Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4801.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00A1A2A5-25B1-4D0E-9311-A77274F72278 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D58377-FFB9-FF83-C6D4-FB6BFC52A688 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2020-08-19 00:19:49, last updated 2020-08-19 00:19:49) |
scientific name |
Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995 |
status |
|
Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995
Nature & Insects 30(14): 33.
Labels : “ Yunnan Province (in Chinese character)/Dokanmura (= Tuguancun, in Chinese character)/ 24-V-1995 / S MURAYAMA,” “ Pedesta masuri-/ensis/cuneoma/culata/ HOLOTYPE.”
A male specimen was designated as the holotype by Murayama (1995), and the specimen was retrieved in LBM ( Figs. 25–27; Dried Insect Database Reg. no. 1500022032).
Huang (2011) treated cuneomaculata as a junior subjective synonym of Thoressa masuriensis tali (Swinhoe, 1912) . We agree that cuneomaculata is a synonym of tali . The nominate subspecies masuriensis Moore, 1878 and subspecies tali are significantly different in appearance ( Figs. 46–49), but Evans (1949) considered them as conspecific. However, masuriensis ( Figs. 46–47, 50) and tali ( Figs. 48–49, 51) are two different species, supported by distinctions in genitalia ( Figs. 50–51) and the genetic divergence of COI barcode between them (12–13%, Table 1). They may be separated by the following features: 1) uncus bent with blunt tips in masuriensis ( Fig. 50) versus straight with narrowed tips in tali ( Fig. 51); 2) left harpe with inner one of terminal processes as small lobe in masuriensis ( Fig. 50) versus produced serrate teeth in tali ( Fig. 51); 3) phallus short and stout in masuriensis ( Fig. 50) versus elongate and slender in tali ( Fig. 51). Those masuriensis molecular samples in China ( Li et al. 2019) all belong to tali .
Huang (2011) was correct in merging the Chinese taxa of Thoressa Swinhoe, 1913 and Pedesta Hemming, 1934 . His taxonomic treatment, however, was not complete because he did not include the type species of Thoressa . The genus Thoressa sensu Evans (1949) was polyphyletic and is now divided into three genera based on molecular evidences ( Huang et al. 2019). Those species assigned to Thoressa by Huang (2011) indeed should be included in Pedesta . Therefore, Pedesta tali comb. nov. is the valid name for this taxon.
Evans, W. H. (1949) A Catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia and Australia in the British Museum (Natural History). BMNH, London, 502 pp., 53 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 105941
Huang, H. (2011) Notes on the genus Thoressa Swinhoe, [1913] from China, with the description of a new species. Atalanta, 42, 193 - 200.
Huang, Z. F., Chiba, H., Jin, J., Kizhakke, A. G., Wang, M., Kunte, K. & Fan, X. L. (2019) A multilocus phylogenetic framework of the tribe Aeromachini (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae), with implication for taxonomy and biogeography. Systematic Entomology, 44, 163 - 178. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / syen. 12322
Li, Y. Y., Zhu, J. Q., Ge, C., Wang, Y., Zhao, Z. M., Ma, S. J., Hoffmann, A. A., Endersby, N. M., Liu, Q. X., Yu, W. D. & Jiang, W. B. (2019) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the butterfly tribe Aeromachini Tutt (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) from China. Cells, 8, 294. https: // doi. org / 10.3390 / cells 8040294
Murayama, S. (1995) Descriptions of 3 new species and 5 new races of Chinese butterflies from Yunnan Province. Nature & Insects, 30 (14), 32 - 35 [in Japanese]
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.