Geomyphilus rubiginosus ( Horn, 1870 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5169501 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:749655B7-5F26-4C47-9292-F97C5AAE59FF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF87FE-9573-FFE8-FF27-FA5EA01C5F84 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Geomyphilus rubiginosus ( Horn, 1870 ) |
status |
|
Geomyphilus rubiginosus ( Horn, 1870)
( Fig. 36–40 View Figures 31–40 )
Aphodius rubiginosus Horn, 1870: 127 ; 1887: 39.
Aphodius (Koshantschikovius) rubiginosus ; Schmidt 1913: 150; Dellacasa 1988: 191.
Geomyphilus rubiginosus ; Gordon and Skelley 2007: 400.
Type locality. Camp Grant, San Pedro River, Arizona [ U.S.A.].
Type repository. Museum of Comparative Zoology. Harvard University, Cambridge. MA ( U.S.A.) (type not examined).
Redescription. Length 4.0–5.0 mm; moderately elongate; moderately convex, feebly shiny, glabrous. Red to dark brown; epistome and pronotal disc slightly darker; antennal club rufo-testaceous. Head with epistome slightly convex on disc, antero-medially depressed toward clypeal margin, densely almost evenly punctured, punctures somewhat coarser distally; clypeus broadly sinuate at middle, subangulate at sides, lateral margins regularly arcuate, thinly bordered, edge slightly raised, glabrous; genae obtusely round, shortly sparsely ciliate, protruding from the eyes; frontal suture barely distinct and faintly tuberculate; front evenly coarsely rather densely punctured. Pronotum transverse, moderately convex, not explanate at sides, coarsely and densely dually punctured; large punctures, two times larger than small, not denser on sides and lacking on disc; small punctures almost evenly scattered throughout; lateral margins feebly arcuate, rather thinly bordered, edge glabrous; hind angles obtuse; base regularly arcuate, thinly bordered. Scutellum somewhat convex, finely alutaceous, coarsely irregularly punctured on basal two thirds. Elytra feebly widened posteriorly; striae fine, moderately impressed, closely punc- tured, crenulate; interstriae almost flat, rather coarsely irregularly punctured. Hind tibiae upper spur shorter than first tarsal segment; latter almost as long as following three segments combined. Male: fore tibiae spur relatively stout, abruptly downward curved; head and pronotum more transverse, less convex and less densely punctured; metasternal plate distinctly excavate; aedeagus Fig. 39–40 View Figures 31–40 . Female: fore tibiae spur slender and feebly arcuate; head and pronotum narrower, more convex and more densely punctured; metasternal plate almost flat.
Material examined. U.S.A.: Arizona: Wickenburg-Simpson Ranch, Maricopa, 12S 34.0765E 37.59185N UTM, 16–23.I.2008, 2013 ft., leg. P. Kaufman, deer dung baited pitfall in Thomomys bottae burrow (6 exx., DCGI).
Distribution. U.S.A. (Arizona).
Biology. Almost certainly a rodent burrows associate species collected from January to April. Trapped from burrows and reared from dung of Thomomys bottae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Geomyphilus rubiginosus ( Horn, 1870 )
Dellacasa, Marco, Dellacasa, Giovanni, Skelley, Paul E. & Gordon, Robert D. 2017 |
Geomyphilus rubiginosus
Gordon, R. D. & P. E. Skelley 2007: 400 |
Aphodius (Koshantschikovius) rubiginosus
Dellacasa, M. 1988: 191 |
Schmidt, A. 1913: 150 |
Aphodius rubiginosus
Horn, G. H. 1887: 39 |
Horn, G. H. 1870: 127 |