Miniopterus australis robustior Revilliod, 1914

Parnaby, Harry E., Ingleby, Sandy & Divljan, Anja, 2017, Type Specimens of Non-fossil Mammals in the Australian Museum, Sydney, Records of the Australian Museum 69 (5), pp. 277-420 : 394

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.2201-4349.69.2017.1653

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68F315FF-3FEB-410E-96EC-5F494510F440

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7562818

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD87C8-FFCC-7340-1B1D-FF0DFB709391

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Miniopterus australis robustior Revilliod, 1914
status

 

Miniopterus australis robustior Revilliod, 1914 View in CoL

Nova Caledonia, A. Zool. 1: 359, plate x, 2 tables. (1914)

Common name. Loyalty Bentwing-bat.

Current name. Miniopterus robustior Revilliod, 1914 ; following Simmons (2005).

? Syntype. M.5172, female, skull, body in alc., Kepenete [= Chépénéhé], Lifou, Loyalty Islands, collected 23 April 1912. Registered in AM on 12 September 1931, received in exchange from “Natural History Museum, Bâle” (= NMB). The specimen is inadvertently listed as a male by Flannery (1995c) .

Condition. Cranium missing right zygomatic arch, fracture in right parietal; dentaries complete. Body in alc.: broken right forearm (near elbow), fur slip on both ventral and dorsal surfaces of abdominal area.

Comments. Troughton believed this specimen was a “co-type” and he marked it as such in the M Register but there is no record of an original field number or NMB registration number. Although from the original series collected by Sarasin and Roux, we are not sure if it is a syntype. Hill (1971) had a similar problem with a specimen of this taxon marked “co-type” in the BMNH. Revilliod (1914) did not designate a holotype but his description is based on nine specimens for which he lists registration numbers and individual measurements. The nine syntypes and four skulls listed by Revilliod are listed as being in the NMB by Oakeley (1998). Multiple specimens are registered under some numbers and she lists a total of 16 specimens, all listed as syntypes. The implication from Oakeley (1998) is that all specimens were listed as “typus” without an indication of those used in Revilliod’s description.

AM

Australian Museum

NMB

Naturhistorishes Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Chiroptera

Family

Miniopteridae

Genus

Miniopterus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF