Eremias laticeps Smith, 1845
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4318.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C7208E07-6474-42Dc-92Fd-98E27Ccd23D5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5615705 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E087E5-6934-FF99-DFA8-FC40FC89E5CF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eremias laticeps Smith, 1845 |
status |
|
The type specimen BMNH 1946.8.7.56 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ), collected by Smith, matches perfectly his description and drawings ( Smith 1845). However, it is evident that Smith described only one side of the voucher; femoral pores are given by Smith (1845) as 13, but are left side 13, right side 14; Smith described the freno-nasal and the freno-ocular plate ( Smith 1845) as “freno-nasal plate small, quadrangular, rather longer than deep, freno-ocular plate large and subtriangular” (Plate 48: 3 and 3a), whereas on the right side the freno-nasal plate is small, quadrangular, rather longer than deep, and the freno-ocular plate large and subtriangular, and on the left side the freno-nasal and freno-ocular are fused ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). This is consistent with the lithograph in Plate 48: 3 and 3a being reversed and showing the right side of the head, which as FitzSimons (1937) explained, is a consequence of this printing technique. However, this contradicts our findings regarding Plate 48: 7a ( Smith 1845) depicting E. capensis .
Why the description of the type specimen given by Boulenger (1921) does not match with Smith (1845) cannot be determined. All specimens of P. laticeps examined by Boulenger (1921) are still in the BMNH collection and can be assigned correctly, plus three specimens (BMNH 1988.511, BMNH 1988.513–514) subsequently presented by E. N. Arnold in 1988 ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ).
Although BMNH 1946.8.7.56 is treated as the type of E. laticeps , it should be noted that Smith described one voucher in detail but mentioned a total of three specimens ( Smith 1845), which consequently form syntypes. All other specimens in the collection of the BMNH presented by Smith or Lord Derby cannot be the one described by Smith as none has only 5 upper labials in front of the subocular ( Smith 1845, Plate 48: 3a; Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 and Table 2 View TABLE 2 this work). For stability we herein designate in accordance with Articles 74.1. and 74.7. of the Code (ICZN, 1999), specimen BMNH 1946.8.7.56 as lectotype of Pedioplanis laticeps Smith, 1845 , which is depicted on plate 46 figure 1 and plate 48, figures 3 and 3a of the original description. Consequently, specimens BMNH 1865.5.4.87 and BMNH 1865.5.4.88 become paralectotypes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.