Ctenothrips guizhouensis, Xie, Yonghui, Zhang, Hongrui & Li, Zhengyue, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.277968 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6194629 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9E56F-FFBD-FFE9-FF05-176CFD9AF913 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ctenothrips guizhouensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ctenothrips guizhouensis View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs. 1–9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 )
Female macroptera. Body dark brown; apex of tibiae paler, tarsi yellow ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Antennal segments I & II dark brown, III and basal half of IV & V yellow, the other segments pale brown ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Forewings yellow with base slightly paler ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Antennae 8-segmented, segments III & IV with sensorium forked ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Head longer than wide, with sculpture of distinctly elongate reticulations behind eyes; ocellar setae I absent, setae III well developed in between posterior ocelli; all postocular setae arising in a row except seta II ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Pronotum wider than long, with smooth surface, less than 10 small scattered discal setae, 2 pairs of long posteroangular setae, posterior margin with 2 pairs of short setae ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Mesonotum with polygonally reticulate sculpture, anteromedian campaniform sensilla (CPS) present, but no striations close to these ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Metanotum with polygonally reticulate sculpture but striate laterally; median setae situated well behind anterior margin, arising closer to each other than to lateral pair; one pair of CPS posterior to median setae ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Meso- and metasternum furca without spinula ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Forewing first and second veins each with setal row complete, first vein with 21 setae, second vein with 16 setae, clavus with 5 marginal setae and apical and subapical setae more or less equally long. Abdominal tergite I–VII and anterior margin of VIII polygonally reticulate, CPS close to posterior margin; posteromarginal comb on tergite VIII complete with long, fine microtrichia ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ); tergite IX with 2 pairs of CPS, but without reticulation, median setae extending beyond apex of X; tergite X tube-like, sculptured with elongate reticulation, median longitudinal split complete ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Pleurotergites of abdominal II–VII with 2 discal setae. Abdominal sternites without discal setae, but with 2–3 pairs of posteromarginal setae arising on margin of each segment.
Measurements (holotype female in microns). Body length 2033. Head, length 198; width across eyes 176. Ocellar setae II length 38; ocellar setae III length 59; postocular setae I length 33. Pronotum, length 171; width 262; posteroangular setae length 61; posteromarginal setae length 25–51. Metanotum median setae length 38. Forewing length 1237. Antennal length 452; segments III–VIII length 89, 81, 60, 103, 13, 15.
Male. Unknown.
Specimens examined. Holotype female, CHINA, Guizhou Province, Zunyi city, Donggong temple, (27° 43' N, 106° 55' E, 865 m H), from Galium flower ( Rubiaceae ), 29. iv. 2009, Zhang Hong-Rui, in Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming.
Paratypes: 20 females, collected with holotype; 2 paratypes deposited in Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra.
Etymology. Specific epithet is taken from the collecting place.
Comments. This new species exhibits much intraspecific variation on the metanotum, with the position of the median setae and CPS varying. Most of the specimens are similar to the holotype, but some of the specimens have one pair of CPS anterior to the median setae.
This new species can be distinguished readily from the two South Asia species, C. smilax ( Bhatti, 1976) and C. niger ( Kudo, 1977) , since both of these have ocellar setae pair I present on the head. It shares many morphological character states with C. taibaishanensis ( Feng et al., 2003) and C. distinctus ( Franklin, 1907) . However, it differs from C. taibaishanensis in having polygonally reticulate sculpture on the mesonotum, and on abdominal sternite VII the posteromarginal setae are situated in a row along the posterior margin, not anterior to the posterior margin. It can be distinguished easily from C. distinctus by the absence of a spinula on the mesosternal furca. Although similar to C. kwanzanensis , it is distinguished from that species by the presence of three pairs of pronotal postero-marginal setae, and antennal segment III is dark. It is also distinguished easily from C. transeolineae ( Chen, 1979) , since the latter has: (i) almost equal head setae, (ii) ocellar setae III placed just behind hind margin of posterior ocelli, (iii) one pair of posteromarginal setae on pronotum.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |