Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5487.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:50AC1672-FC20-4502-8D8A-4BCAE95F719B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13287174 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187B7-3A1A-7B18-FF4E-FB5955BEF9C3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler |
status |
|
19. Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler View in CoL
Figs. 30 View FIGURE 30 , 157 View FIGURES 156–158 , 168–174 View FIGURES 168–171 View FIGURES 172–174 , 176 View FIGURES 175–179
Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler 1954: 189 View in CoL .— Wirth 1965: 758 [ Nearctic catalog].— Zatwarnicki 1987: 291 [checklist].— Zatwarnicki and Mathis 1994: 365 [phylogeny, quadriguttata group].— Mathis and Zatwarnicki 1995: 282 [world catalog].
Diagnosis.—This species is similar to congeners in the quadriguttata group but is distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: Generally grayish; small shore flies, body length 1.50–1.90 mm.
Head ( Figs. 168–171 View FIGURES 168–171 ): Mesofrons gray; distance between insertion of lateroclinate seta and medial vertical seta only slightly greater than distance between vertical setae. Face of ♂ convex, ventral portion projected, somewhat conical, setulae on either side somewhat clustered but not strongly expressed. Gena relatively high, gena-to-eye ratio 0.32–0.37.
Thorax ( Figs. 157 View FIGURES 156–158 , 176 View FIGURES 175–179 ): Mesonotum ( Fig. 176 View FIGURES 175–179 ) generally gray with some irregular brownish pattern medially, variable; scutellum gray. Wing ( Fig. 157 View FIGURES 156–158 ) generally pale colored, spots pale; costal vein ratio 0.21–0.25; M 1 vein ratio 0.60–0.68; knob of halter yellow. Legs generally dark colored; femora and tibiae dark with gray microtomentum; male midfemur lacking row of spine-like setulae along posteroventral margin; tarsi blackish.
Abdomen ( Figs. 172–174 View FIGURES 172–174 ): Abdomen mostly black, subshiny to shiny, with small gray to whitish gray area laterally toward posterior margin on basal 1–3 tergites. Male terminalia ( Figs. 172–174 View FIGURES 172–174 ): Epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 172–174 ) generally irregularly and broadly rectangular to oval, width about 3/4 height, ventral margin somewhat truncate ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 172–174 ) with medial, shallowly rounded projection, ventral margin distinctly wider than width of cercal opening; dorsal margin of epandrium in posterior view ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 172–174 ) rounded, lateral margins widest at midheight, thereafter ventrally tapered to ventral margin, ventrolateral corners rounded; epandrial setulae about equal in length, sparser medially and laterally, those along ventral margin more abundant but shorter; height of cercal opening more than 1/3 epandrial height; cerci in posterior view ( Fig. 172 View FIGURES 172–174 ) semihemispherical, slightly more narrowed dorsally; aedeagus in lateral view ( Fig. 174 View FIGURES 172–174 ) obtusely pointed basally, forming irregular rectangle, ventral margin shallowly rounded, posterior margin broadly rounded, right angle at posterodorsal corner, dorsal margin deeply and widely excavated basally, cavity deeper than width of opening, in ventral view ( Fig. 173 View FIGURES 172–174 ) ovately rectangular, lateral margins shallowly curved, wider basally, tapered gradually toward apex, apical margin truncated and with a long, acutely pointed, medial point; ventral aedeagal process shallowly C-shaped; phallapodeme in lateral view ( Fig. 174 View FIGURES 172–174 ) L-shaped, elongate, narrow, parallel sided, dorsal half gently and shallowly curved, ventral extension nearly straight, elongate, narrow, tapered, in ventral view ( Fig. 173 View FIGURES 172–174 ) T-shaped, width of basal crossbar shorter than length of medial process, crossbar nearly straight, nearly as thick as medial process, medial process with lateral margins shallowly sinuous; postgonite in lateral view ( Fig. 174 View FIGURES 172–174 ) irregularly V-shaped, with dorsal arm irregularly rectangular, anterodorsal corner produced to narrow, digitiform extension, anterodorsal corner moderately produced with posterodorsal angle produced to short, pointed extension, ventral arm elongate, thin, parallel-sided, in ventral view ( Fig. 173 View FIGURES 172–174 ) with base slopping laterally, nearly straight, not excavated, posterior, thumb-like extensions narrowly developed, apices produced laterally, bearing setulae along medial margin; neohypandrium in lateral view ( Fig. 174 View FIGURES 172–174 ) narrow, elongate, distinctly C-shaped.
Type Material.—The holotype male of Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler is labeled “Weott[,] Calif[ornia][,] 7-24-51 [24 Jul 1951][handwritten]/M. R. Wheeler/ HOLOTYPE Scatophila conifera Stvt & Whlr [pink]/6683 TYPE [dark pink; number handwritten].” The holotype is double mounted (glued to a paper point), is in good condition, and is deposited in the ANSP (6683).
Other Specimens Examined.— UNITED STATES. CALIFORNIA. Humboldt: Weott (40°19.3'N, 123°55.3'W), 24 Jul 1951 GoogleMaps , M. R. Wheeler (5♂, 2♀; USNM) .
Type Locality.— United States. California. Humboldt: Weott (40°19.3'N, 123°55.3'W) GoogleMaps .
Distribution ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 ).— Nearctic : United States (California).
Remarks.—This species is placed in the quadriguttata group and is known thus far only from the type series that was collected in Humboldt County, California.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Scatellini |
Genus |
Scatophila conifera Sturtevant and Wheeler
Zatwarnicki, Tadeusz & Mathis, Wayne N. 2024 |
Scatophila conifera
Mathis, W. N. & Zatwarnicki, T. 1995: 282 |
Zatwarnicki, T. & Mathis, W. N. 1994: 365 |
Zatwarnicki, T. 1987: 291 |
Wirth, W. W. 1965: 758 |
Sturtevant, A. H. & Wheeler, M. R. 1954: 189 |