Bathynomus sp.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2022.2086835 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7017523 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D987D7-EF66-9229-B6B5-E928FE52FBA1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bathynomus sp. |
status |
|
Material
TMCD 003326 and TMCD 003334
One GoogleMaps ovigerous female, collected by bottom trawl in the northern South GoogleMaps China Sea GoogleMaps between North Vereker Bank GoogleMaps (221.061°N, 116.109°E) and Pratas Island GoogleMaps (20.717°N, 116.700°E) by the crew of Keelung-based fishing vessel Jin Ruiyi 37 on 17 June 2019 ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 ) voucher numbers TMCD003326 . One GoogleMaps male, captured in waters of the South GoogleMaps China Sea GoogleMaps (19.084°N, 115.250°E) by the crew of Keelung-based fishing vessel Jing yang on 12 May 2020; the water depth was about 420–550 m, TMCD003334 . TL 309 and 356 mm, CL 150 and 173 mm, wet weight 1100 and 1600 g, respectively ( Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Remarks
Two apparently sympatric species of Bathynomus are present in the material examined. Both of these had been identified as Bathynomus jamesi (Kou, Chen and Li, 2017) ; that identification was confirmed by COI data (NCBI Acc. No. MW575424 View Materials and MW577652 View Materials ).
The second apparent species, while having the same clypeus and pleonite characters as B. jamesi , differs from B. jamesi s. str. in a number of significant characters (state of B. jamesi in parentheses): the body is slender, with the pereon lateral margins relatively straight (vs convex); the pleotelson is 0.70 times as long as wide (vs 0.42–0.56); the pleotelson spines are flat and proximally broad (vs round, proximally narrow). These morphological character differences would be considered indicative of a separate species, but at present we are unable to discern further differentiating characters. Furthermore, COI data indicates that this material is conspecific with the South China Sea material identified as B. jamesi . At present we regard the identity of these specimens as inconclusive, and prefer to exclude the material from B. jamesi until further specimens are available to either evaluate variation within B. jamesi or confirm that the material represents a distinct species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |