Apobaetis jaquelinae, De Lima & Cruz & Hamada, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.879.2167 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A49B65B5-F27A-44EC-9A13-A39BF72F6E61 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8155383 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/806D9CCD-9AB3-402E-9D58-FA64C2C1DEF4 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:806D9CCD-9AB3-402E-9D58-FA64C2C1DEF4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Apobaetis jaquelinae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Apobaetis jaquelinae sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:806D9CCD-9AB3-402E-9D58-FA64C2C1DEF4
Figs 1 View Fig , 6–8 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Apobaetis fiuzai View in CoL – Boldrini & Cruz 2014: 4.
Diagnosis
NYMPH. Characterized by a combination of the following characters: 1) labrum rectangular, distal medial margin with one protuberance; dorsal surface with 3 elongated and blunt medial setae near distal margin ( Fig. 7A–B View Fig ); 2) hypopharynx with lingua subcircular, with apical tuft of setae, length subequal to superlingua ( Fig. 7E View Fig ); 3) maxillary palp long 1.7× length of galea-lacinia; segment II without apical constriction ( Fig. 7F View Fig ); 4) labial palp with segment II with triangular distomedial projection with rounded apex, laterally directed; segment III rectangular, distal margin concave ( Fig. 7G View Fig ); 5) foreleg with anterior surface of femur with one row of 8 to 9 short concave setae slightly pectinated on apex; apex with 2 short concave setae slightly pectinated on apex; claw 0.6–0.7 × length of tarsus, with two row of denticles restricted to middle portion ( Fig. 8A–C View Fig ); 6) posterior margin of tergum IV with triangular and pointed spines in regular sizes ( Fig. 8D View Fig ); 7) paraproct with several marginal spines, posterolateral extension with blunt spines ( Fig. 8F View Fig ).
Etymology
The species name is a tribute to Dr Jaqueline Góes, from the Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, who was part of the team that developed and improved the viral genome sequencing protocols for the rapid sequencing of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV2).
Material examined
Holotype BRAZIL • nymph on slide; Rondônia, Teixeirópolis , Vale das Cachoeiras; 10º55′20.4″ S, 62º22′34.7″ W; 10 Jul. 2018; P. V. Cruz, N. Hamada and G. Desidério leg.; INPA. GoogleMaps
Paratypes BRAZIL • 2 nymphs on slide; same collection data as for holotype; INPA GoogleMaps .
Additional material
BRAZIL – Rondonia • 1 nymph on slide; Colorado do Oeste, Rio Cabixi ; 13º15′31.8″ S, 60º20′04.8″ W; 3 Sep. 2012; N. Hamada and R. Boldrini leg.; INPA GoogleMaps • 1 nymph on slide; Nova Londrina, Rio Urupá ; 11º02′05.8″ S, 62º08′34.1″ W; 9 Jul. 2018; P. V. Cruz, N. Hamada and G. Desidério leg.; INPA GoogleMaps .
Description
Nymph
LENGTH. Body: 2.5–2.8 mm.
HEAD. Antenna: flagellum with minute spines on apex of each flagellomere. Labrum ( Fig. 7A–B View Fig ): length about 0.6× of maximum width; distal medial margin with one protuberance, distolateral margin rounded; dorsal surface with 3 elongated and blunt medial setae near distal margin; medially with one row of long and thin setae near distal margin; long, thin and simple setae covering dorsal surface; ventral surface with one row of spine-like setae on distolateral and distal margins. Left mandible ( Fig. 7C View Fig ): incisors not fused; outer and inner set of incisors with 4 and 3 denticles, respectively; prostheca robust, bifurcated at apex, outer lobe robust, inner lobe slender with medial tuft of setae; margin between prostheca and mola concave; subtriangular process wide with short protuberance on distal margin; tuft of setae at base of subtriangular process; denticles of mola not constricted; lateral margin convex. Right mandible ( Fig. 7D View Fig ): incisors not fused; outer and inner set of incisors each with 3 denticles; prostheca slender, bifurcated at apex, tuft medial of minute setae; margin between prostheca and mola concave; tuft of setae at base of mola absent; denticles of mola not constricted; lateral margin convex. Hypopharynx ( Fig. 7E View Fig ): lingua subcircular, apex covered with short setae, subequal to superlingua; superlingua not expanded, with short, thin, simple setae over distolateral and distal margin. Maxilla ( Fig. 7F View Fig ): maxillary palp long, 1.7× length of galea-lacinia; segment I 0.6× length of galea-lacinia; segment II tapering slightly from base to apex, with thin and simple setae scattered on surface, without apical constriction; medial margin of galea-lacinia with 2 to 3 spine-like setae. Labium ( Fig. 7G View Fig ): glossa subcircular, robust, narrowing apically, subequal to paraglossa; dorsal surface with one longitudinal row of 4 short spine-like setae near inner margin; 2 short spine-like setae near internal margin, thin and simple setae and one robust spine-like setae on apex; longitudinal row of 9 robust spine-like setae on apical ⅔ near outer margin; ventral surface covered with long, thin and simple setae. Paraglossa curved inward; dorsal surface with long and robust spine-like setae on apex; longitudinal row of 15 long spine-like setae on apical ⅔ near outer margin and one longitudinal row of 5 long and robust spine-like setae on apical ⅔ near inner margin; ventral surface with one longitudinal row of 5 robust and long spine-like setae on apical ⅔. Labial palp with segment I 0.7 × length of segments II and III combined, covered with micropores (not illustrated); segment II with outer margin covered with thin, long and simple setae, inner margin bare; segment II with triangular distomedial projection, with rounded apex, laterally directed; ventral surface of distomedial projection with thin, long and simple tuft of setae; segment III rectangular, with concave distal margin, length 0.6× width, covered with thin, long and simple setae on outer margin, dorsally with one row of 11 to 13 spine-like setae in different sizes near distal margin, ventrally with 8 to 10 spine-like setae in different sizes near distal margin.
THORAX. Holotype pigment ( Fig. 6A–B View Fig ): light yellow, with brown marks; forewing pads with basal brown mark. Paratype pigment, nymph female ( Fig. 6C View Fig ): light yellow, with lateral brown mark. Foreleg ( Fig. 8A–C View Fig ). Femur: anterior surface with one row with 8 to 9 short concave setae slightly pectinated on apex near dorsal margin; apex of femur with 2 short concave setae slightly pectinated on apex; ventral margin with one row of 10 to 12 spine-like setae of different sizes. Tibia: dorsal margin bare; ventral margin with one row of 10 to 11 spine-like setae. Patella-tibial suture present, from dorsal margin to ventral margin. Tarsus: dorsal margin bare; ventral margin with one row of 11 to 12 spine-like setae. Claw: 0.6–0.7× length of tarsus, with two rows of denticles restricted to middle portion. Middle and hindleg similar to foreleg.
ABDOMEN. Holotype pigment, nymph male ( Fig. 6A–B View Fig ): tergum V with lateral brown mark; posterior margin of tergum V with medial brown mark and sublateral brown spots; tergum VI with central brown mark; anterior margin of tergum VII with medial brown mark and short spots; terga VIII and IX with lateral brown mark and short spots; sterna II–VII with anterolateral brown mark and with lateral brown mark; sternum VIII brown; sternum IX with anterior margin brown mark. Paratype pigment. Nymph female ( Fig. 6C View Fig ). Tergum II with medial brown mark; terga III and V with lateral brown mark; terga II– IV covered by reddish brown pigmentation. Tergum IV ( Fig. 8D View Fig ): surface covered by triangular scale-like projections and micropores; posterior margin with triangular and pointed spines, in regular sizes. Gill ( Fig. 8E View Fig ): triangular apex, trachea conspicuous; long length, extending to half of third subsequent tergum. Paraproct ( Fig. 8F View Fig ) with several marginal spines. Posterolateral extension with blunt spines. Cerci ( Fig. 8G View Fig ) with spines in all segments. Paracercus ( Fig. 8H View Fig ) with prominent spines in all segments.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Apobaetis jaquelinae
De Lima, Cláudia R. T., Cruz, Paulo Vilela & Hamada, Neusa 2023 |
Apobaetis fiuzai
Boldrini R. & Cruz P. V. 2014: 4 |