Stenotrupis breviscapus, Davis & Engel, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13135896 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487AA-A060-E51A-4E4E-FDD6FDD6FE38 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stenotrupis breviscapus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Stenotrupis breviscapus View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 26 View Figs 23-28 , 39-43 View Figs 39-48 )
H o l o t y p e: USNM 505344 (= Woodruff #9793), amber, Dominican Republic, Early Miocene (Burdigalian). P a r a t y p e s: USNM 504857 (= Woodruff #9304) and USNM 505354 (= Woodruff #9803), amber, Dominican Republic, Early Miocene (Burdigalian).
D i a g n o s i s Body distinctly dorso-ventrally compressed, less than 2.0 mm, with sparse setae scattered throughout. Compound eyes circular. Scape extending back only to near anterior margin of compound eye ( Fig. 39 View Figs 39-48 ). Rostrum nearly straight, slightly longer than length of pronotum. Width of metepisternum less than width of antennal club, with one longitudinal row of minute punctures.
D e s c r i p t i o n: Total body length (including rostrum) ca. 2.13 mm; maximal width ca. 0.29 mm; elytral length ca. 1.23 mm. Integument light brown to brown (as preserved) ( Fig. 26 View Figs 23-28 ). Body markedly dorso-ventrally compressed ( Fig. 26 View Figs 23-28 ). Compound eyes circular, length approximately equal to width; interocular distance approximately equal to width of rostrum at mid-length in dorsal view. Rostrum with dense covering of short, fine setae, puncticulate, punctures minute; rostrum slightly longer than length of pronotum; ventral margin nearly straight in profile, only very broadly and uniformly curved along entire length ( Fig. 39 View Figs 39-48 ); rostrum gradually expanded slightly apically in dorsal view ( Fig. 40 View Figs 39-48 ). Antenna inserted immediately before mid-length of rostrum; scrobe short and shallow; scape extending near to posterior margin of compound eye; scape moderately long (albeit still short by comparison to modern species), slightly more than one-third length of rostrum; funicle 5-segmented ( Fig. 41 View Figs 39-48 ), gradually enlarging to distinct, setose club. Vertex mostly glabrous and punticulate. Head slightly constricted behind compound eyes, with distinct, transverse region of glabrous integument beyond constriction and near posterior margin of head. Pronotum with dense covering of short, fine setae, length approximately 1.2✕ width; anterior portion narrower than posterior portion; small, shallow punctures present, punctures separated by distance 0.5-1✕ puncture diameter; two longitudinal rows, each of four larger punctures separated by distance much less than 0.5✕ puncture diameter, along middle of pronotum; lateral margins broadly rounded. Prosternum without shallow depression between procoxae, puncticulate, and with dense covering of short, fine setae; coxal positions depicted in figure 43. Scutellum ovoid, convex. Elytra with dense covering of short, fine setae, each with approximately 7-8 striae; punctures of elytral striae small and shallow, separated by distance approximately 1✕ puncture diameter; elytra approximately four times length of pronotum; humeri subquadrate. Metepisternum narrower than width of antennal club, with a single, distinct, longitudinal row of minute punctures. Metasternum and abdominal ventrites puncticulate, with somewhat dense covering of short, fine setae. Femora generally broad ( Fig. 42 View Figs 39-48 ), widest at mid-length and puncticulate; tibiae slightly laterally expanded apically; apical tibial unci at outer angle small, partially obscured by amber piece; denticle on opposite side of uncus on inner angle obscured, it is unclear as to its presence.
E t y m o l o g y: The specific epithet is a combination of the Latin words brevis (meaning "short") and scapus (meaning "stem") and is a reference to the relatively short scape by comparison to modern species of the genus.
812
C o m m e n t s: This species is very similar to its modern congeners except in the reduced length of the scape.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.