Hemirrhagus perezmilesi, Garcia-Villafuerte & Locht, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12112 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7BA11142-CBC1-4026-A578-EBAB6D2B6C0C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E087B4-5674-FFFF-FC13-49B5B1FA12FE |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Hemirrhagus perezmilesi |
status |
|
HEMIRRHAGUS PEREZMILESI View in CoL
GARCÍA- VILLAFUERTE & LOCHT, 2010
( FIGS 23A–G View Figure 23 , 24A–D View Figure 24 , 25A–F View Figure 25 , 48 View Figure 48 )
Hemirrhagus perezmilesi García-Villafuerte & Locht, 2010: 82 View in CoL , figs 2–11. (D ♂, ♀)
Type material: Holotype ♂ CNAN T-0395 and paratype ♀ CNAN T-0396 , MEXICO: Cerro Tres Picos , Mpio. Villa Corzo, Chiapas xi.2007 to vi.2008, col. K. Zárate-Gálvez, C. Pérez-Bonifaz, G. Salinas, M. A. Rabasa. Examined.
Additional material examined: 2 ♂ CNAN T-0397 and CNAN T-0398 , Cerro Tres Picos , Mpio. Villa Corzo, Chiapas xi.2007 to vi.2008, col. K. Zárate-Gálvez, C. Pérez-Bonifaz, G. Salinas, M. A. Rabasa ; 1 ♂ AMNH, same data as previous .
Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. perezmilesi . Male palpal bulb with slender embolus, similar in length to tegulum, SA ends at retrolateral face of the embolus; VG shallow; embolus strongly curved retrolaterally on distal third ( Fig. 24A–D View Figure 24 ). Ocular tubercle slightly reduced, all eyes normally developed; periocular pigmentation complete in males, in females only in anterior eye row and strongly marked in AME ( Figs 23A, C View Figure 23 ; 25A, E View Figure 25 ). Metatarsus I straight ( Fig. 23D View Figure 23 ). Male tibia I lacks tibial apophyses ( Fig. 23E View Figure 23 ). Urticating setae arranged in two lateral round patches, yellowish-orange in colour and with well-defined margins ( Figs 23B View Figure 23 , 25B View Figure 25 ). With stridulatory setae conformed by CLP on palpal trochanter retrolateral face and SP on trochanter I prolateral face ( Figs 23F, G View Figure 23 , 25C, D View Figure 25 ). Spermathecae paired, slightly fused at the base; receptacles finger-shaped and slightly bent laterally ( Fig. 25F View Figure 25 ). Hemirrhagus perezmilesi differs from all other Hemirrhagus by the stridulatory setae conformed by CLP and SP and by lacking tibial apophyses.
Description of new features: Holotype male CNAN T 0395. Stridulatory setae: on palpal trochanter retrolateral face, almost as long as trochanter, with six CLP that gradually increase in size from 0.2 to 1.0 (ventral to dorsal) ( Fig. 23F View Figure 23 ). Trochanter I with three SP on prolateral face ( Fig. 23G View Figure 23 ).
Legs and palpi LSC in: femur retrolateral face; leg I coxa retrolateral face, trochanter prolateral face, femur prolateral face.
Paratype female CNAN T0396 . Stridulatory setae: on palpal trochanter retrolateral face, almost as long as trochanter, with four CLP wider at distal half that gradually increase in size from 0.8 to 0.9 (ventral to dorsal) ( Fig. 25C View Figure 25 ). Trochanter I with three PL on prolateral face ( Fig. 25D View Figure 25 ) .
Legs and palpi LSC in: femur retrolateral face; leg I coxa retrolateral face, trochanter prolateral face, femur prolateral face.
Distribution and natural history: Known only from Cerro Tres Picos, Reserva de la Biosfera La Sepultura, Chiapas; inhabits pine forest ( Fig. 48 View Figure 48 ). The specimens were collected in pit-fall traps.
HEMIRRHAGUS PERNIX ( AUSSERER, 1875) View in CoL
( FIGS 26A–K View Figure 26 , 27A–C View Figure 27 , 49 View Figure 49 )
Crypsidromus pernix Ausserer, 1875: 178 , pl. 6 figs 22, 23 (D ♂).
Hapalopus pernix F.O.P.- Cambridge, 1897: 31, pl. 2, fig. 14a–c.
