Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel, 1905

Janák, Jiří, 2018, Revision of the genus Acylophorus Nordmann, 1837 from Madagascar and Mascarene Islands (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae: Acylophorina), Zootaxa 4462 (2), pp. 151-191 : 164

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4462.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA92FB55-EA2E-4193-946E-F780A16EB3CC

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5960295

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD5963-FFF8-FFD1-FF7A-FE86FB90EAFC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel, 1905
status

 

Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel, 1905 View in CoL

( Figs. 52–66 View FIGURES 52–60 View FIGURES 61–66 , 175 View FIGURES 172–177 )

Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel, 1905: 181 View in CoL ; Bernhauer and Schubert, 1914: 438; Jarrige, 1965: 141; Herman, 2001: 3028; Lott, 2010: 9 (characters, Figs.).

Type locality. Madagascar, Ambovombé , ca. 25 10' S, 46 05' E. GoogleMaps

Type material examined. Holotype ♂: MADAGASCAR: “Ambovombé Madag.”, “ Acylophorus Nordmann ”, “ delphinus Fvl. ”, “R.I.Sc.N.B. 17.479 Coll. et det. A. Fauvel”, “ TYPE ”, “ HOLOTYPE Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel m# det. DA Lott, 2009” ( IRSNB).

Additional material examined. MADAGASCAR: 2 ♂: NW Madagascar, Morondava distr., Kirindi Forest, 4.– 8.1.2002, J. Rolčík lgt. ( JJRC); 1 ♀: Mahajanga prov., Mahajamba riv., Ampatika env., 10.– 12.12.1996, Ivo Jeniš lgt. ( JJRC); 1 ♂: 60 km N Morondava, Kirindi , 100 m, 5.– 7.1.2004, S. Murzin & A. Shamaev leg. ( JJRC).

Redescription (n=5). Body length 6.8–7.6 mm (M= 7.2 mm, HT= 7.2 mm), forebody length 3.0– 3.2 mm (M= 3.1 mm, HT= 3.2 mm). Body ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 52–60 ) brown, apical margins of abdominal segment reddish, abdominal tergites markedly iridescent; antennae brown with base of first two segments and segment 11 light reddish; legs reddish yellow, maxillary palpi reddish yellow, last segment brown.

Head subrounded ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 52–60 ), about as long as wide (L/W=0.97–1.04, M=1.00, HT=1.01), slightly widened behind eyes, with two pairs of interocular setae. Temples markedly shorter than eyes (LT/LE=0.63–0.69, M=0.65, HT=0.67). Dorsal side of head shining, without micropunctures. Dense pale grey pubescence behind eyes. Four postocular setae visible on each side, additional seta on hind margin of eye absent. Left mandible with two sharp teeth, right mandible with three sharp teeth ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 52–60 ). Maxillary palpi with terminal segment wide and long, pubescent, asymmetric, markedly wider and much longer than glabrous penultimate segment which is triangular ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 52–60 ). First segment of antenna nearly as long as next four; segments 1 to 7 elongate, segment 5 markedly elongate (R=1.58–1.69, M=1.62, HT=1.69), segment 8 about as long as wide, segment 9 slightly transverse, segment 10 markedly transverse (R=0.68–0.82, M=0.75, HT=0.82).

Pronotum markedly transverse (R=1.14–1.21, M=1.16, HT=1.12), markedly widened behind with sides slightly rounded, widest in basal half ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 52–60 ), shining, without micropunctures. One pair of dorsal setae and one pair of lateral setae. Marginal setae short. Elytra transverse (R=1.43–1.52, M=1.47, HT=1.52) with short, pale, but not shining pubescence arising from dense aspirate punctures. Apical fringe of bristles slightly longer than pubescence on other parts of the elytra. Abdominal tergites with relativelly short, moderately dense pubescence, arising from aspirate punctures more coarse and sparser than on elytra.

Meso- and metatarsi with empodial setae longer than claws (similar as in Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 9–17 ).

Male (n=5). Sternite 9 long and narrow ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61–66 ), apex of tergite 10 narrowly rounded, with very long apical setae ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61–66 ). Aedeagus ( Figs. 56–62 View FIGURES 52–60 View FIGURES 61–66 ) 0.81–0.87 mm long (M = 0.84 mm, HT = 0.87 mm). Parameres bilobed, lobes widely separated, apically slightly widened, sensory pegs confusedly arranged at the very apex ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61–66 ). Median lobe of aedeagus markedly overreaching paramere, apex rounded ( Figs. 58–60 View FIGURES 52–60 , 62 View FIGURES 61–66 ).

Female. Tergite 10 pointed apically ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61–66 ), valves as in Fig. 66 View FIGURES 61–66 .

Differential diagnosis. Acylophorus delphinus is similar to A. orientalis Fauvel, 1907 from continental Africa, but can be distinguished by the pale terminal segment of the maxillary palpi, the longer additional postocular seta on the hind margin of the eye and the shape of the aedeagus.

Distribution. The species is known only from South and South-west Madagascar ( Fig. 175 View FIGURES 172–177 ).

Bionomics. Nothing is known about the bionomics of the new species.

Discussion. The unique male type from Ambovombe was studied by Jarrige (1965, wrongly reported as a female) and Lott (2010). Additional material is from south-western part of Madagascar.

IRSNB

Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Genus

Acylophorus

Loc

Acylophorus delphinus Fauvel, 1905

Janák, Jiří 2018
2018
Loc

Acylophorus delphinus

Fauvel, 1905 : 181
Bernhauer and Schubert, 1914 : 438
Jarrige, 1965 : 141
Herman, 2001 : 3028
Lott, 2010 : 9
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF