Jucancistrocerus, Bluthgen, 1938
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5105.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:75AC29AF-CA8F-48B3-8458-E305678D0540 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6343473 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D5340A-CC4B-FA39-83B6-FB9ECBACFF04 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Jucancistrocerus |
status |
|
Key to the species of Jucancistrocerus View in CoL View at ENA and the related genera from China
1. Pretegular keel absent on the pronotum.................................................................... 2
- Pretegular keel present and developed on the pronotum....................................................... 8
2. Tegula inconspicuously, finely and superficially punctate, usually with only two larger translucent spots ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 65–72 )............................................... Eustenancistrocerus (Parastenancistrocerus) amadanensis ( de Saussure, 1855) View in CoL
- Tegula with dense, strong, sieve-like translucent punctures ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 10–16 , 51 View FIGURES 47–55 , 60)....................................... 3
3. T1 short and distinctly wider than long; transverse edge of T1 lying on the level of horizontal area approximately in the middle of this tergum ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 56–64 )................. Eustenancistrocerus (Eustenancistrocerus) askhabadensis ( Radoszkowski, 1886) View in CoL
- T1 elongate and slightly wider than long, or if distinctly wider than long, dorsal surface of propodeum posteriorly with one supercarina extending to lateral side ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–9 , 14); transverse edge of T1 lower than the horizontal surface and closer to the base of this tergum ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1–9 , 15, 22 View FIGURES 17–25 , 37, 52 View FIGURES 47–55 )............................................... Jucancistrocerus Blüthgen View in CoL 4
4. Clypeus shallowly emarginated at apex ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–9 , 11); T1 much wider than long and somewhat narrower than (more than 0.8×) T2 ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1–9 , 15)....................................................................................... 5
- Clypeus more deeply emarginated at apex, and tooth-like laterally ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 34–35, 45–46, 49–50 View FIGURES 47–55 ); T1 elongate, a little wider than long and distinctly narrower than (less than 0.8×) T2 ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 17–25 , 37, 52 View FIGURES 47–55 ).................................. 6
5. Body more coarsely punctate ( Figs 1–4, 8–9 View FIGURES 1–9 ); apical margin of clypeus emarginated and incised ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–9 ); mesoscutum without or with one smaller subapical spot ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–9 )..................... J. (Eremodynerus) atrofasciatus ( Morawitz, 1885) View in CoL
- Body less sparsely punctate ( Figs 10–12, 15–16 View FIGURES 10–16 ); apical margin of clypeus slightly emarginated; mesoscutum medially with one big subapical spot ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 10–16 ).............................................. J. (E.) chotanensis ( Blüthgen, 1942) View in CoL
6. Clypeus coarsely punctate in both sexes, and apex relatively narrower (in female apical width: depth of emargination= 2.89, in male apical width: depth of emargination=2.57) ( Figs 49–50 View FIGURES 47–55 ).......... J. (Jucancistrocerus) tachkensis ( Dalla Torre, 1889) View in CoL
- Clypeus less sparsely punctate, and apex wider (in female apical width: depth of emargination=3.32–3.96, in male apical width: depth of emargination=1.99–2.25) ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 30–31, 34–35, 45–46)........................................... 7
7. Both female and male clypeus widely and shallowly emarginated at apex ( Figs 34–35 View FIGURES 32–40 , 45–46); male A13 hooked backward not reaching the base of A11 ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 32–40 ); volsella ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 32–40 ) apically narrower and sharper..... J. (J.) angustifrons ( Kostylev, 1940) View in CoL
- Both female and male clypeus more narrowly and deeply emarginated at apex ( Figs 19–20 View FIGURES 17–25 , 30–31); male A13 hooked backward extending to the base of A11 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 17–25 ); volsella ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 17–25 ) apically wider and blunter...... J. (J.) alashanicus Kurzenko, 1977 View in CoL
8. Transverse edge of T1 lying below the level of horizontal surface of this tergum ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 81–89 ); T3 much coarser in the distal portion than at the base of T2 ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 81–89 ); clypeus truncate and narrow at apex (83–84)...................................................................................................... Tachyancistrocerus schmidti (Kokujev, 1912) View in CoL
- Transverse edge of T1 lying at the level of the horizontal surface ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 73–80 ); punctures on T3 not coarser than those of T2 ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 73–80 ); clypeus deeply and widely emarginted at apex ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 73–80 )............................................................................................. Stenancistrocerus (Paratropancistrocerus) transcaspicus (Kostylev, 1934) View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.