Cyrtopholis pernix Pocock, 1903: 98 ; Simon, 1903: 931; Smith, 1986: 82, fig. 34h; Smith, 1987: 82, fig. 34h; Smith, 1995: 182, figs 1011, 1021.
Hemirrhagus pernix Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 374 View in CoL .
Type material: Holotype ♂ BMNH-351, MEXICO: Veracruz, Pic d’Orizaba. Coll. Keys. Examined by photos.
Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. pernix . Male palpal bulb with slender embolus, longer than tegulum, SA retrolaterally extended, ends at embolus retrolateral face; VG deep ( Fig. 27A–C View Figure 27 ). Embolus strongly curved retrolaterally on distal half ( Fig. 27C View Figure 27 ). Metatarsus I curved ( Fig. 26J View Figure 26 ). Ocular tubercle and eyes normally developed, periocular pigmentation complete ( Fig. 26C View Figure 26 ). With stridulatory setae conformed by SP on retrolateral face of palp trochanter and PL on prolateral face of trochanter I ( Fig. 26F, G View Figure 26 ). Urticating setae arranged in one dorsomedian patch, platinum in colour. Hemirrhagus pernix differs from most Hemirrhagus species by the stridulatory setae being conformed by SP and PL. It differs from H. nahuanus by the strongly curved metatarsus I and from H. franckei sp. nov. by the strong posterior curvature of SA.
Redescription: Holotype male: body length (not including chelicerae and spinnerets) 26.90, carapace: 10.90 long, 9.20 wide. Caput not markedly elevated; fovea recurved ( Fig. 26A View Figure 26 ).
Eyes: anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row recurved. Periocular pigmentation complete and all eyes normally developed. Eye sizes and interocular distances: AME 0.29; ALE 0.31; PME 0.22; PLE 0.27; AME–AME 0.23; AME–ALE 0.15; PME–PME 0.82; PME–PLE 0.039; ALE–PLP 0.17. Ocular tubercle normally developed, width 1.80; length 1.40; clypeus lacking ( Fig. 26C View Figure 26 ). Labium: length 1.40; width 1.80; with 30 cuspules ( Fig. 26D View Figure 26 ). Maxilla inner corner with approximately 120 cuspules. Cheliceral pro- margin with 11 teeth (proximal to distal: first-third large, fourth-sixth medium, seventh-eleventh large). Sternum length 4.30. Sigillae oval, third and fourth pairs hardly visible; fourth pair one and a half times its length from the margin ( Fig. 26B, E View Figure 26 ).
Leg formula: IV, I, III, II. Length of legs and palpal segments (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 8.6, 4.6, 6.7, 7.0, 5.5, 32.4. II: 8.3, 4.3, 6.3, 6.9, 5.3, 31.1. III: 8.4, 3.8, 6.3, 7.9, 5.5, 31.9. IV: 10.2, 4.3, 8.1, 10.9, 6.7, 40.2. Palp: 6.5, 3.6, 5.4, -, 1.54, 17.04. Spinnerets: PMS, 0.9 long, 0.8 apart; PLS, 2.1 basal, 1.2 middle, 1.3 distal.
Scopulae: tarsi I– IV densely scopulate, III and IV divided by strong band of setae. Metatarsi I densely scopulate, II scopulate on distal half, III scopulate on distal third, and IV scopulate on distal fifth.
Tibia I with two apophyses, which do not originate from a common base, Pap normally developed with one large spinose seta on ventral face, the spinose seta does not exceed the apex of Pap; Rap normally developed, broad at its base, with one large spinose seta on dorsal face, the spinose seta does not exceed the apex of Rap ( Fig. 26H, I View Figure 26 ). Metatarsus I curved ( Fig. 26J View Figure 26 ).
Stridulatory setae: located on palpal trochanter retrolateral face, positioned proximally. With c. 11 SP of similar size, disorganized. Trochanter I with PL on prolateral face ( Fig. 26F, G View Figure 26 ).
Legs and palpi LSC in: unknown, the holotype lost most of its body setae due to conditions of preservation.
Chaetotaxy (left side): femora I 1p; II 3p, 3r; III 2p, 4r; IV 2p, 3r; palp 1p, 1r; patellae III 1d; IV 1d; palp 1d; tibiae I 3p, 9v; II 4p, 12v; III 5p, 12v, 3r; IV 6p, 11v, 4r; palp 6p, 4r; metatarsi I 3v; II 1d, 5v; III 3p, 11v, 5r; IV 2d, 6p, 13v, 5r.
