Alipes Imhoff, 1854
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4825.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F230F199-1C94-4E2E-9CE4-5F56212C015F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4457015 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE092D-FFDF-D727-FF13-FD6F2C62D988 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Alipes Imhoff, 1854 |
status |
|
(!) Alipes Imhoff, 1854 View in CoL View at ENA
Figs 84–88 View FIGURES 84–88
Type species. Alipes multicostis Imhoff, 1854 View in CoL (by monotypy).
Diagnosis. Median tooth of labrum well developed. Forcipular tooth-plates present, trochantero-prefemur with well-developed process ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 84–88 ). Tergites with some (usually five) longitudinal keels ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 84–88 ); well-developed spinules (not tubercles, as noted Edgecombe & Bonato 2011) of various sizes arranged along the keels (“spinulated keels”, see above). Space between tergal keels spinulated (not granulated, as noted Edgecombe & Bonato 2011). Sternites lacking both paramedian sutures and longitudinal sulci, sometimes with some (in most species three) shallow depressions. LBS 7 lacking spiracles, the latter with an atrium. Legs with tarsal spur(s). Coxopleural process very short, apically rounded and spineless ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 84–88 ). Ultimate legs considerably elongated, prefemur and femur normal, tibia and tarsi strongly flattened forming an oval leaf-shaped structure ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84–88 ), with stridulatory grates on opposite surfaces of tibia and tarsus 1; pretarsus rudimentary or totally reduced. Ultimate prefemur ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 84–88 ) lacking both spines and corner spine; in A. appendiculatus Pocock, 1896 and A. calcipes Cook, 1897 prefemur with a median digitiform process attaching close to its base. This process is long in males (fig. 214 in Attems 1930) and rudimentary in females and is similar to that of Parotostigmus males.
Number of species. 7 ( Bonato et al. 2016).
Sexual dimorphism. Present in two species.
Remarks. Treated as a genus by Edgecombe & Bonato (2011: 402), Vahtera et al. (2012a: 7, 2012b: 235, 2013: 581), Joshi & Edgecombe (2018: 1318). The most recent morphological accounts on Alipes are Lewis (2001) and Iorio (2003).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |