Enicospilus grammospilus ( Enderlein, 1921 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.873.2133 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:099F6A49-6516-4F39-9E20-A077A5D60535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8039558 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E3AC44-FFBE-FFC8-9725-FC1B024D8B04 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Enicospilus grammospilus ( Enderlein, 1921 ) |
status |
|
Enicospilus grammospilus ( Enderlein, 1921) View in CoL View at ENA
Fig. 34 View Fig
Dicamptus grammospilus Enderlein, 1921: 17 ; holotype ♂ from Sumatra ( IZPAN) .
Enicospilus grammospilus View in CoL – Nikam 1980: 190
Diagnosis
Interocellar area yellowish brown; clypeus weakly convex, ventral margin acute; mandible moderately long, twisted 20°–30°, outer surface without a diagonal setose groove; fore wing fenestra with proximal, central and distal sclerites, all sclerites weak to moderately strong, central sclerite transversely linear, situated in the middle of fenestra, vein 2r&RS with a weak, central, anteriorly deflected angulation.
Material examined
VIETNAM • 1 ♀; Hanoi, Thach That, Tan Xa ; 10–20 Mar. 2002; Khuat D.L. leg.; Malaise trap; IEBR • 1 ♀; Phu Tho Province, Thanh Son, Kiet Son ; 6–10 Apr. 2009; Khuat D.L. leg.; Malaise trap; IEBR • 1 ♀; Vinh Phuc Province, Me Linh Station for Biodiversity ; 3 Jun. 2010; Pham T.N. leg.; light trap; IEBR • 1 ♀; Gia Lai Province, Kon Ka Kinh NP ; 8 Jun. 2011; Nguyen Q.T. leg.; light trap; IEBR • 1 ♂; Cao Bang Province, Phia Oac - Phia Den NP ; 6 May 2013; Hoang V.T. leg.; light trap; IEBR • 1 ♀; Son La Province, Phu Yen, Gia Phu ; 18 Jun. 2015; Hoang V.T. leg.; light trap; IEBR • 1 ♂; Bac Kan Province, Ba Be NP ; 6 Jul. 2015; Hoang V.T. leg.; hand net; IEBR • 1 ♀; Cao Bang Province, Phia Oac - Phia Den NP ; 22°35.305′ N, 105°52.552′ E; 1216 m a.s.l.; 23 May 2020; Hoang V.T. and Pham V.P. leg.; light trap; IEBR GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for preceding; 24 May 2020; IEBR GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; 3 Jun. 2020; Nguyen D.H. leg.; light trap; IEBR GoogleMaps .
Remarks
In comparison with the specimens examined by Gauld & Mitchell (1981), Vietnamese specimens have the fore wing length 11.7–19.2 mm (vs 15.0–17.0 mm), CI = 0.38–0.5 (vs 0.5–0.58), ICI = 0.47–0.74 (vs 0.43–0.51). Their lower faces are narrower (0.63–0.71× as wide as high vs 0.72–0.76 ×) and antennae with 53–63 flagellomeres (vs 58–63).
Distribution
Brunei, China (including Taiwan), India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Vietnam ( Yu et al. 2016).
IZPAN |
IZPAN |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Enicospilus grammospilus ( Enderlein, 1921 )
Pham, Nhi Thi, Pham, Phu Van, Matsumoto, Rikio, Shimizu, So & Broad, Gavin R. 2023 |
Enicospilus grammospilus
Nikam R. K. 1980: 190 |
Dicamptus grammospilus
Enderlein G. 1921: 17 |