Perdita hippolyta Portman & Griswold
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4214.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9FAD41E4-36F3-4AE0-B626-6A372E894A59 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6066792 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DA5156-6E25-3873-FF43-FC3CFECD6C7D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Perdita hippolyta Portman & Griswold |
status |
sp. nov. |
Perdita hippolyta Portman & Griswold View in CoL , sp. n.
Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 C, 16C, 17D, 18C–D, 23F, 24G, 34, 36A, 56F, 58K–L
Perdita (Macroterella) pilonotata Timberlake, 1980: 6 View in CoL , ♂ only (not ♀ holotype).
Perdita (Heteroperdita) pilonotata View in CoL (♂ only); Danforth 1996: 691 (change of subgenus).
Diagnosis. Both sexes of P. hippolyta have the metasoma orange-amber ( Figs. 15 View FIGURE 15 C, 16C). Females generally have prominent tan face marks ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C), but these can be entirely darkened in some specimens ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 D). The female can be recognized by the following combination of characters: face longer than broad, second medial cell present, and paraocular lobe generally lightened. The female is quite similar to P. pilonotata ; see diagnosis of P. pilonotata for additional information. The male of P. hippolyta can be recognized by the following combination of characters: head quadrate ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 D), metasoma broader than mesosoma, face metallic greenish-bronze with tan face marks on clypeus and especially on paraocular lobes, and mandibles distinctly narrowed subapically.
Description of female. Length: 3.2 mm. Forewing length: 1.8 mm.
Coloration. Head ( Figs. 18 View FIGURE 18 C–D) and mesosoma base color black with greenish-bronze metallic luster; clypeus ranging from entirely dark brown ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 D) to entirely tan ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C); supraclypeal mark tan, transverse, often absent; paraocular area generally dark except for tan spot on paraocular lobe; mandible tan, tip reddish; labrum ranging from dark brown to tan; scape tan, often marked with brown medially; antenna brown dorsally, tan ventrally; pronotal collar dark brown, generally with metallic tints; pronotal lobe with small tan spot, sometimes entirely dark; propodeum sometimes lightened to tan or brown laterally on anterior margin; legs dark brown except more or less lightened to tan on anterior face of fore tibia, joints, and all distal tarsi; wing veins dark brown; metasoma orange-amber ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 C), sometimes darkened on apical segments; T2 fovea dark brown; pygidial plate brown, margins dark.
Structure and vestiture. Head slightly longer than broad ( Figs. 18 View FIGURE 18 C–D); lateral areas covered in dense recumbent white pubescence, sparse pubescence encircling eyes, vertex with sparse erect pubescence; eyes parallel; facial fovea parallel to eye, linear, extending from level of top of antennal socket halfway to apex of eye, lower parts generally obscured by pubescence; mandible with very small sharp preapical tooth (often worn); labrum quadrate, slightly less than 2X broader than long; disc of clypeus broader than high, convex, apically protruding 1 OD from face; lateral extension completely folded over; venter of head with abundant inward-facing broadly hooked hairs; mesosoma strongly tessellate, impunctate, slightly shiny; pronotal collar slightly impressed, humeral angle weak; mesepisternum and margins of scutum sparsely covered with combination of recumbent and erect white pubescence; fore coxa and anterior margin of venter of mesepisternum with abundant, broadly hooked hairs; apex of mid tibia with some short, thick, curved setae; forewing with second medial cell present; metasoma suboval, narrow basally, tapering apically, widest at T3 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 C); terga tessellate and impunctate; T2 fovea short, linear, slightly thickened, 1/3 length of T2; pygidial plate narrowly triangular, apex bluntly pointed ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 F); hairs of prepygidial fimbria thickened, sparse.
Description of male. Length: 2.4 mm. Forewing length: 1.6 mm.
