Pharaonus Blanchard, 1851
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4012.1.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:55822610-6FE6-4218-A412-A080F3218F51 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5694718 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DA8788-4C34-FFEC-FF0F-B476FA1E6BB1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pharaonus Blanchard, 1851 |
status |
|
Key to the species of the genus Pharaonus Blanchard, 1851
We only examined female P. (Pharaonus) adelphus , P. (P.) varicoloreus , and P. (Tamerlanius) lederi . Based on these species, the following secondary sexual characters can be used for determining the sex: in males the antennal clubs are longer, the protarsi stouter, the inner claw of prolegs broader.
1. Clypeus with anterior margin raised, sides parallel, anterior angles rounded but right. Labrum not visible from above. In males: inner claw of the prolegs narrow and sharp ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ); antennal club longer, at least 1.7 times as long as the rest of the antenna. Species from North Africa to the Caucasus............................................... subgenus Pharaonus : 2
- Clypeus with anterior margin bordered but not raised, sides convergent forward, anterior angles obtuse. Labrum visible from above. In males: inner claw of the prolegs broad, subrectangular, with truncate apex ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 ); antennal club shorter, 1.3 times as long or shorter compared to the rest of the antenna. Species from central Asia.................. subgenus Tamerlanius: 7
2. (1) Pronotum (except margins) glabrous. Protibia of male tridentate. Black to brownish black, elytra seldom light brown. Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Syria, Turkey ( Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 7 – 10 , 20 View FIGURES 15 – 23 )............................... P. varicoloreus ( Burmeister, 1844)
- Pronotum with long pilosity on most or entire surface. Protibia of male bidentate. Elytra yellowish brown to light brown.... 3
3. (2) Pronotum with dense and strong punctation, punctures separated by a distance of less than one puncture diameter......... 4
- Pronotum with scattered and fine punctation, punctures separated by a distance of more than one puncture diameter. Armenia, Caucasus, Turkey ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 6 , 16 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ).................................................... P. caucasicus ( Reitter, 1888)
4. (3) Pygidium entirely punctate and striolate. Clypeus 1.8–2.0 times as wide as long. Pronotum without impressed median line. North Africa and Levant: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Libya, Sudan, Tunisia........................................... 5
- Pygidium with a smooth area between the tufts of setae. Clypeus 2.1–2.5 times as wide as long. Pronotum with a more-or-less distinct longitudinal impression along the midline. Iran........................................................ 6
5. (4) Dorsal surface of head, pronotum, and lateral parts of abdominal ventrites with denser, markedly long, erect or semierect setae. Pygidium covered with long and dense, almost recumbent setae forming two tufts near the base. Aedeagus stout, broader, especially in lateral view; lateral outline of parameres shallowly sinuate ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ): Egypt, Israel, Libya, Sudan, Tunisia ( Figs. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 10 , 17 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ).......................................................................... P. fasciculatus ( Burmeister, 1844)
- Dorsal surface of head, pronotum, and lateral parts of abdominal ventrites with less dense, not considerably long, erect, pale setae. Pygidium covered with considerably long, sparse, erect macrosetae concentrated laterobasally but not forming two tufts. Aedeagus slender, relatively narrow, especially in lateral view; lateral outline of parameres broadly rounded ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ). Algeria ( Figs. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 10 , 19 View FIGURES 15 – 23 )........................................................................ P. saharicus Král 2012
6. (4) Elytra with sparse pubescence arranged in loose stripes; denser on intervals 3, 5, and 7; setae reaching at least the middle of the elytra ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 – 14 ), shorter, but clearly visible (20X) setae reaching the apical region. In males: antennal club 1.13–1.16 times as long as the clypeal width. Iran ( Figs. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 6 , 14 View FIGURES 13 – 14 , 18 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ).............................. P. farsensis Keith, Sabatinelli , and Uliana
- Elytra with long pubescence limited to the humeral region and to a very narrow basal area, not going beyond the tip of the scutellum ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 14 ); the rest of the elytra glabrous or with some microsetae barely visible at 40X. In males: antennal club 0.91– 0.94 times as long as the clypeal width. Iran ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 3 – 6 , 13 View FIGURES 13 – 14 , 15 View FIGURES 15 – 23 )................ P. adelphus Keith, Sabatinelli , and Uliana
7. (1) Body, except elytra and appendages (but including femora), covered with very dense, strongly adpressed, short, thick, white setae; setae almost entirely obscuring the integument. Midline of the pronotum impunctate, glabrous. Pygidium completely and densely covered by uniformly thick setae, except for the narrow midline. Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan ( Figs. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 12 , 23 View FIGURES 15 – 23 )................................................................ P. semenowi ( Reitter, 1887)
- Body, except elytra and appendages (but including femora) bearing recumbent or semierect long, thin setae; setae not obscuring the integument. Midline of the pronotum punctate, setose. Pygidium bearing two basal tufts of dense setae, the rest of the surface is clearly visible through a loose pilosity. Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan ( Figs. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 12 , 22 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ).................................................................................. P. lederi ( Reitter, 1888)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Rutelinae |
SubGenus |
Pharaonus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Rutelinae |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Pharaonus |