Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-67.4.401 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DF878E-7708-8271-FF78-FB391965456B |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838 |
status |
|
Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838 View in CoL Figs. 4 View Figs , 12–15, 19
Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838: 67 View in CoL . Chevrolat 1863: 202; Sharp 1882a: 733; Zimmermann 1920: 263; Blackwelder 1944: 80; Epler 1996: 3:39, 2010: 5.51.
Cybister (Nealocomerus) occidentalis View in CoL . Young 1953: 7, 1955: 121; Brinck 1945: 13.
Diagnosis. This species is uniquely characterized by the nearly right-angled ( Fig. 6 View Figs ) to slightly rounded ( Fig. 7 View Figs ) apicoventral angle of the metafemur combined with the presence of extremely large marginal lobes on the median lobe of the aedeagus in males (Fig. 12–14). This species differs from C. explanatus in having the apicoventral angle of the metafemur nearly right-angled and often slightly rounded (as in Fig. 6 View Figs ) rather than acuminately produced ( Fig. 7 View Figs ) and the presence of extremely large marginal lobes on the median lobe of the aedeagus in males (Fig. 12–14). Cybister occcidentalis can only be confidently separated from C. fimbriolatus by characteristics of the male median lobe. In C. fimbriolatus , the ventral sclerite is long and relatively slender, extending to near the apex of the median lobe (Figs. 8–10). In C. occidentalis , the ventral sclerite is much shorter and broader, ending well short of the apex of the median lobe (Figs. 12–14).
Measurements. TL = 27.6–33.7 mm, GW = 14.4–18.2 mm, TL/GW = 1.8–1.9.
Variation. The main variation within this species is in size, though it is not extreme (30– 34 mm). Also, some specimens have the lateral yellow stripes on the elytra shorter, not extending to the apex of the elytra.
Taxonomy. Aubé (1838) described this species based on specimens from Cuba (type locality = “ Cuba, Havana ”) . The type specimen was not examined, but there can be little doubt as to the identity of this species from Cuba .
Distribution. This species is found mainly in the Bahamas and Cuba ( Fig. 19 View Fig ). The species has also been collected from Big Pine Key from extreme southern Florida ( Young 1953, 1954; Epler 2010). Turnbow and Smith (1983) recorded the species also from Crisp County, Georgia. This is some distance outside the expected range of the species, and Young (1954) did not find the species anywhere else in the southeastern mainland, suggesting that this record could be erroneous.
Natural History. This species is found in ponds and ditches ( Young 1953, 1954).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838
Miller, Kelly B. 2013 |
Cybister (Nealocomerus) occidentalis
Young 1953: 7 |
Brinck 1945: 13 |
Cybister occidentalis Aubé, 1838: 67
Epler 1996: 39 |
Blackwelder 1944: 80 |
Zimmermann 1920: 263 |
Sharp 1882: 733 |
Chevrolat 1863: 202 |
Aube & Species 1838: 67 |