Coloration. Head ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 D) and mesosoma base color black with greenish metallic luster; clypeus brownishtan; supraclypeal mark tan, transverse, small; paraocular area brown, transverse, lightened to yellow-tan only on paraocular lobe; subantennal area often lightened to tan; mandible tan, tip reddish; labrum tan; scape tan except dark brown medially; antenna dark brown, tan ventrally; pronotal collar brown with slight metallic tints generally with very faint and small tan transverse marks on dorso-posterior margin; pronotal lobe tan or light brown; propodeum lightened to tan or brown laterally on anterior margin; legs dark brown except tan on anterior fore tibia, joints of tibiae and femora, distal tarsi; wing veins dark brown; metasoma uniformly orange-amber ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C); T2 fovea dark brown; pygidial plate amber.
Structure and vestiture. Head quadrate, broader than long ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 D); face with appressed white pubescence encircling antennal base; eyes parallel or slightly diverging below; mandible simple, expanded medially, constricted and bent subapically ( Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 D), extending to far side of labrum in repose; labrum quadrate, 1.5X broader than long; disc of clypeus broader than high, moderately convex, apically protruding less than 1 OD from face; lateral extension completely folded over; head with fine, sparse, pubescence ventrally; mesosoma strongly tessellate, impunctate, slightly shiny; pronotal collar slightly impressed, humeral angle weak; mesepisternum and margins of scutum sparsely covered with combination of recumbent and erect white pubescence; hind tibia with sparse, very short thickened hairs; metasoma broader than mesosoma, oval, wide basally, tapering apically, widest at T3 ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C); terga tessellate and impunctate; T2 fovea linear, slightly thickened, 1/4 length of T2; pygidial plate broadly triangular, apex broadly rounded ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 F); hairs of prepygidial fimbria slightly thickened, sparse.
Terminalia . S8 ( Fig. 56 View FIGURE 56 G) with spiculum triangular, lateral apodemes prominent, slightly curved towards; apical portion slightly convex, longer than broad, sides roughly parallel below, diverging slightly before strongly converging towards apex; apex narrow, strongly folded over dorsally, folded over portion broadly emarginate medially with two lateral points; short hairs ventrally; cuticle apparently lacking thinned area. Genital capsule as in Figs. 58 View FIGURE 58 K–L. Gonostyli separated dorsally by broad V-shape; dorsal lobe of gonostylus not differentiated; ventral lobe of gonostylus small with few minute hairs on apex, extending below cuspis and well below level of penis valve; volsella short, not reaching level of apex of penis valve; cuspis relatively large, gradually curving dorsally with spicules on dorsal margin of apex; digitus short, near gonostylus, lacking spicules; penis valve long, extending well beyond rest of genitalia, gradually diverging apically and curving ventrally, apex slightly expanded, approaching club-shaped; endophallus not reaching level of apex of penis valve.
Floral records. Boraginaceae (35 ♂ 62 ♀): Tiquilia canescens 6 ♂ 24 ♀, T. hispidissima 17 ♂ 7 ♀, T. sp. 12 ♂ 31 ♀.
Phenology. Active from May to September.
Distribution. Chihuahuan Desert ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 A), USA (and likely Mexico).
