Radfordia (Microtimyobia) golenishchevi, Bochkov, 2011
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2954.1.1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF8784-FF9C-CA64-FF3E-FBA315BFFBA7 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Radfordia (Microtimyobia) golenishchevi |
| status |
|
Key to species of the subgenus Microtimyobia Fain and Lukoschus, 1976
Females
In some couplets characters of female TN are included
(Females of R. (M.) golenishchevi sp. nov. and R. (M.) pitymys sp. nov. are sheathed in the TN skin and, therefore, many of their characters are not discernible)
1. Setae 2a more than 3 times longer than 2b ................................................................. 3
- Setae 2a more than 3 times shorter than 2b ................................................................ 2
2. Subcapitular setae m lanceolate. Subcapitulum ventrally with pair of distinct lobes. Distance d1-d2 about 2 times shorter than c1-d1. Setae e1 and f1 filiform. Setae e2 much shorter and narrower than vi. Setae 3a subequal to 2b .............................................................................. R. (M.) zibethicalis ( Radford, 1936) ( Figs. 42 View FIGURE 42 , 44A, B View FIGURE 44 )
- Subcapitular setae m with 3 tines. Subcapitulum ventrally without lobes. Distance d1-d2 and c1-d1 subequal. Setae e1 and f1 narrow lanceolate. Setae e2 subequal to vi. Setae 3a at least 2 times shorter than 2b ............................................................................................ R. (M.) arborimus Fain and Whitaker, 1975 ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 )
3. Setae e1 and f1 narrow lanceolate....................................................................... 10
- Setae e1 and f1 filiform................................................................................ 4
4. Setae 2a and 3a whip-like, subequal. Distances c1-d1 and d1-d2 subequal. Setae c2 distinctly narrower than ve ........... 5
- Setae 3a short, subequal 2b and much shorter than whip-like 2a. Distances c1-d1 1.5 times longer than d1-d2. Setae ve and c2 subequal in width......................................................... R. (M.) dinaromys sp. nov. ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 )
5. Setae ag2 at least 3 times longer than ag1 .................................................................. 7
- Setae ag1 and ag2 subequal or ag2 slightly longer than ag1 ................................................... 6
6. Subcapitular setae m with 3 or rarely 4 tines. Posterior end of vulvar region without punctations. Body lenght/width ratio 1.9:1..................................................... R. (M.) synaptomysi Bochkov and Mironov, 1998 ( Fig. 35 View FIGURE 35 )
- Subcapitular setae m with 5 tines. Posterior end of vulvar region scarcely punctated. Body long/width ratio 1.5:1.................................................................... R. (M.) arvicolae Fain and Lukoschus, 1977 ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 )
7. Body length/width 1.7–1.9:1. Setae c2 60–80 long, far from reaching level of seta e2 bases. Anterior margin of vulvar region widely rounded. Tarsus IV of female TN with 2–4 setae....................................................... 8
- Body length/width 1.4–1.6:1. Setae c2 longer 110, almost reaching level of seta e2 bases. Anterior margin of vulvar region almost straight. Tarsus IV of female TN without setae.......... R. (M.) arctica Fain and Lukoschus, 1977 ( Figs. 29 View FIGURE 29 , 31C View FIGURE 31 )
8. Subcapitular setae m with 3–4 tines. Vulvar region with ornamentation........................................... 9
- Subcapitular setae m with 2 tines. Vulvar region without ornamentation.................................................................................................... R. (M.) myopusi Bochkov and Mironov, 1998 ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 )
9. Subcapitular setae m with 3–4 tines. Vulvar region densely covered by punctation. Tarsus IV of female TN with 4 setae......................................... R. (M.) hylandi Fain and Lukoschus, 1977 ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 ) and R. (M.) pitymys sp. nov.
- Subcapitular setae m with 3 tines. Vulvar region covered by punctation only in posterior part. Tarsus IV of female TN with 3 setae....................................................... R. (M.) lemmus Fain and Lukoschus, 1977 ( Fig. 32 View FIGURE 32 )
10. Setae 1b and 1d slightly thickened, not more than 1.5 times thicker than 1a (in R. abramovi - scale like). Ventral projection on trochanter I present................................................................................... 12
- Setae 1b and 1d strongly thickened, more than 2 times thicker than 1a. Ventral projection on trochanter I absent......... 11
11. Subcapitular setae m with 2 tines. Setae ps3 moderately developed, 8–10 long and slightly curved. Ventral surface on trochanter I covered by tubercles in inner part............................ R. (M.) alticolae Bochkov, 1995 ( Figs. 14 View FIGURE 14 , 16 View FIGURE 16 )
- Subcapitular setae m lanceolate, pointed apically. Setae ps3 very short, about 6 long and almost straight. Ventral surface on trochanter I without tubercles................................... R. (M.) ladakensis Fain and Lukoschus, 1976 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 )
12. Setae 3a whip-like, subequal to 2a and much longer than 4a .................................................. 13
- Setae 3a relatively short, subequal to 4a and much shorter than 2a ........................................................................... R. (M.) eothenomys Fain and Lukoschus, 1976 ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 ) and R. (M.) golenishchevi sp. nov.
13. Setae 1b and 1d filiform. Setae vi, si, and se without antrorse projection in basal part. Vulvar region not strongly sclerotized in antero-median part................................................................................... 14
- Setae 1b and 1d scale-like. Setae vi, si, and se with antrorse projection in basal part. Vulvar region strongly sclerotized in antero-median part............................................ R. abramovi Bochkov and Mironov, 1998 ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 )
14. Subcapitular setae lanceolate, pointed apically. Setae vi distinctly wider than e2 ................................... 16
- Subcapitular setae with 3–5 or more rarely 2 tines. Setae vi slightly wider or subequal to e2 .......................... 15
15. Subcapitular setae m with 2–4 tines, usually with 3 tines. Setae f2 of female TN stick-like......................................... R. (M.) lemnina ( Koch, 1841) ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 3–8 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 ) and R. (M.) clethrionomys Fain and Lukoschus, 1977 ( Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 )
- Subcapitular setae m with 4–5 tines. Setae f2 of female TN narrowly lanceolate... R. (M.) rufocani Bochkov, 1995 ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 )
16. Vulvar region not punctuated. In female TN, setae e1, e2, and f1 very short, at least 3 times shorter than d2, setae 4a not thickened.............................................................................................. 17
- Vulvar region densely punctated. In female TN, setae e1, e2, and f1 distinctly or moderately developed, longer or only slightly shorter than d2, setae 4a distinctly thickened........................ R. (M.) cricetuliphila Bochkov, 1999 ( Figs. 58 View FIGURE 58 , 60 View FIGURE 60 )
17. Setae si about 3 times wider than se. Setae c2 slightly longer than c1, d1, and d2. Setae 3a and 4a of female TN whip-like, longer than 2a .............................................. R. (M.) triton Fain and Lukoschus, 1976 ( Figs. 47 View FIGURE 47 , 52B View FIGURE 52 )
- Setae si and se subequal in width. Setae c2 slightly shorter than c1, d1, and d2. Setae 3a and 4a of female TN shorter than 2a .................................................................. R. (M.) cricetulus Fain, 1973 ( Figs. 61 View FIGURE 61 , 63 View FIGURE 63 )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.