Sicyopus beremeensis, Keith & Amick & Toko & Lord, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.26028/cybium/2019-423-004 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87F3-8459-FFB7-FED4-FC5208C9A32B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sicyopus beremeensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sicyopus beremeensis n. sp.
( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 , Tab. I)
Comparative material
The new species is compared with Sicyopus multisqua-uamatus de Beaufort, 1912 , the only other species of Sicyopus having a first dorsal fin with six spines and a second dorsal fin with one spine and ten segmented rays (D VI-I,10), an anal fin with one spine and ten segmented rays (A I,10), and a pectoral fin with generally 17 rays. Sicyopus multisquama-uamatus was redescribed by Watson (1995).
Sicyopus multisquamatus . – ZMA 110.982 View Materials , holotype, female, 46.2 mm SL; small mountain creek near Honitetu , Ceram, Indonesia, 19 Feb. 1910, de Beaufort .
Material examined
Eleven specimens from New Britain ( Papua New Guinea), totalling 8 males and 3 females; size range 39-56.8 mm SL (48.6-68.7 mm, total length), largest male 56.8 mm SL, largest female 50.5 mm SL.
Holotype. – MNHN 2016-0628 About MNHN , male (55.6 mm SL), Wani Creek , New Britain ( Papua New Guinea), 03 Dec. 2015, Amick et al. coll.
Paratypes. – MNHN 2016-0629 About MNHN , 1 male, 1 female (45- 48.6 mm SL). Same data as holotype . MNHN 2018-0717 About MNHN , 1 male (47 mm SL), Elnge Creek , New Britain ( Papua New Guinea), 12 Nov. 2015, Amick et al. coll . MNHN 2018- 0718 About MNHN , 5 males, 2 females (39-57 mm SL), Kumkom Creek , New Britain ( Papua New Guinea), 13-17 Nov. 2015, Amick et al. coll .
Diagnosis
The new species has a first dorsal fin with six spines in both sexes, a second dorsal fin with one spine and ten segmented rays, an anal fin with one spine and ten segmented rays, 17 pectoral fin rays and preopercular pores M’, N and O’. Scales in lateral series 35-42, in predorsal series 0, and 12-15 in transverse back scale series.
Description
Scale counts, number of jaw teeth, morphometrics and fin lengths in Sicyopus beremeensis sp. nov. are given in table I. Below, the holotype counts are given first, followed, in brackets if different, by the paratypes’ counts.
First dorsal fin (D1) with six spines in both sexes, second dorsal fin (D2) with one spine and ten segmented rays
(D VI-I,10). Spines 5-6 longest and slightly filamentous in males, less in females. The base of first dorsal fin is not reaching the base of second dorsal fin origin in both sexes; distance between insertion of D1 and origin of D2 is about twice the eye diameter in female, less than the eye diameter in male. The anal fin has one flexible spine and mostly 10 segmented rays (A I,10) and is directly opposite to second dorsal fin. Pectoral fin rays 16(1)-17(10). Caudal fin with 14 branched rays with a posterior margin slightly rounded. Pelvic disc with 1 spine and 5 branched rays.
Scales in lateral series 38 (35-42); scales may extend midlaterally slightly anterior to the origin of first dorsal fin in male and female, and posteriorly to the hypural base.
Scales usually ctenoid from hypural base to origin of the first dorsal fin. A few cycloid scales along dorsum and anal fin base. In males, ctenoid scales on anterior body region ossi-
fied, each with 3-6 cteni; ctenoid scales on medium part of body with more cteni (6-10). In females, on anterior body region, scales mostly cycloid, as on the inferior part of the flanks. Ctenoid scales each with 3-6 cteni midlaterally. Scales in zigzag series 11 (11-13), transverse back series 13 (12-15), transverse forward series 11 (11-14). Predorsal midline naked. Head, breast, pectoral base and belly naked in most specimens. Lips smooth without cleft. The tongue is free from the floor of the mouth. Upper jaw teeth in one row, mostly conical in females with fewer canines and slightly more teeth (8-12) than in males 6 (6-9), mostly caniniform. Lower jaw teeth conical in females (range 5-6) and males 6 (4-6). Labial teeth (10-14) present along the edge of lower jaw mostly enclosed in a fleshy sheath. Jaw, dorsal, caudal and anal fins longer in males.
Cephalic sensory pore system A’, B, C, D, F, H’, K’, L’, M’, N and O’; D single, with all others paired, oculoscapular canal separated into anterior and posterior canals between pores H’ and K’. Cutaneous sensory papillae not well developed and very variable among specimens. Several with papillae between pores M’ and N and between pores F and D.
Urogenital papilla in male long and thin with pointed to rounded tip. Urogenital papilla in female rounded to rectangular.
Colour in preservative
Male. – Background cream to tan. Anterior part of head blackish dorsally and ventrally greyish. Body with usually three vertical black bands, including the head; second band below the first dorsal fin (this band is sometimes divided in two black parts slightly paler toward centre) and third band in front of the hypural crease. Lateral midline not well-
marked. Nape brownish. Caudal fin rays greyish. Dorsal and anal fins greyish to blackish, with a lighter basal part. Pelvic disk, pectoral rays and pectoral fin base greyish to blackish.