Type material. Holotype data: ♂, TEXAS: Culberson Co.: Linda Lake Salt Basin, Along Rd to dune area (31.81346 -105.08996): 22 Aug 2010, T.L. Griswold, Tiquilia sp. ( BBSL, accession no. BBSL 844675 View Materials ) . Paratype data: (35 ♂ 27 ♀) NEW MEXICO: Eddy Co.: Longview Spring , 0.7km E (32.1007 -104.6137): 1 ♀, 9 Jun 2010, J.D. Herndon, A. Druk; Main Cave Entrance, 1.9km SSW (32.16147 -104.4494): 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 27 May 2010, J.D. Herndon, A. Druk; Rattlesnake Springs (32.10953 -104.47161): 1 ♂, 19 Jul 2010, J.D. Herndon, H. Ikerd; Seven Rivers, 3 km S (32.5791 -104.4331): 4 ♂ 8 ♀, 16 May 1989, T.L. Griswold, Tiquilia canescens ; Upper Lowe Springs (32.1669 -104.50281): 1 ♂, 18 May 2010, A. Druk, J.D. Herndon, T.L. Griswold ; 1 ♂, 27 Jul 2010, J.D. Herndon; Otero Co.: White Sands National Monument ; Site E 2; ~ 0.18 km SW of Dunes Dr; gypsum dunes; interdune flats (32.7921 -106.2405): 1 ♂, 2–7 Aug 2010, K. Wright ( MSBA) . TEXAS: Culberson Co.: Linda Lake Salt Basin, Along Rd to dune area (31.81346 -105.08996): 9 ♂ 10 ♀, 22 Aug 2010, T.L. Griswold, T. sp. (1 ♂ 1 ♀ at UCRC) ; Pine Spring , 11 mi NW (31.935 -104.723): 1 ♂, 12 Jun 2004, J.L. Neff, T. hispidissima ( CTMI) ; Hudspeth Co.: Salt Flat , 1.5 mi E (31.748 -105.051): 13 ♂ 7 ♀, 14 Jun 2005, J.L. Neff, A. Hook, T. hispidissima (1 ♂ 1 ♀ at each of AMNH, CAS, SEMC, TAMU, USNM; 8 ♂ 2 ♀ at CTMI) ; Winkler Co.: Kermit , 13 mi S (31.665 -103.016): 3 ♂, 15 Jun 2005, J.L. Neff, A. Hook, T. hispidissima ( CTMI) .
Additional material examined. Total specimens: 10 ♂ 41 ♀. NEW MEXICO: Eddy Co.: Cottonwood Springs (32.09573 -104.46763): 1 ♂, 10 Jun 2010, J.D. Herndon, A. Druk; Lowe Ranch (32.1744 -104.4989): 1 ♂, 27 Jul 2010, J.D. Herndon; Main Cave Entrance, 1.9km SSW (32.16147 -104.4494): 1 ♀, 27 May 2010, J.D. Herndon, A. Druk ; 1 ♂, 8 Jul 2010, A. Druk, J.D. Herndon; Rattlesnake Springs (32.10953 -104.47161): 1 ♂, 19 Jul 2010, J.D. Herndon, H. Ikerd; Seven Rivers, 3 km S (32.5791 -104.4331): 2 ♂ 16 ♀, 16 May 1989, T.L. Griswold, Tiquilia canescens ; 1 ♀, 16 May 1989, T.L. Griswold, T. sp.; 1 ♀, 3 Sep 1990, T.L. Griswold, T. sp.; Upper Lowe Springs (32.1669 -104.50281): 1 ♀, 8 Sep 2011, J.D. Herndon ; Otero Co.: White Sands National Monument ; Site E 2; ~ 0.18 km SW of Dunes Dr; gypsum dunes; interdune flats (32.7921 - 106.2405): 2 ♀, 2–7 Aug 2010, K. Wright ; Valencia Co.: Correo (34.95805 -107.17111): 1 ♂, 15 Jun 1956, collector unknown. TEXAS: Culberson Co. : Linda Lake Salt Basin, Along Rd to dune area (31.81346 - 105.08996): 2 ♂ 19 ♀, 22 Aug 2010, T.L. Griswold, T. sp. ; Hudspeth Co.: Indio Mountains Research Station , 25 km S Van Horn (30.77699 -105.01623): 1 ♂, 25 Aug 1992, W.P. Mackay.
Etymology. The name comes from the character in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Treat as a noun in apposition.
Remarks. In his original description of P. pilonotata, Timberlake incorrectly associated the sexes. The name of P. pilonotata is retained by the female, while what was incorrectly ascribed as the male is here described as P. hippolyta .
BBSL |
USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Pollinating Insects-- Biology, Management and Systematics Research |
UCRC |
University of California, Riverside |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
CAS |
California Academy of Sciences |
SEMC |
University of Kansas - Biodiversity Institute |
TAMU |
Texas A&M University |
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Perdita hippolyta Portman & Griswold
Portman, Zachary M., Neff, John L. & Griswold, Terry 2016 |
Perdita (Heteroperdita) pilonotata
Danforth 1996: 691 |
Perdita (Macroterella) pilonotata
Timberlake 1980: 6 |