Leuctra variabilis Hanson 1941
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4752768 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8BFBE3F7-E0EF-4EDD-BA82-9EA087F74688 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4758513 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD8784-FF8A-A70A-FEC4-5EC765D5FE83 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Leuctra variabilis Hanson 1941 |
status |
|
Leuctra variabilis Hanson 1941 View in CoL
Variable Needlefly
http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera .specie sfile.org:TaxonName:460700
( Figs. 48‒52 View Figs )
Leuctra variabilis Hanson 1941:62 View in CoL . Holotype ♂ ( USNM), Paradise Trail , Sunderland, Massachusetts Leuctra variabilis View in CoL : Illies 1966:111
Male. The 7th abdominal dorsal process shown herein from eastern Tennessee is symmetricallytrapezoidal with no appearance of lateral lobes ( Fig. 48 View Figs ). The specimens examined from eastern Kentucky have small, laterally-directed spurs, yet still lack the appearance of lateral lobes. The specilla are broad basally, tapering slightly and not recurved; specilla mostly smooth in appearance, bearing shallow pits along the distal outer margin and very few raised tubercles ( Figs. 49‒52 View Figs ). The subanal lobes are narrow throughout length, gently recurved anteriorly, and ca. 90% the length of the inner lobes ( Figs. 49, 51‒52 View Figs ).
Material examined. USA, Kentucky, Harlan Co., Watts Creek, Blanton Forest State Nature Preserve, 36.8619, -83.3753, 9 September‒4 November 2009, M.A. Floyd, 4♂ ( DCTC) GoogleMaps . North Carolina , Mitchell Co., tributary to Holder Creek , FS 130, 36.1018, - 82.1266, 23 October 2014, A.L. Sheldon, 1♂, 1♀ ( WKU) GoogleMaps . Tennessee, Carter Co., Twin Springs, 26 km N Spruce Pine ( NC) , Cherokee National Forest , 36.1213, -82.0865, 29 November 2002, S.A. Grubbs, 3♂ ( WKU) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. USA: MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, VA, VT ( DeWalt et al. 2015), NC, TN (new state records).
Remarks. The abdominal dorsal process of L. variabilis is similar only to L. usdi . Hanson (1941, fig. 7) depicted three forms of the dorsal process, namely with the absence or presence of small lateral lobes that appear superficially-similar to L. usdi ( Fig. 43 View Figs ). These two species can more readily be separated by characteristics of the specilla. The distal outer margin of the specilla of L. usdi bears numerous raised tubercles ( Figs. 45, 47 View Figs ) whereas on L. variabilis the tubercles are lacking along the distal outer margin and at the tips ( Figs. 49‒52 View Figs ). The shallow pits present along the outer margin on L. variabilis are lacking on L. usdi . Additionally, L. usdi is a spring-emergent species whereas L. variabilis emerges during late summer and autumn.
WKU |
Western Kentucky University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leuctra variabilis Hanson 1941
Grubbs, Scott A. 2015 |
Leuctra variabilis
Illies, J. 1966: 111 |
Hanson, J. F. 1941: 62 |