Trachycaris restricta (A. Milne Edwards, 1878 )

Cardoso, Irene, 2006, Caridea (Crustacea, Decapoda) collected on the Brazilian (13 / 22 S) continental shelf and slope, Zootaxa 1364, pp. 1-44 : 21-26

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.174755

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6261433

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E58789-FFA1-FFBA-B560-BDE3FDBE2E1A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Trachycaris restricta (A. Milne Edwards, 1878 )
status

 

Trachycaris restricta (A. Milne Edwards, 1878) View in CoL

( Figs. 15–18 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 )

Hippolyte restrictus A. Milne Edwards, 1878: 231 View in CoL .

Trachycaris restricta Holthuis, 1949: 233 View in CoL ; Christoffersen, 1979: 362; Chace, 1972: 142; 1997: 58.

Material examined: 16o47´13” S, 38o 41´48” W, 50m, 4 female (1.3 to 3mm), MNRJ 19458.

Diagnosis: Carapace tuberculate, with teeth and tufts of setae; rostrum laterally flattened, as long as high, dorsal margin with 8–13 teeth, distal margin with 3–6 small teeth, lower margin with 3 broad teeth, dorsal carina with 5–7 teeth; antennal spine strong and acute, 2–3 small teeth on anterolateral angle. Stylocerite broad ending in 2 processes, proximal one acute and distal rounded, with strong teeth. Scaphocerite with small distal tooth, not overreaching blade.

Description: Carapace tuberculate, with teeth and tufts of setae; rostrum laterally flattened, as long as high, dorsal margin with 8 teeth, distal margin with 3 teeth, lower margin with 3 broad teeth, dorsal carina with 5 teeth; antennal spine strong and acute, 2 small teeth on anterolateral angle, without postorbital, branchiostegal and hepatic spines ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 A). Stylocerite broad ending in two processes, proximal one acute and distal rounded, with strong teeth ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 B). Scaphocerite with small distal tooth, not overreaching blade ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C). Mandible, incisor process absent; molar process formed by two lobes, distal one formed by series of crests with serrate setae and serrate setae with broad, short denticles on lateral margins ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 A). Maxilla 1, broad distal endite with papposerrate setae on inner margin; basal endite slender, with 4 serrate setae on inner margin; palp with 2 plumose seta on tip ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 B). Maxilla 2, scaphognathite with plumose setae on all margins; endopod one fourth scaphognathite length; endite with 3 lobes, distal and median lobes, with serrate setae on inner margin and basal lobe, with plumose setae on inner margin ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 C). Maxilliped 1, exopodal lobe slender, with plumose setae on outer margin; exopod well developed, almost twice the exopodal lobe length, with plumose articulated setae on apex; endopod one third of exopod length, unsegmented, with a small rounded lobe at base; endite with two lobes, distal with serate setae on inner margin and basal with plumose setae on inner margin ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 D). Maxilliped 2, basis and ischium fused, propodus large, corresponding to basis-ischium, merus and carpus combined length, with serrate setae on inner margin; small, slender dactylus with plumose setae on inner margin ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 E). Maxilliped 3, ischiomerus with a distal outer tooth; carpus short; propodus-dactylus with 2 long cuspidate setae and 4 short cuspidate setae on outer margin, 2 short cuspidate setae on dorsal margin, and 2 long cuspidate setae on tip ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 F). Pereopod 1 longer and stronger than second; broad merus with distal dorsal tooth; propodus elongate with 2 broad cuspidate setae on tip, dactylus with 2 broad cuspidate setae ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 A). Pereopod 2 elongate, carpus subdivided in 2 articles; propodus elongate, with 2 cuspidate setae on tip; dactylar tip with 3 cuspidate setae ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 B). Pereopod 3, longer than the others, propodus with 5 stout setae on inner margin; dactylus with 2 cuspidate setae on inner and one large cuspidate seta on tip ( Fig. View FIGURE 17

17C). Pereopod 5 shorter than the others, propodus without cuspidate setae; dactylus with 2 cuspidate setae on inner margin and one large cuspidate seta on tip ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 D). Female endopod of pleopod 1 short and broad, with plumose setae on all margins ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 A). Female endopod of pleopod 2, appendix interna reduced to a small lobe with a plumose seta on tip ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 B). Telson with 3 pairs of dorsolateral cuspidate setae and 2 pairs oh distal cuspidate setae, the inner smallest ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C). Endopod of uropod without diaresis; lateral margin ending in sharp triangular projection; without a posterolateral tooth ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C).

Distribution: Western Atlantic: Bermudas, Florida, Yucatan, Cuba, Porto Rico, Curacao and Brazil (Pará to Espírito Santo). Eastern Atlantic: Cape Verde, Canary Islands and Gulf of Guine.

Remarks: The genus Trachycaris was described to fit Platybema rugosus Bate, 1888 a species that, until 1940, was known only in the Western Atlantic. Holthuis (1949) compared T. rugosa from Canary Islands, with specimens of Hippolyte restrictus A. Milne Edwards, 1878 from Curaçao, and concluded that both forms were one species, that he called T. restricta . Criales (1992) examined 19 mature females from Western Atlantic ( Colombia, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Cuba, Belize, Florida and South Carolina) and concluded that these specimens were T. rugosa . The main differences between these two species are, according to Criales (1992), that T. rugosa lacks of a palp in mandible; has 2 spines on basal antennal peduncle and has an endopod of maxilliped 1 with 2 segments, while T. restricta bears a 2-segmented mandibular palp; 3 spines on basal antennal peduncle and an unsegmented endopod on maxilliped 1. Criales (1992) affirmed that both T.restricta and T. rugosa are valid species, and that the first occurs in the Eastern Atlantic and the second in the Western Atlantic. However, the material herein examined (from Western Atlantic) agrees completely with Holthuis (1949) description of T. restricta , having all the three features that distiguish T. restricta from T. rugosa . So, I conclude that if both species are valid, T. restricta distribution isn’t limited to Eastern Atlantic as the present record shows.

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Hippolytidae

Genus

Trachycaris

Loc

Trachycaris restricta (A. Milne Edwards, 1878 )

Cardoso, Irene 2006
2006
Loc

Trachycaris restricta

Christoffersen 1979: 362
Chace 1972: 142
Holthuis 1949: 233
1949
Loc

Hippolyte restrictus A. Milne Edwards, 1878 : 231

Milne 1878: 231
1878
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF