Anatoma laevapex, Hoffman & Kniesz & Arbizu & Kihara, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.826.1841 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09635D60-D052-4C7A-B4B7-1F1962D08051 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6787454 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FCBC4FC9-05DD-4472-9D3F-336EE8A17002 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:FCBC4FC9-05DD-4472-9D3F-336EE8A17002 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anatoma laevapex |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anatoma laevapex View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FCBC4FC9-05DD-4472-9D3F-336EE8A17002
Figs 8–10 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Etymology
The species name ‘ laevapex ’ refers to the smooth initial teleoconch.
Type material
Holotype INDIAN OCEAN • SEIR; 27.65° S, 73.88° E; depth 2469 m; 11 Dec. 2019; stn INDEX19_127RO; spec. I19 _Ma_74, SEM, Fig. 8A–C View Fig ; SMF 358989 About SMF . GoogleMaps
Paratypes INDIAN OCEAN • 1 specimen (paratype 1); same location data as for holotype; spec. I19 _Ma_75, SEM, Fig. 8D–E View Fig ; SMF 358990 About SMF GoogleMaps • 1 specimen (paratype 2); same location data as for holotype; spec. I19 _Ma_76, SEM, Fig. 8F–G View Fig ; SMF 358991 About SMF GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
INDIAN OCEAN • 24 specimens; CIR; 23.87° S, 69.62° E; depth 2980 m; 12 Nov. 2019; stn INDEX19_033RO; specs I19 _Ma_8– 26, I19 _Ma_95–99 GoogleMaps • 1 specimen; CIR; 23.78° S, 69.55° E; depth 3049 m; 2 Dec. 2015; INDEX15_49R; spec. I15 _Ma_2 GoogleMaps • 4 specimens; SEIR; 27.63° S, 73.87° E; depth 2532 m; 5 Dec. 2019; stn INDEX19_102RO; specs I19 _Ma_ 62, I19 _Ma_ 65, I19 _Ma_69–70 GoogleMaps • 2 specimens; SEIR; 27.65° S, 73.88° E; depth 2469–2471 m; 11 Dec. 2019; stn INDEX19_127RO; specs I19 _Ma_72–73 GoogleMaps .
Shell description
PROTOCONCH ( Fig. 8C View Fig ). One slightly elevated whorl, pointed nucleus, coarsely pitted sculpture; sharp lip with flexuous margin at the transition to teleoconch: transition clear by change in sculpture; diameter 0.19 mm.
TELEOCONCH ( Fig. 8A–B View Fig ). Flattened spire, disk-shaped outline with sloping weakly convex shoulders, smooth apex, protruding margins of selenizone; flexuous axial ribs; pear-shaped aperture with slit; suture deep. Height 1.0 mm, width 1.5 mm, height of aperture 0.67 mm (67% of total height); colour opaque grayish white. 2¼ regular whorls with convex shoulder area and rounded base, selenizone above periphery; distance between base of selenizone and suture small but increasing regularly. Teleoconch I from protoconch to start of selenizone: one convex whorl, decending below protoconch; smooth, flexuous growth lines; no spiral cord. Teleoconch II with selenizone: 44 regular weak axial ribs on first whorl, last ¼ whorl of body whorl with 17 axial ribs; ribs at regular spacing. Smooth margins of selenizone sharply protruding outwards, axial ribs absent on margins; inside margins smooth. Frequency of axial ribs below selenizone similar to that above; rough growth lines between ribs. Umbilicus open, tortuous and deep; steep spiral keel to base of columellar callus ( Fig. 8A View Fig of holotype and 8D, F–G of paratypes).
APERTURE ( Fig. 8B View Fig ). Rounded base, columella and parietal area; flattened shoulder, funnel-shaped selenizone, pointed union with penultimate whorl. Lip sharp, strongly reclining at union with penultimate whorl, protruding at upper shoulder and columella, thin reclining callus at parietal area; disk-shaped lower lip; slit above periphery, slit ¼ whorl deep with flattened sharp margins above and below. Callus thin; inside aperture smooth.
VARIATION. Little morphological variation of the shell. 40–50 axial ribs on body whorl. Adult height range 0.9–1.0 mm; width range 1.3–1.5 mm; H/W ratio range 0.65–0.70.
Anatomical description
Body is translucent white anteriorly with orange-brown internal organs in the visceral mass; white radula visible inside translucent neck area. Snout smooth, broad, flattened with two symmetrical lobes in front covered by one flat convex margin on the antero-dorsal part of the snout ( Fig. 9D–E View Fig ). No eyes observed. Pair of broad cephalic tentacles, tapered, with six rounded lobes, deeply folded between lobes, tip blunt, non-papillate. Foot small in contracted form, with irregular surface. Epipodium with five pairs of appendages ( Fig. 9D–E View Fig ). Anteriorly, three pairs of epipodial tentacles or possibly small ESOs,
marginally papillate. Posteriorly, pair of large ESOs and pair of small epipodial tentacles below the operculum. Mantle smooth with rounded margin, non-papillate.
OPERCULUM ( Fig. 9 View Fig ). Yellowish transparent, thin, corneous, multispiral with central nucleus, number of whorls uncertain.
RADULA ( Fig. 10 View Fig ). With central, lateral and marginal teeth arrangement: 21–4–1–4–21; width 0.15 mm. Central cusped tooth with 5 curved denticles ( Fig. 10A View Fig ), largest central denticle, smaller towards margin; 4 lateral teeth on either side with curved tips and 2 denticles on each tooth, proximal denticle larger than distal denticle; 21 marginal teeth ( Fig. 10C View Fig ), proximal marginal teeth with 1–3 hooked (curved) denticles ( Fig. 10E View Fig ), distal marginal teeth ending in strongly curved cusp with 6–10 symmetricallyplaced, curved denticles ( Fig. 10D View Fig ).
Distribution
Central and SE Indian Ridge, 23– 28° S, 69– 74° E, depth 2469–3049 m.
Habitat
Living on rocky surface with bacterial mats near active and inactive vents. Shells frequently covered by red bacterial deposit.
Remarks
Shells, anterior soft parts and radulae of Anatoma laevapex sp. nov. are similar to those from Anatoma declivis sp. nov. However, the shell of the latter species has fewer and coarser axial ribs including on teleoconch I; its protoconch is sunken. The shell differences with the similar Anatoma finlayi (Powell, 1937) and other known species in the Indian Ocean are mentioned under the remarks of Anatoma declivis sp. nov.
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |