Diastatotropis arofaniana Trýzna & Baňař, 2022

Trýzna, Miloš & Baňař, Petr, 2022, Diastatotropis arofaniana sp. nov. from eastern Madagascar, a new species close to D. rubra Frieser, with a redescription of the type of the latter, and notes on morphology (Coleoptera: Anthribidae), Zootaxa 5120 (1), pp. 30-52 : 34-40

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5120.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A4679D0-E046-44DA-8349-DC5B0B81D7CB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6388857

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487AC-FFC3-FFEB-FF03-FF7416AE87AB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Diastatotropis arofaniana Trýzna & Baňař
status

sp. nov.

Diastatotropis arofaniana Trýzna & Baňař sp. nov.

( Figs 9–31 View FIGURES 9–13 View FIGURES 14–17 View FIGURES 18–19 View FIGURES 20–26 View FIGURES 27–31 , 43–48 View FIGURES 43–44 View FIGURES 45–46 View FIGURES 47–48 , 51 View FIGURE 51 )

Type locality. E Madagascar, secondary but well-preserved forest in Parc National d´Analamazaotra , S 18°57´07´´; E 48°25´51´´, 1020 m.

Type material. Holotype (male): E MADAGASCAR, TOAMASINA PROVINCE: ‘E Madagascar, 16.-21.i.2017, / Andasibe N.P., Analamazaotra, / circuit Aventure , 1020 m, / S 18°57´07´´; E 48°25´51´´, / M. Trýzna leg.’ [p] ( MMBC) GoogleMaps . Allotype (female): the same data as holotype ( MTDC) GoogleMaps . Paratypes (3 males, 3 females): 1 male, 2 females: the same data as holotype; GoogleMaps 1 male: ‘ Madagascar, 964 m, / Mantadia N.P., 30.i.2019, / Tsakoka circuit, / S 18°47´30.3´´, E 48°25´37.2´´, / primary forest, M. Trýzna leg.’ [p]; GoogleMaps 1 male: ‘ Madagascar / Toamasina distr. / Analamazaotra env. / 3.- 8.12.1997 / Jiří Stolarczyk lgt.’ [p] (all in MTDC) GoogleMaps ; 1 female: ‘ Madagascar / Annananarivo / ( Sikora ) // Karl Jordan Coll. / B M. 1940-109.’ [p] ( BMNH) .

Red label [p] HOLOTYPE / ALLOTYPE / PARATYPE / Diastatotropis / arofaniana sp. nov. / M. Trýzna & P. Baňař det., 2022.

Identification. Small-sized species (ca. 6.0– 7.4 mm), rather more oval than elongate ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–13 , 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Elytra distinctly convex, forming wide regular arch in lateral view, without sub-basal tubercles ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–13 ). Rostrum with only one central longitudinal carina, lateral carinae absent; central carina distinct, reaching beyond posterior margins of eyes ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9–13 , 17 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Antennae relatively short ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9–13 , 16 View FIGURES 14–17 ), antennomeres III–VIII gradually widened and smoothing continuing to antennal club (in both sexes). Disc of pronotum with shallow transverse imprint in anterior part better visible in lateral view) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–13 ). Surface of the whole body, including its lower part, reddish, especially head and pronotum crimson red. Elytra black, only narrow margins of elytra reddish (female paratype in BMNH with elytra only black, without reddish margins). Scape, pedicel and antennomeres III–VII reddish, VIII–XI contrasting black. Legs reddish, distal part of tibiae and tarsomeres light brown.

Description. Male holotype (female allotype). Measurements (in mm): Total body length—6.09 (6.35). Head: total length—1.39 (1.40); length of rostrum—0.70 (0.73); maximum width of rostrum—1.07 (1.19); length of eye— 0.71 (0.71); maximum width across eyes—1.29 (1.41); minimum distance between eyes—0.36 (0.50). Antenna: length of segments: II—0.20 (0.21), III—0.20 (0.20), IV—0.23 (0.17), V—0.16 (0.11), VI—0.11 (0.09), VII—0.13 (0.11), VIII—0.10 (0.09), IX—0.33 (0.33), X—0.16 (0.16), XI—0.31 (0.31), width of segment IX—0.37 (0.50). Pronotum: maximum length—1.43 (1.46); width at carina (= maximal width in this case)—2.14 (2.31); minimum width—1.31 (1.64). Elytra: maximum length—3.38 (3.40); maximum width—2.80 (2.88). Pygidium: maximum length—0.55 (0.55); maximum width—0.80 (0.88).

Coloration of the cuticle of entire body largely reddish, head and pronotum crimson red. Disc of elytra, antennomeres VIII–XI and inner margins of mandibles contrasting black. Scutellum and humeri light-coloured. Distal part of tibiae and tarsomeres including claws light brown. ( Figs 9–19 View FIGURES 9–13 View FIGURES 14–17 View FIGURES 18–19 ).

