Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4345.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D070D1A-4F99-4EEF-BE30-7A88430F8AA7 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6013647 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087CA-FF64-67BA-35C0-73381F86FBC9 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 ) |
| status |
|
1. Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839) View in CoL
Monochamus ruber Hope, 1839: 43 View in CoL ; Hope, 1840b: 441, pl. 30, fig. 5 (♂).
Type Locality: India: Assam (ST ♂); OUM.
Ithocritus ruber Breuning, 1956l View in CoL : 354, fig. 1; Lin & Jiroux, 2011: 108, figs 13–18 (Distr.); Ohbayashi & Lin, 2012: 238, figs 1 (ST ♂), 2 (♂), 3–5 (♀) (Distr.).
Distribution: India (Assam; Sikkim), Bangladesh: Silhet & Myanmar: Kachin, Mandaley.
Pseudapriona Breuning, 1936: 304 View in CoL (type sp.: Pseudapriona flavoantennata Breuning, 1936 View in CoL ); Parajoesse Breuning, 1982a: 21 (type sp.: Parajoesse nagaensis Breuning, 1982 View in CoL ).
| OUM |
Oxford University Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Ithocritus ruber ( Hope, 1839 )
| Gupta, Rajeev & Vitali, Francesco 2017 |
Ithocritus ruber
| Ohbayashi 2012: 238 |
| Lin 2011: 108 |
| Breuning 1956: 354 |
Pseudapriona
| Breuning 1982: 21 |
| Breuning 1936: 304 |
Monochamus ruber
| Hope 1840: 441 |
| Hope 1839: 43 |