Scatophila contaminata (Stenhammar)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5487.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:50AC1672-FC20-4502-8D8A-4BCAE95F719B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13243594 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187B7-3A5E-7B5E-FF4E-FF7354FDF85E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scatophila contaminata (Stenhammar) |
status |
|
1. Scatophila contaminata (Stenhammar) View in CoL
Figs. 5–8 View FIGURES 3–5 View FIGURES 6–10 , 11–13 View FIGURES 11–13 , 30 View FIGURE 30
Ephydra (Ephydra) contaminata Stenhammar 1844: 185 View in CoL .
Scatophila contaminata View in CoL .— Becker 1896: 240 [generic combination].— Zatwarnicki 1987: 280–281, 291 [figures of ♂ genitalia].— Zatwarnicki and Mathis 1994: 362 [phylogeny, contaminata View in CoL group].— Mathis and Zatwarnicki 1995: 282 [world catalog].
Scatophila halterata Becker 1896: 245 View in CoL .— Zatwarnicki 1987: 280 [synonymy].
Diagnosis.—This species is distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: Body generally very dark, blackish brown to black; small shore flies, body length 1.10–1.60 mm.
Head: ( Figs. 5–7 View FIGURES 3–5 View FIGURES 6–10 ): Mesofrons anterior of ocellar triangle dark gray; fronto-orbits brownish black; parafrons charcoal to grayish charcoal. Face of ♂ normally protuberant (best seen in lateral view); face mostly brownish black but with some gray microtomentum in antennal grooves and slightly anteriorly; face of female like that of male; gena very short, height slightly more than half height of basal flagellomere; gena-to-eye ratio 0.12.
Thorax ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 3–5 , 8 View FIGURES 6–10 ): Scutum mostly dark brown, subshiny to shiny, with some partially grayish coloration as vitta anteriorly between setal tracks and posteromedially; scutellar disc extensively brownish black; pleural region mostly dark brown, subshiny dorsally, becoming more grayish, microtomentose anteriorly and ventrally; presutural dorsocentral setae lacking. Wing ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 6–10 ), including base, generally brown, infuscate with whitened spots conspicuous; cell r 1 lacking spots; cell r 3 with large rectangular spot medially and a spot subapically; cell r 5 with 3 spots; costal vein ratio 0.34–0.37; M 1 vein ratio 0.57–0.60. Knob of halter blackish. Femora and tibiae black; male midfemur lacking row of spine-like setulae along posteroventral margin; tarsi brownish black.
Abdomen: Tergites uniformly black, shiny. Male terminalia ( Figs. 11–13 View FIGURES 11–13 ): Epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–13 ) generally oval except for truncate ventral margin, width nearly 0.76 epandrial height, lateral margins shallowly and regularly curved, width of truncate ventral margin about equal to width of cercal opening; dorsal margin of epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–13 ) somewhat evenly and shallowly rounded; epandrial setae about equal in length, sparser laterally, more abundant along ventral margin; height of cercal opening about half epandrial height; cerci in posterior view ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–13 ) ovate; aedeagus in lateral view ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–13 ) slipper-like, narrowly rounded basally, ventral margin rounded, becoming narrower posteriorly, posterior apex narrowly rounded, dorsal margin moderately and uniformly excavated, cavity nearly equal to width of opening, in ventral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11–13 ) rectangular with rounded corners; ventral aedeagal process lacking; phallapodeme in lateral view ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–13 ) elongate, narrow, shallowly curved, with keel subapically to dorsal apex, in ventral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11–13 ) narrow, lacking T-shaped crossbar, broad basally, thereafter tapered to just before posterior apex, posterior apex trifurcate, middle process slightly more robust than lateral processes; postgonite in lateral view ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–13 ) generally V-shaped, dorsal arm or extension irregularly rectangular with a posterior, narrowed process at apical ¼, apical process bearing setulae, ventral arm narrow, elongate, nearly straight, in ventral view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11–13 ) with posterior processes narrowly rod-like, very slightly tumid apically; neohypandrium in lateral view ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 11–13 ) narrow, nearly straight, rod-like, elongate.
Type Material.—The lectotype male of Ephydra (Ephydra) contaminata Stenhammar , designated herein, is labeled “ E. contaminata St [enhammar]. ♂ a Stenh.[ammar; = by Stenhammar; handwritten]/MZLU-DIPT 000 67432 [“67432” handwritten]/ LECTOTYPE ♂ Ephydra contaminata Stenhammar designated by Zatwarnicki & Mathis” preserved in MZLU.
Other Specimens Examined.— UNITED STATES. ALASKA. Fairbanks North Star: Olnes, on road to Livegood (65°04.4'N, 147°40.6'W), 11 Jul 1948 GoogleMaps , S. Lienk (1♀; USNM). Juneau: Douglas Island , Fish Creek (58°19.8'N, 134°35.7'W), 20 Jul 2011 GoogleMaps , D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂; USNM). Valdez-Cordova ( Census Area ): Gulkana River (19.3 km N Glennallen; 62°16.1'N, 145°23.1'W), 7 Aug 2012 GoogleMaps , D. and W. N. Mathis (2♂, 5♀; USNM) .
WASHINGTON. Thurston: Olympia (47°02.3'N, 122°54'W), 9 May 1971, W. N. Mathis (1♂; USNM) GoogleMaps .
Type Locality.— Sweden .
Distribution ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ).— Nearctic : United States (Alaska, Washington). Palearctic: Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia (European Territory), Sweden.
Remarks.—This is the first record of this species from the Nearctic Region. As suggested by the species name, this species is placed in the contaminata group. This species is generally very darkly colored, blackish brown to black, and the abdominal tergites are shiny, lacking microtomentum.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Scatellini |
Genus |
Scatophila contaminata (Stenhammar)
Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz & Mathis, Wayne N. 2024 |
Scatophila contaminata
Mathis, W. N. & Zatwarnicki, T. 1995: 282 |
Zatwarnicki, T. & Mathis, W. N. 1994: 362 |
Zatwarnicki, T. 1987: 280 |
Becker, T. 1896: 240 |
Scatophila halterata
Zatwarnicki, T. 1987: 280 |
Becker, T. 1896: 245 |
Ephydra (Ephydra) contaminata
Stenhammar, C. 1844: 185 |