Palp: embolus wide at the base, tapering distally, longer than tegulum, SA retrolaterally extended, ends at embolus retrolateral face; VG deep ( Fig. 27A View Figure 27 ). Embolus strongly curved retrolaterally on distal half ( Fig. 27C View Figure 27 ).
Urticating setae: type VI, arranged in one dorsomedian patch, platinum in colour; all margins of the patch well defined, anterior and posterior margins undivided.
Colour pattern: the colour is black in ethanolpreserved specimens ( Fig. 27K View Figure 27 ).
Distribution and natural history: Known only from Pico de Orizaba, Veracruz-Puebla, México, presumed habitat of this species is pine forest ( Fig. 49 View Figure 49 ).
Note: The exact distribution site of this species is unknown. However, in 2012 after a review of potential sites for these tarantulas near Pico de Orizaba, two Hemirrhagus juveniles were collected that seem to match the diagnostic features of H. pernix . These
specimens are being kept alive to wait for them to mature in order to establish their specific identity.
HEMIRRHAGUS PUEBLA ( GERTSCH, 1982) View in CoL
( FIGS 28A–F View Figure 28 , 49 View Figure 49 )
Spelopelma puebla Gertsch, 1982: 91 , fig. 16 (D ♀); Schmidt, 1993: 68, fig. 132; Smith, 1995: 36, figs 44–54; Schmidt, 2003: 118, fig. 70.
Hemirrhagus puebla Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 373 View in CoL .
Type material: Holotype ♀ AMNH, MEXICO: Puebla, Mpio. Cuetzalan del Progreso, Cueva de Tasalolpan. 22.xii.1976, col. J. Reddell, A. Grubbs, C. Soileau and D. McKenzie. Examined.
Note: Smith, 1995 mentioned one juvenile specimen deposited in AMNH belonging to H. puebla . This specimen was collected in Cueva de la Barranca, 8 km south-west of Cuetzalan, Puebla, 25.xii.1973, col. D. McKenzie. After review, it was determined that this specimen does not belong to H. puebla and it is an undescribed species.
Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. puebla . Ocular tubercle not developed, PLE reduced, AME and PME as integumentary spots; periocular pigmentation absent ( Fig. 28C View Figure 28 ). Lacking urticating setae on abdomen ( Fig. 28E View Figure 28 ). Tarsi I and II scopulae divided by narrow band of setae, III and IV divided by strong band of setae. Spermathecae paired, receptacles close together and strongly fused at their base ( Fig. 28F View Figure 28 ). Hemirrhagus puebla differs from all other Hemirrhagus species by the spermathecae receptacles being close together and strongly fused at their base and in having the AME and PME as integumentary spots.
Redescription: Holotype female: body length (not including chelicerae and spinnerets) 12.99, carapace: 6.64 long, 4.68 wide. Caput not elevated; fovea recurved, width 1.10 ( Fig. 28A View Figure 28 ).
Eyes: anterior eye row procurved, posterior eye row straight. Periocular pigmentation absent, PLE reduced, AME and PME as integumentary spots. Eye sizes and interocular distances: AME 0.24; ALE 0.11; PME 0.081; PLE 0.15; AME–AME 0.15; AME–ALE 0.14; PME–PME 0.48; PME–PLE 0.065; ALE–PLE 0.073. Ocular tubercle undeveloped, width 1.10; length 0.3; clypeus lacking ( Fig. 28C View Figure 28 ). Labium: length 0.65; width 1.20; with eight cuspules. Maxilla inner corner with approximately 115 cuspules ( Fig. 28D View Figure 28 ). Cheliceral promargin with 13 teeth (proximal to distal: first medium, second-fifth large, sixth-seventh medium, eighth-thirteenth large) ( Fig. 22F View Figure 22 ). Sternum length 2.6. Sigillae oval, second, third, and fourth pairs hardly visible; fourth pair one and a half times its length from the margin ( Fig. 28B View Figure 28 ).