Female. – Mostly yellowish. Head and body greyish to whitish, snout dusky. Lateral midline with a diffuse greyish subcutaneous stripe. Inferior part of body whitish. Above midline body greyish. Dorsal rays and spines greyish. Caudal fin rays greyish as is the membrane and distal margin. Anal fin whitish to greyish. Pelvic disc not pigmented. Pectoral rays and membrane greyish to whitish.
Colour in life ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 )
The sexual dichromatism is well developed.
Male ( Fig. 1A View Figure 1 ). – Head black from the snout to the nape, both dorsally and ventrally; lips black. Centre of the eye black, while eye circumference is bright orange. Body with orange and black alternating wide bands (3 black bands including the head and three orange bands). Each band visible dorsally, on the flanks and ventrally, forming large alternating rings around the body. First orange band covers the operculum and stretches to the first third of the pectoral fin. Pelvic sucker orange. Then, black band, twice as wide as the first orange band, stretches along entire base of first dorsal fin to anterior base of anal fin. Second orange band along entire length of anal fin. Third black band stretched from posterior base of anal fin to caudal peduncle. Caudal peduncle and first third of the caudal fin orange, forming the last band. Caudal fin black, slightly translucent, with a bright blue border dorsally. Pectoral fins black. Anal fin bright orange with a black border. Posterior border of scales clearly pigmented, dark orange to black on the black bands and bright orange on the orange bands. Male colour can vary in brightness according to courtship ritual.
Female ( Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ). – Female colour less variable than in males. Overall body brownish to greyish. Head dark brown from snout to nape. Lips dark brown. Centre of eyes black, while circumference is light brown to orange. Body brownish dorsally and rather grey on the flanks. Belly whitish from pelvic sucker to anterior base of anal fin. Black longitudinal stripe stretching from under the eye to the posterior border of the caudal fin. Pectoral fins beige-yellow and translucent.
Caudal fin greyish translucent. Anal fin bright red.
Distribution
Currently known from freshwater streams in New Britain ( Papua New Guinea).
Ecology
Sicyopus beremeensis was collected in small, rapid and boulder-strewn mountain streams with rocky bottoms at altitudes ranging between 300 and 900 m asl. It is assumed to be amphidromous as the other members of the subfamily ( Keith, 2003).
Comparison
Sicyopus beremeensis (D VI-I,10 A I,10, and P 17) differs from: Sicyopus auxilimentus Watson & Kottelat, 1994
(D VI-I,9 A I,9 and P 14-15) from South Japan to Indonesia; Sicyopus lord Keith, Marquet & Taillebois, 2011 (D VI-I,9 A
I,9 and P 15) from Madagascar; Sicyopus rubicundus Keith,
Hadiaty, Busson & Hubert, 2014 (D VI-I,9 A I,9 and P 15) from Sunda Islands; Sicyopus zosterophorus (Bleeker, 1856)
(D VI-I,9 A I,9-10 and P 15-16) widespread in the Pacific; Sicyopus discordipinnis Watson, 1995 (D V-I,9 A I,9 and P
mostly 15) from Moluccas to Solomon; and Sicyopus jon-onklaasi Klausewitz & Henrich , 19861 (D V-I,9 A I,9-10 and P mostly 16) from Sri Lanka. See Keith et al. (2014, 2015).
Sicyopus beremeensis differs from S. multisquamatus in having fewer scales in lateral series (35-42 vs. 47), transverse back series (12-15 vs. 16) and predorsal series (0 vs. 4), smaller predorsal length (32-38 vs. 40 %SL) and caudal peduncle length (13-16 vs. 18) and fewer teeth in lower jaw (4-6 vs. 10).
1 Note concerning Sicyopus jonklaasi : in the description of Gobius jonklaasi , the text and pictures of Axelrod (1972) (pages F300.10 to 13) clearly refers to Sicyopterus lagocephalus , which would suggest Sicyopus jonklaasi is a different species and should be attributed to Klausewizt and Henrich, 1986 and not to Axelrod (1972). So, Sicyopus jonklaasi Klausewizt & Henrich, 1986 was not incorrectly treated as valid by several authors as stated by Fricke et al., 2018.
Etymology
The new species is named after Bereme village, to thank the local community for its warm welcome during our field- works.
Acknowledgements. – We wish to thank Joe Penny and Brendan Kilme of Ainbul Village in the Whiteman Range. The New Guinea Binatang Research Centre (BRC) provided logistical support throughout the 2015 survey, and fieldwork was financed by UNDP GEF-SGP. The present study and the 2018 trip were funded by the MNHN (UMR 7208 BOREA), the French Ichthyological Society (SFI) and the Fondation de France. Thanks to G. Kaipu ( PNG NRI) for the research permit, N. Gowep (CEPA) for the export permit and our friends B. Ruli (Live & Learn), J. Anamiato (National Museum and Art gallery of PNG) and D. Vaghelo (WNB Provin- cial Govt, Environment section) for their help during the 2018 field support. Finally, we thank for the loan of specimens: G. Moore, M. Allen, S. Morrison (WAM); F. Krupp, S. Dorow (SMF); R. de Ruiter (RMNH); R. Causse, Z. Gabsi (MNHN).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.