Archaeocypoda veronensis Secretan, 1975
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a9 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:69C34731-8C25-4A1E-B336-B222CD3CBAC3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8038637 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CDBE74-9383-B5A3-CDF2-FD55FE1BFA95 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Archaeocypoda veronensis Secretan, 1975 |
status |
|
Archaeocypoda veronensis Secretan, 1975 View in CoL
Archaeocypoda veronensis Secretan, 1975: 363 View in CoL , figs 21, 22, pl. 23, fig. 2, pls 24, 25.
REMARKS
The status of this species from the Early Eocene of Bolca Fossil-Lagerstätten, Italy (Secretan 1975: 363-369, figs 21, 22, pl. 23, fig. 2, pls 24, 25) (see De Angeli & Garassino 2006: 79), has been fully revised with numerous figures by Pasini et al. (2019b: 253, fig. 12). Casadío et al. (2005: 175) stated that it was not an ocypodid and suggested that it might be a member of the Dorippidae . Subsequently Schweitzer et al. (2010: 79) and Schweitzer et al. (2021: 1, fig. 1.2) included it in the Dorippidae , while Pasini et al. (2019b: 255) preferred to consider it as a ‘doubtful dorippid’. Figures of the holotype and paratypes (Giusberti et al. 2014: fig. 6d; Pasini et al. 2019b: fig. 12; Schweitzer et al. 2021: fig. 1.2) show crabs with an unreduced P4 and a poorly or not at all reduced P5, which excludes Archaeocypoda veronensis from being a dorippid. The hypothesis that at least part of this material could be an ethusid (only P5 reduced) is to be considered. See literature in Sasaki (2019: 7771).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Brachyura |
SuperFamily |
Dorippoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Dorippinae |
Genus |
Archaeocypoda veronensis Secretan, 1975
Guinot, Danièle 2023 |
Archaeocypoda veronensis
Secretan 1975: 363 |