Leg formula: IV, I, III, II. Length of legs and palpal segments (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 6.60, 3.49, 6.08, 5.30, 3.53, 25.0. II: 5.85, 3.33, 5.23, 4.74, 3.45, 22.60. III: 5.73, 3.18, 5.30, 5.93, 4.14, 24.28. IV: 7.28, 3.04, 7.24, 8.32, 4.25, 30.13. Palp: 4.90, 2.71, 4.07, -, 2.97, 14.65. Spinnerets: PMS, 0.3 long, 0.1 apart; PLS, 1.1 basal, 0.5 middle, 0.8 distal.
Scopulae: tarsi I– IV densely scopulate; I and II divided by narrow band of setae, III and IV divided by strong band of setae. Metatarsi I and II densely scopulate; III scopulate on distal half, and IV scopulate on distal third.
Stridulatory setae: lacking.
Legs and palpi LSC in: palp trochanter prolateral and retrolateral faces, femur prolateral and retrolateral faces; leg I coxa retrolateral face, trochanter prolateral face.
Chaetotaxy (left side): femora I 1p; II 1p; III 1p, 2r; IV 1p, 1r; palp 1p; patellae palp 1v; tibiae I 4v; II 2p, 3v; III 2p, 8v, 2r; IV 2p, 7v, 3r; palp 1p, 9v; metatarsi I 2v; II 3v; III 5p, 7v, 1r; IV 3p, 10v, 2r.
Genitalia: spermathecae paired, receptacles close together and strongly fused at their base; slightly curved outwards from the base, without neck defined by interior and exterior margins ( Fig. 28F View Figure 28 ).
Urticating setae: lacking ( Fig. 28E View Figure 28 ).
Colour pattern: live specimens have not been observed. In ethanol the colour is yellowish.
Distribution and natural history: Known only from Cueva de Tasalolpan in Cuetzalan, Puebla, México ( Fig. 49 View Figure 49 ). The species has not been found outside this cave.
HEMIRRHAGUS REDDELLI ( GERTSCH, 1973) View in CoL
( FIGS 29A–K View Figure 29 , 49 View Figure 49 )
Schizopelma reddelli Gertsch, 1973: 143 , fig. 2b (D ♀).
Spelopelma reddelli Gertsch, 1982: 91 , fig. 15; Schmidt, 1993: 68, fig. 131; Smith, 1995: 36, figs 55–63; Schmidt, 2003: 118, fig. 71.
Hemirrhagus reddelli Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 374 View in CoL .
Type material: Holotype ♀ AMNH, MEXICO: Oaxaca, Cueva del Nacimiento del río San Antonio. 09.iii.1973, col. J. Reddell, S. Murphy, D. McKenzie, M. McKenzie and M. Butterwick. Examined.
Additional material examined: 1 ♀ AMNH, MEXICO: Oaxaca, 10 km south-south-west of Acatlán, Cueva del
Nacimiento del río San Antonio. 31.xii.1973, col. J. Reddell, W. Elliott, R. Jameson.
Emended diagnosis: The following character combination is diagnostic for H. reddelli . Ocular tubercle undeveloped; PME reduced to integumentary spots; periocular pigmentation only in AME ( Fig. 29C View Figure 29 ). With stridulatory setae conformed by HFS on the base of retrolateral face of palp femur, PL on retrolateral face of palp trochanter and three SP distally on prolateral face of trochanter I ( Fig. 29F–H View Figure 29 ). Lacking urticating setae on abdomen. Labium with fewer than ten cuspules ( Fig. 29D View Figure 29 ). Metatarsus IV lacking scopula. Spermathecae paired, receptacles separated at base, straight and slender throughout their length ( Fig. 29J, K View Figure 29 ). Hemirrhagus reddelli differs from all other Hemirrhagus species by the stridulatory setae being conformed by HFS on retrolateral face of palp femur.
Redescription: Holotype female: body length (not including chelicerae and spinnerets) 20.22, carapace: 8.99 long, 7.05 wide. Caput not elevated; fovea recurved, width 2.50 ( Fig. 29A View Figure 29 ).
Eyes: anterior eye row recurved, posterior eye row recurved. Periocular pigmentation only present in AME, PME very reduced, only integumentary spots. Eye sizes and interocular distances: AME 0.185; ALE 0.14; PME 0.11; PLE 0.16; AME–AME 0.071; AME–ALE 0.23; PME–PME 0.625; PME–PLE 0.057; ALE–PLE 0.071. Ocular tubercle undeveloped, width 1.25; length 0.4; clypeus lacking ( Fig. 29C View Figure 29 ). Labium: length 1.15; width 1.70; with seven cuspules. Maxilla inner corner with approximately 122 cuspules ( Fig. 29D View Figure 29 ). Cheliceral promargin with 11 teeth (proximal to distal: first medium, second-fifth large, sixth medium, seventh-tenth large, eleventh medium; Fig. 29I View Figure 29 ). Sternum length 4.1. Sigillae large oval, second, third, and fourth pairs hardly visible; fourth pair once its length from the margin ( Fig. 29B, E View Figure 29 ).
