Anapis nawchi, Dupérré & Tapia, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.1458814 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB533B6F-A661-46C6-9118-AAF22D7C7B96 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5996565 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D98E5A-193E-FF8F-E3F2-FAB878C30EF1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anapis nawchi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anapis nawchi View in CoL new species
Figs 30–37 View FIGURES 30–34 View FIGURES 35–37 , 54, 55 View FIGURES 54–61 , 62a View FIGURES 62–62 .
Material examined. Male holotype from Ecuador, Cotopaxi Province, OTONGA Biological Reserve (-00.41564 - 79.00425) 2,105m, 24.v–08.vi.2014, pitfall, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( QCAZ) . Paratypes: Ecuador, Cotopaxi Province, OTONGA Biological Reserve (-00.41564 -79.00425) 2,105m, 03–16. viii.2014, 1 ♀, pitfall, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( QCAZ) . Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, OTONGA Biological Reserve, Las Damas (-00.3951 -78.9810) 1,209m, 16.viii–03. ix.2014, 14 ♂ 2♀, pitfall, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( ZMH) .
Additional material examined. ECUADOR: Cotopaxi: OTONGA Biological Reserve (-00.41994 - 79.00623) 1,997m, 20–30. v.2014, 4 ♀, 24.v–08. vi. 2014, 2 ♀, 12. xi.2014, 2 ♀, 13. xi.2014, 2 ♀, general collecting, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( DTC, ZMH) ; 03–16. viii.2014, 5 ♀, beating, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré (ZMH). San Francisco de las Pampas, Sector Rio Esmeraldas, Casa César Tapia (-00.42414 -78.95719) 1,485m 13. ix.2013, 1 ♂ 2♀, sifting litter ( DTC) ; 08. v.2017, 2 ♀, general collecting, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré (ZMH). Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas: OTONGA Biological Reserve, Las Damas (-00.39506 -78.98100) 1,209m, 28.vi– 12. vii.2014, 14 ♂ 6♀, 12–23. vii.2014, 7 ♂ 1♀, 23.vii–05. viii.2014, 7 ♂ 1♀, 05–16. viii.2014, 5 ♂ 1♀, pitfall, E. Tapia, C. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( QCAZ, DTC, ZMH) ; La UniÓn del Toachi , Otongachi Reserve (-00.321295 -78.95163) 900m, 12–15.viii.2013, sifting litter, 4♂ 2♀, E. Tapia, N. Dupérré ( ZMH) .
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition taken from the Kichwa language meaning “pointed”.
Diagnosis. Males and females can be distinguished by their pointed abdomen ( Figs 35 View FIGURES 35–37 , 54, 55 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Furthermore, males are easily distinguished from all species by their long embolus ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–34 ); from Anapis chiriboga males are distinguished by their shorter embolus (± 2x the length of palpal bulb) and with one basal loop ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–34 , 54 View FIGURES 54–61 ), whereas the embolus is ḵ 2x the length of the palpal bulb and with two loops in A. chiriboga ( Platnick & Shadab, 1978; fig. 24; Fig. 58 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Females can be distinguished from A. calima with similar triangular abdomen, by their wide and transparent copulatory ducts with two loops ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ), narrow and with one loop in the latter species ( Platnick & Shadab, 1978; fig. 52).
Description. Male (holotype): Total length: 1.46; carapace length: 0.51; carapace width: 0.46; abdomen length: 0.95; abdomen width: 0.78; clypeus height: 0 19. Cephalothorax: Carapace orange; pars cephalica punctated with gray markings on dorsal surface and about the eye; cephalic groove punctated; pars thoracica punctated laterally, granulated dorsally ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Sternum orange-brown, suffused with dark gray, deeply punctated, longer than wide, covered with setae. Labral spur present. Clypeus orange-brown and punctated. Chelicerae orangebrown, punctated, excavated medially with one basal, one apical tooth and denticulate plate apically ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30–34 ). Eyes: 6 eyes, rounded; AME absent, ALE contiguous, ALE-PLE contiguous, LE-PME contiguous, PME contiguous. Abdomen: Pointed apically with orange dorsal scutum; dorsal soft portion with small, rounded setose sclerites; laterally suffused with 5–6 stripes of dark gray, alternating with rows of elongated non-setose sclerites ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 54–61 ); spinneret scutum complete. Legs: Orange; metatarsus I without cusps, tarsus I with one prolateral cusp ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–34 ); metatarsus II and tarsus II without cusp ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 30–34 ). Genitalia: Palpal patella with small ventrally curved retrolateral apophysis; tibia without trichobothrium, elongated, pointed retrolateral apophysis ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–34 ). Cymbium cup-shaped, excavated prolaterally ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–34 ). Embolus and conductor long and sinuous with one basal loop, conductor very faintly ridged apically ( Figs 30, 31, 31a View FIGURES 30–34 ).
Female (paratype): Total length: 1.86; carapace length: 0.65; carapace width: 0.55; abdomen length: 1.21; abdomen width: 0.92; clypeus height: 0.11. Cephalothorax: Same coloration and pattern of punctation as male ( Figs 35 View FIGURES 35–37 , 55 View FIGURES 54–61 ). Chelicerae and sternum as male. Labral spur present. Eyes: 6 eyes, rounded; AME absent, ALE separated by 1/4 their diameter, ALE-PLE contiguous, LE-PME separated by their diameter, PME contiguous. Abdomen: Pointed apically, uniformly light to dark gray without scutum, with white mark dorsally; numerous setose sclerites dorsally; laterally with rows of non-setose sclerites ( Figs 35 View FIGURES 35–37 , 55 View FIGURES 54–61 ); spinneret scutum complete. Legs: Orange; metatarsus and tarsus I with one cusp; metatarsus and tarsus II without cusps. Genitalia: Ventral scutum bright orange, visible through the scutum: a pair of rounded spermathecae and rounded copulatory openings separated by their diameter ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 35–37 ). Internal genitalia with large and transparent copulatory ducts, narrowing gradually, ending with two loops; spermathecae rounded; fertilization ducts long, directed basally ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 35–37 ).
Distribution. Ecuador: Cotopaxi and Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas Provinces.
Natural history. Most specimens were collected by pitfall trap between 1,209–1,800m, from May to August.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.