Pycnogonum spatium Takahashi et al. 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4750.1.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:575B1970-C7B5-4688-9B41-99F046AFD3F1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3706315 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D687D4-7C0D-4133-FF51-F768FA4FD7CA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pycnogonum spatium Takahashi et al. 2007 |
status |
|
Pycnogonum spatium Takahashi et al. 2007 View in CoL
Figures 3 View FIGURE 3 C–D, 5A–F
Pycnogonum spatium Takahashi et al., 2007: 73–75 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 5
Material examined. Holotype, ICHUM3172 View Materials , Southeast of Amami Island , Kagoshima, Japan, 28°09.20’N, 129°31.50’E, 332–334 m, beam trawl, Y. Takahashi, 25 May 2004. GoogleMaps
Remarks. Although Takahashi et al. (2007) described P. spatium as having granular integument, the body integument being pitted ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ), and only the dorsal surface of legs being granulated and pitted ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ). The proboscis length was recorded as 0.47 mm, while it is actually 0.89 mm ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ). Takahashi et al. (2007) determined the P. spatium holotype to be a female based on gonopores being on the dorsal surface of coxa 2 of all legs ( Fig. 5F View FIGURE 5 ), however the present observation reveals that there is a gonopore on the ventrodistal surface of coxa 2 on each fourth leg ( Fig. 5E View FIGURE 5 ), which shows the trait of a male. In this case, we can suggest two possibilities, the first being that the specimen is a hermaphrodite and secondly the female gonopores were misdiagnosed and represent coxal pelliculae (vide Staples, 2007), in which case the specimen is a male belonging to the subgenus Nulloviger . To solve this problem, we need additional collection of specimens and research to distinguish the coxal pellicula from the gonopore.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pycnogonum spatium Takahashi et al. 2007
Lee, Damin & Kim, Won 2020 |