Leg formula: IV, I, II, III. Length of legs and palpal segments (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus, total): I: 10.37, 4.77, 10.88, 10.09, 6.68, 42.79. II: 9.90, 4.74, 10.06, 10.02, 6.97, 41.69. III: 10.11, 3.95, 9.16, 10.89, 7.12, 41.23. IV: 11.90, 4.32, 12.59, 15.05, 8.34, 52.20. Palp: 7.48, 3.93, 6.32, -, 6.09, 23.82. Spinnerets: PMS, 2.0 long, 1.1 apart; PLS, 2.4 basal, 1.7 middle, 2.3 distal.
Scopulae: tarsi II – V densely scopulate, III and IV divided by strong band of setae. Metatarsi I and II densely scopulate; III scopulate on distal half, and IV without scopulae.
Stridulatory setae: SP on trochanter I prolateral located distocentrally, with three spinose setae large and curved ( Fig. 29G View Figure 29 ). There is also a group of c. 20 hard setae ( FHS), congregated in a subcircular spot basally on palp femur retrolateral ( Fig. 29F View Figure 29 ). Palp trochanter with PL retrolaterally ( Fig. 29H View Figure 29 ).
Legs and palpi LSC in: palp femur retrolateral face; leg I coxa retrolateral face, trochanter prolateral and retrolateral faces, femur prolateral face; leg II trochanter prolateral face.
Chaetotaxy (left side): femora I 1p; II 2p; III 2p, 2r; IV 1p, 1r; palp 1p; patellae none; tibiae I 2p, 6v; II 2p, 5v, 1r; III 2p, 8v, 3r; IV 2p, 8v, 3r; palp 1p, 8v, 1r; metatarsi I 1v; II 5v; III 4p, 9v, 3r; IV 2d, 4p, 8v, 1r.
Genitalia: spermathecae paired; receptacles completely separated at their base, longer than wide, straight and slender throughout their length; with neck defined by interior and exterior margins ( Fig. 29J View Figure 29 ).
Urticating setae: lacking.
Colour pattern: live specimens have not been observed. In ethanol the colour is yellowish.
Distribution and natural history: Known only from Cueva del Nacimiento del Río San Antonio, Oaxaca, México ( Fig. 49 View Figure 49 ). The species has not been found outside this cave.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
SA |
Museum national d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratiore de Paleontologie |
CLP |
Forest Products Research and Development Institute |
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
PL |
Západoceské muzeum v Plzni |
PMS |
Peabody Essex Museum |
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hemirrhagus perezmilesi
Mendoza Marroquín, Jorge I. 2014 |
Hemirrhagus perezmilesi García-Villafuerte & Locht, 2010: 82
Garcia-Villafuerte MA & Locht A 2010: 82 |
Hemirrhagus pernix Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 374
Perez-Miles F & Locht A 2003: 374 |
Hemirrhagus puebla Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 373
Perez-Miles F & Locht A 2003: 373 |
Hemirrhagus reddelli Pérez-Miles & Locht, 2003: 374
Perez-Miles F & Locht A 2003: 374 |
Spelopelma puebla
Schmidt G 2003: 118 |
Smith AM 1995: 36 |
Schmidt G 1993: 68 |
Gertsch WJ 1982: 91 |
Spelopelma reddelli
Schmidt G 2003: 118 |
Smith AM 1995: 36 |
Schmidt G 1993: 68 |
Gertsch WJ 1982: 91 |
Schizopelma reddelli
Gertsch WJ 1973: 143 |
Cyrtopholis pernix
Smith AM 1995: 182 |
Smith AM 1987: 82 |
Smith AM 1986: 82 |
Pocock RI 1903: 98 |
Simon E 1903: 931 |
Hapalopus pernix
Cambridge FOP 1897: 31 |
Crypsidromus pernix
Ausserer A 1875: 178 |