Vestiture. Head with sparse reddish to yellowish appressed setae, denser along central longitudinal carina on rostrum and around eyes ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 9–13 , 17 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Labrum light reddish to yellowish with a few longer light-coloured setae in distal part. Antennomeres III–IX with distinct subdecumbent setae: III–VIII with reddish, VIII with black setae; IX–XI with appresed black setae ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 9–13 , 16 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Pronotum, including pronotal declivity, with sparse appressed crimson red setae ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 9–13 , 15 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Elytra with very fine, delicate, indistinct and sparse appressed setae, their colour corresponds to surface of elytra: light-coloured on black disc of elytra and reddish on its margins ( Figs 9, 13–14 View FIGURES 9–13 View FIGURES 14–17 ). All legs covered with dense appressed reddish to yellowish setae, tibiae with subdecumbent setae in inner part. Tarsomeres with light-brownish setae ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 9–13 , 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Whole ventral part of body and pygidium covered with indistinct sparse appressed reddish setae.

Structure. Head ( Figs 11 View FIGURES 9–13 , 17 View FIGURES 14–17 ) rather shorter, rostrum wider than long, ratio of rostrum length to maximum width 0.65 in male, 0.61 in female. Rostrum slightly bent upwards, not flat in lateral view. Lateral sides of rostrum weakly extended apically. Dorsal part of rostrum with only one central longitudinal carina, two lateral carinae absent. Central carina distinctly developed, not extended distal part of rostrum and reaching vertex behind posterior margin of eyes. Eyes elliptical, not emarginate, dorsal ocular index 0.77 in male, 1.10 in female. Ratio of maximum width across eyes to maximum width of rostrum 1.21 in male, 1.18 in female.

Antennae ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 9–13 , 16 View FIGURES 14–17 ) reaching to posterior margin of pronotum in male, female antennae imperceptibly shorter, reaching only to dorsal transverse carina of pronotum. Scape not swollen, of the same width as pedicel, rest of antennomeres flattened, gradually widened and fluently continue to antennal club in both sexes. Antennomere IX transverse, ratio of its maximum length to maximum width 0.89 in male, 0.66 in female.

Pronotum ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 9–13 , 15 View FIGURES 14–17 ) transverse, ratio of its length to maximum width 0.67 in male, 0.63 in female, the widest in dorsal transverse carina, then narrowed to distal part. Disc of pronotum with shallow transverse imprint in anterior part (better visible in lateral view). Dorsal transverse carina slightly sinuated, not interrupted in middle. Lateral carinae of pronotum short, not reaching half of length of pronotum, widely rounded at contact with dorsal transverse carina.

Elytra ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 9–13 , 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ) short, rather oval, without sub-basal tubercles, ratio of the maximum length to maximum width of elytra 1.21 in male, 1.18 in female. Elytral intervals completely flat, dorsal punctures very small and inconspicuous, their diameter much smaller than distance of individual punctures.

Pygidium ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 20–26 , 27 View FIGURES 27–31 ) transverse, ratio of the maximum length to maximum width 0.69 in male ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–26 ), 0.63 in female ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27–31 ).

Male terminalia. ( Figs 21–26 View FIGURES 20–26 ). Sternite VIII ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20–26 ) semicircular, its halves vaguelly separted, compact, inconspicuously delimited posteriorly [fused?], tergite VIII sligthly overlapping sternite VIII anteriorly, ostium very short and broad, triangle shaped. Aedeagus ( Figs 22–24 View FIGURES 20–26 ) slender, tiny, pedon and tectum wide, tectum inconspicuously overlapping pedon, its apex bent dorsally, apex of pedon very strongly bent dorsally in lateral view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–26 ). Apodemes long, continuosly widening posteriad in lateral view ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–26 ), moderately curved. Internal sac with very fine serration, noticeable under high magnification only, ejaculatory duct very long. Tegmen ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 20–26 ) relatively robust with long apodeme, tegminal plate very wide, basal piece with two conspicuous, roughly, sclerotized spurs oriented posteriorly. Apex of tegmen ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 20–26 ) with group of long and thick setae.

Female terminalia. ( Figs 28–31 View FIGURES 27–31 ). Sternite VIII ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27–31 ) with broadly concave anterior margin and strongly sclerotized apodeme. Tergite VIII ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27–31 ) sub-rectangular, its anterior margin straight. Ovipositor ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27–31 ) wide and short, lateral rods diverging. Hemisternites unarmed, simple, without toothed plates, with only sub-apically placed stylus each ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 27–31 ). Bursa copulatrix large, not studied in detail ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27–31 ).

Sexual dimorphism. Generally, not very conspicuous. Male: very slightly more slender, distance between eyes smaller (dorsal ocular index 0.77), antennae slightly longer, reaching posterior margin of pronotum, abdominal ventrites flat in middle. Shape of pygidium as in Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–26 . Female: more robust, distance between eyes larger (dorsal ocular index 1.10), antennae shorter, only reaching dorsal transverse carina of pronotum, abdominal ventrites convex. Shape of pygidium as in Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27–31 .

Variability. The female paratype (in BMNH) from ‘Annananarivo’ has the entire elytra black, without reddish margins. The male paratype from Analamazaotra (lgt. Stolarczyk, in MTDC) has head and pronotum light red, antennomeres I–VII, scutellum, humeri and all legs yellowish to light brownish.

Etymology. The species name arofaniana is derived from the Malagasy word arofanina meaning handrail, banister. The name refers to the fact that the new species was collected almost exclusively on the wooden railings of stone stairs on the forest path (see below).

Collecting circumstances. Most specimens of the type series (including the holotype) were collected in wellpreserved secondary forest in Analamazaotra ( Figs 43–44 View FIGURES 43–44 ) on a wooden handrail installed along the stone steps on a hiking trail on the ‘Aventure’ circuit ( Figs 45–46 View FIGURES 45–46 ). This wooden handrail was made from logs ca. 10 cm in diameter, from an unspecified deciduous tree. At the time of construction, the handrail was completely debarked, and painted with industrial brown paint. At the time of collection, i.e. several few years after construction, the paint had already been damaged locally, partially peeling off, but it still covered more than 90% of the surface of the wooden railing. Only in a few cases was the wood of the handrail sufficiently exposed that small fruiting bodies of unspecified fungi already grew from it. Collecting on the handrail was carried out for 4 days (between 16–18 January, 2017).

A simple method was used: sweeping the lower side of the horizontal parts of the wooden handrail (for methods see also Trýzna and Baňař 2012). Although collecting was also done on dead and dying wood in the vicinity, no other specimens were found there.

Together with Diastatotropis arofaniana other species of anthribids were also found on the handrail, e.g. members of the genera Diastatotropis and Lemuricedus .

Only one specimen that we collected of the type series was from natural wood. This male was captured on dead wood of an unspecified deciduous tree species in primary forest along the forest path of the ‘ Tsakoka’ circuit in Parc National de Mantadia ( Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 47–48 ) .

Note: In the forests of these both protected areas, wooden handrails are often built on forest paths. These handrails are built along stairs in sloping terrain, or as part of small bridges that cross small watercourses. It was accidentally discovered a few years ago, that handrails are widely used by miscellaneous species of anthribids. Thus, it is possible to find here, for example, species of the genera Apatenia , Caranistes , Diastatotropis , Lemuricedus , and some representatives of the subfamily Choraginae . Some of these handrails are built from natural wood, and at the time of collecting they were still covered with more or less intact bark. However, it was a surprise to us, that many species were also found on debarked handrails, moreover ones that were painted with industrial paint ( Figs 49–50 View FIGURES 49–50 ).

Distribution. E Madagascar, Toamasina province. The species is only known from the type locality Parc National d´Analamazaotra, and from Parc National de Mantadia. These two localities are ca. 16 km apart by air. One female with locality label ‘ Madagascar, Annananarivo’ (in BMNH) does not provide a more accurate locality.

According to Moravec (2007: 18) locality labels with ‘Annanarivo’ (often labelled so by insect dealers) refer to “larger area of Antananarivo, probably including the Angavo massif (Anjozorobe) north-east of the capital, or they were simply used by insect dealers instead of ‘Madagascar’”.

Differential diagnosis. Diastatotropis arofaniana may be confused with D. rubricollis , but particularly with D. rubra . These three species can be distinguished from each other by the characters given in the following key:

1 Rostrum approximately as long as wide, flat, not bent (observed in lateral view); with one central longitudinal carina and two lateral carinae irregularly and crookedly developed. Dorsal side of head and disc of pronotum with coarse, dense sculpture. Upper side of body matt. All antennomeres completely black or deep blue.................... D. rubricollis (Fairmaire)

- Rostrum distinctly wider than longer, slightly bent upwards, or with shallow transverse impression in line of scrobes (observed in lateral view); with only one central longitudinal carina, two lateral carinae absent. Dorsal side of head with very fine, delicate and sparse sculpture, disc of pronotum smooth, almost without any structure. Upper side of body shiny, especially disc of pronotum and elytra polished. At least scape distinctly reddish................................................. 2

2 Antennomeres III–VII thin (only female holotype known), VIII twice as wide as VII and thus part of four-segmented antennal club ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Elytra rather sub-oval, ratio of maximum length to maximum width 1.46; disc of elytra rather flat in lateral view ( Figs 32, 36 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Disc of pronotum regularly convex, without any transverse impression in anterior part ( Fig. 33, 36 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Whole body brick red, scape brick red, only pedicel and antennomeres III–VIII dark brownish to black, and IX–XI markedly black ( Figs 32–36 View FIGURES 32–36 )................................................................................ D. rubra Frieser

- Antennomeres III–VIII gradually widened and smoothly continue to antennal club (in both sexes) ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 9–13 , 16 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Elytra rather oval, ratio of maximum length to maximum width 1.21 in male, 1.18 in female; disc of elytra distinctly convex and forming wide regular arch in lateral view ( Figs 9, 13 View FIGURES 9–13 , 14 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Disc of pronotum with shallow transverse impression in anterior part (better visible in lateral view) ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 9–13 , 15 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Whole body red, especially head and pronotum crimson red, only disc of elytra and antennomeres VIII–XI markedly black ( Figs 9–17 View FIGURES 9–13 View FIGURES 14–17 ).......................... D. arofaniana Trýzna & Baňař sp. nov.

MMBC

Moravske Muzeum [Moravian Museum]

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF