5.2–10.0 μm, width 1.6–2.8 μm. Axial area very narrow, not discernible in LM. Central area forming a wide fascia. Raphe filiform, curved with expanded proximal raphe endings. Distal raphe endings not discernible in LM, typically covered by a silica flap on both poles, only visible in SEM. Striae weakly radiate near the central area, almost parallel throughout the rest of the valve, very faintly visible in LM, 25–36 in 10 μm, composed of only two, transapically elongated areolae, only discernible in SEM.

Type:— COSTA RICA. Olive ridley sea turtle, 9º 59’ 23.7” N, 85º 41’ 52.6” W, M. De Stefano, 27 October 2013 (holotype BR! stub 4421).

Scanning Electron Microscopy: —( Figs 13–31 View FIGURES 13–20 View FIGURES 21–25 View FIGURES 26–31 ) Frustules heterovalvar, wedge-shaped in girdle view ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13–20 ), attached by the footpole to the substrate by a mucilaginous pad ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 13–20 ). Valve face flat in one valve and slightly concave in the other ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13–20 ). Valve face gently sloping towards the mantle margin ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Mantle height largest near the valve middle becoming shallower towards both poles ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 13–20 , 26 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Pseudosepta absent ( Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Axial area narrow, linear, narrowing towards the apices ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Central area small, forming a rectangular fascia that widens towards the valve margins ( Figs 21, 24 View FIGURES 21–25 , 26, 27 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Occasionally shortened striae present in the central area ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 13–20 , 21 View FIGURES 21–25 ). External raphe branches differing in length with branch in upper half (headpole) shorter than in lower halve of the valve ( Figs 16 View FIGURES 13–20 , 21 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Branches almost straight to curving ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 21–25 ). External proximal raphe endings spatulate, unilaterally weakly deflected ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Distal raphe fissures elongated, unilaterally bent, terminating near the valve poles, covered on the headpole and footpole by silica flaps, conspicuously thickened on the footpole ( Figs 21–23 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Striae uniseriate, equally spaced on most of the valve, but somewhat denser near the poles ( Figs 21–23 View FIGURES 21–25 ), composed of 1–2 (very rarely 3, Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 26–31 ) transapically elongated areolae ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Both rows of areolae separated by a larger hyaline area, formed by the valve face/mantle junction ( Figs 25 View FIGURES 21–25 , 26 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Apical pore field absent on both poles, but one series of elongated areolae surrounding the distal raphe ending present at the footpole ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 21–25 ). Internally, raphe straight, located on a raised raphe sternum ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Proximal raphe endings covered by a silica flap ( Figs 30, 31 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Evident in oblique view, proximal raphe endings terminating on a slightly raised central nodule ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Distal raphe endings straight, terminating on weakly developed helictoglossae ( Figs 28, 29 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Areolae internally slightly sunken between interstriae, covered by hymenes located in the middle of the areolar canal ( Figs 28–30 View FIGURES 26–31 ). Cingulum composed of a large number (up to 12) of open copulae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 13–20 ), each with one row of apically elongated, slit-like poroids in the advalvar position ( Figs 15–18 View FIGURES 13–20 ). Near the footpole, a double row of poroids often present on the copulae ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13–20 , arrow). First band, the valvocopula, with a small, but distinct septum at the head pole ( Figs 19 & 20 View FIGURES 13–20 ). Second copula with a small septum at the footpole ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 13–20 ). Other copulae lacking a septum.

Etymology:—The specific epithet lepidochelicola refers to the habitat of the new species, living (Latin - cola) on

Lepidochelys olivacea .

Phylogenetic analysis

A total of four most parsimonious trees of 97 steps was recovered in the cladistics analysis. From these four trees, a strict consensus tree was computed and is presented in figure 32 and had a consistency index of 0.443 3 and retention index of 0.597 0. The strict consensus tree shows a monophyletic clade with Chelonicola sister to Poulinea . This group is sister to Cuneolus , and together that group of three genera is sister to Tripterion . Other taxa suggested to be part of the Rhoicopheniaceae are found in widely divergent places in the tree, either sister to gomphonemoid diatoms ( Rhoicosphenia and Gomphoseptatum ) or ‘monoraphid’ diatoms (Gomphonemopsi s and Gomphosphenia are sisters and then related to a clade of Achnanthidium and Cocconeis ).

BR

Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collection

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF