Aulonastus species
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2840.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC87DB-FF15-FF26-70B5-FD41FA3DFCE1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aulonastus species |
status |
|
Key to Aulonastus species
(Females)
1. Setae f2 and h2 subequal in length................................ A. sturnellus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010
– Setae h2 distinctly longer than f2 ........................................................................ 2
2. Setae c1 and se subequal in length........................................................................ 3
– Setae c1 1.2–1.5 longer than se ......................................................................... 5
3. Length ratio of setae f1: f2 1:2.8–3....................................................................... 4
– Length ratio of setae f1: f2 1:1.4–2.................................................. A. lusciniae Skoracki, 2002 View in CoL
4. Setae h2 21 times longer than h1 and f1. Setae c1 and d2 subequal in length. Each medial branch of peritremes with 1 chamber, each lateral branch with 6 chambers..................................................... A. pipili Kethley, 1970 View in CoL
– Setae h2 11–12 times longer than h1 and f1. Setae c1 1.2 times longer than d2. Each medial branch of peritremes with 2 chambers, each lateral branch with 5 chambers.......................... A. pirangus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010
5. Setae f2 twice as long as f1 ............................................................................. 6
– Setae f2 3–4 times longer than f1 ........................................................................ 8
6. Propodonotal shield constricted posteriorly, bearing bases of setae ve, si and c1 Setae e2 1.5 –2 times longer than d1 .................................................................. A. emberizicus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010
– Propodonotal shield rectangular in shape, bearing bases of setae ve, si, se and c1 Setae e2 and d1 subequal in length...... 7
7. Length of aggenital setae ag1 and ag2 55.................................................... A. anthus View in CoL sp. nov.
– Length of aggenital setae ag1 and ag2 80–95............................................... A. fringillus View in CoL sp. nov.
8. Length ratio of setae f1:f2 1:2.8–3.3..................................................................... 9
– Length ratio of setae f1:f2 1:4.......................................................................... 10
9. Each medial branch of peritremes with 1 chamber. Length ratios of setae f2: h2 and ag1: ag2 1:3 and 1.2–1.4:1. Length of setae ag2 40–45................................................... A. euphagus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010
– Each medial branch of peritremes with 2 chambers. Length ratios of setae f2: h2 and ag1: ag2 1:4 and 1:1. Length of setae ag2 65–80............................................................. A. prunellae Bochkov and Mironov, 1999 View in CoL
10. Propodonotal shield constricted posteriorly, bearing bases of setae ve, si and c1. Aggenital setae ag1 and ag2 subequal in length................................................................................ A. lanius View in CoL sp. nov.
– Propodonotal shield rectangular in shape, bearing bases of setae ve, si, se and c1. Aggenital setae ag1 1.2–1.5 times longer than ag2 ............................................................................................... 11
11. Lengths of setae se, d2, e2 and ag2 145–170, 130–145, 35–45 and 60–70 respectively................. A. loxius View in CoL sp. nov.
– Lengths of setae se, d2, e2 and ag2 125, 105–120, 20 and 50–55 respectively................... A. albus Skoracki, 2002 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.