Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.665 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:836C9171-0849-4F4D-BC8D-90C2D9E8B9D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14370887 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E58799-FFB7-AF79-FE07-FBF1FD6DFA0E |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015 |
status |
|
Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015 View in CoL
Figs 3 View Fig , 23G View Fig , 50 View Fig
Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015: 47 View in CoL , fig. 2.
“ Isotriphora ” sp. View in CoL – Zhang 2011: 99, fig. 296.
Material examined
Holotype
GUADELOUPE • Port-Louis , Grand Cul-de-Sac Marin; depth 81 m; MNHN IM-2000-30472 .
Other material
BRAZIL – Amapá • 12 specs; 03º58′43″ N, 49º33′24″ W; 2001; MNRJ 32558 View Materials GoogleMaps * • 2 specs; 03º58′43″ N, 49º33′24″ W; 2001; MNRJ 32556 View Materials GoogleMaps * • 1 spec.; 03º58′43″ N, 49º33′24″ W; 2001; MNRJ 32563 View Materials GoogleMaps * • 1 spec.; 03º58′43″ N, 49º33′24″ W; 2001; MNRJ 32569 View Materials GoogleMaps * • 1 spec.; 03º58′43″ N, 49º33′24″ W 2001; MNRJ 32574 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1 spec.; 02º45′ N, 48º42′ W; depth 75 m; Nov. 2008; MNRJ 17929 View Materials GoogleMaps * • 1 spec.; 02º21′12″ N, 48º29′54″ W; depth 72 m; Mar. 1997; MORG 52263 GoogleMaps .
Description
Shell sinistral, small, cyrtoconoid, rectilinear profile, up to 4.6 mm long, 1.4 mm wide, length/width ratio 2.8 to 3.1, up to 11 whorls. Protoconch paucispiral with truncated apex, without clear differentiation of the teleoconch; two strongly nodulose spiral cords starting from the slightly pointed and very narrow nucleus, situated at ~37% and ~73% of the last whorl height; median spiral cord usually emerging in the fifth whorl of the shell, sometimes as early as the end of fourth whorl or as late as the end of the sixth whorl, and readily reaching the same size of other cords; on the body whorl, distance between spiral cords is 0.9–1.2 × higher than width of cords; 17–20 orthocline to slightly opisthocline axial ribs at seventh whorl of shell; rounded to slightly elliptical nodules of medium size; distinct and welldeveloped suture, with small sutural cord; wavy subperipheral cord, mainly not developing nodules, two thin and nearly smooth basal cords, abapical one almost indistinct in some cases; no supranumerical cords; ovate aperture, 0.55–0.62 mm long, 0.47–0.50 mm wide, length/width ratio 1.2; anterior canal curved backwards/downwards, short, open or partly closed by projection of outer lip, 0.24–0.30 mm long, 0.14–0.17 mm wide, length/width ratio 1.7–1.8; posterior canal is small sinus, 0.09–0.11 mm long,
not detached from aperture. Two to three initial whorls white, remaining whorls homogeneously cream or light brown; worn shells dirty white.
Remarks
As indicated in the original description, the shell of I. tricingulata superficially resembles that of Isotriphora peetersae ( Moolenbeek & Faber, 1989) , a species widely distributed throughout the Caribbean ( Moolenbeek & Faber 1989; Rolán & Espinosa 1994; Redfern 2013). However, I. peetersae is differentiated by a somewhat bottle-shaped shell, the presence of three spiral cords through most of the protoconch, a late median spiral cord of the teleoconch, the white coloration comprising the five initial whorls of the shell (but only two to three whorls in I. tricingulata , Fig. 3 View Fig A–D) and a darker brown coloration in the remaining whorls.
Isotriphora tricingulata is also easily distinguished from Isotriphora onca Fernandes, Pimenta & Leal, 2013 , from the Vitória-Trindade Seamount Chain (southeastern Brazil), by the presence of an evident median spiral cord emerging in the fifth/sixth whorl ( Fig. 3F View Fig ), but only with a very reduced size after the 13 th whorl in I. onca ( Fernandes et al. 2013) . The shell of I. onca is more elongated, with a long and almost closed anterior canal, instead of the short and open or partly closed anterior canal of I. tricingulata ( Fig. 3H View Fig ).
The single difference between the holotype of I. tricingulata and shells from Brazil is the earlier emergence of the median spiral cord in the holotype (fourth whorl vs usually fifth whorl in shells from Brazil). Despite the supposed intracapsular metamorphosis suggested by protoconch morphology ( Fig. 3I View Fig ), different populations of this species may be connected by the stepping stones of the Lesser Antilles and the continental shelf of the Guyana.
One shell of I. tricingulata from Brazil has a late emergence of the adapical spiral cord, only at the end of the third whorl of the shell ( Fig. 3J View Fig ). This might be a small abnormality in the development of the initial whorls.
Geographical records
Antigua ( Zhang 2011); Guadeloupe (type locality); Brazil: Amapá (this study).
Bathymetric distribution
Depth: 72 m (this study) to 81 m (type locality).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SuperFamily |
Triphoroidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Triphorinae |
Genus |
Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015
Fernandes, Maurício Romulo & Pimenta, Alexandre Dias 2020 |
Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015: 47
Rolan E. & Fernandez-Garces R. 2015: 47 |
“ Isotriphora ” sp.
Zhang D. Y. 2011: 99 |