Polycirrus macintoshi, Glasby & Hutchings, 2014

Glasby, Christopher J. & Hutchings, Pat, 2014, Revision of the taxonomy of Polycirrus Grube, 1850 (Annelida: Terebellida: Polycirridae), Zootaxa 3877 (1), pp. 1-117 : 68-69

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3877.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2695A2A6-2805-4FC6-B6B6-A8C68354B944

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CD87A2-FFD0-FF9B-FF66-A58EC31BA61E

treatment provided by

Felipe (2021-06-14 20:03:53, last updated 2024-11-26 00:38:01)

scientific name

Polycirrus macintoshi
status

 

Polycirrus macintoshi View in CoL nomen novum

Fig. 35a–d View FIGURE 35

Polycirrus kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885 View in CoL : xx, fig. 32a–d.

Polycirrus kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885: 475 View in CoL .— Monro, 1930: 194; 1936: 184.— Gravier, 1911: 141–143, pl. 11, fig. 138.— Augener, 1932: 67.— Hartman, 1966: 106–107. (secondary junior homonym—of Ereutho kergulenesis McIntosh, 1885).

Ereutho antarctica .— Willey, 1902: 281, Pl. XLII fig. 6, Pl. XLVI fig. 6. Not McIntosh, 1885.

Type locality. Kerguelen Island, Antarctic.

Material examined. HOLOTYPE: BMNH ZK 1885 :12:1:372. St.149 H, 48º45ʹ S, 69º14ʹ E, off Christmas Harbour , Kerguelen Island , 232 m (127 fm), coll. 29.i.1874, dredged volcanic mud. GoogleMaps NON-TYPES: AM W827 , Adelie Land Commonwealth Bay, Boat Harbour, 67° S, 142°36ʹ E. GoogleMaps

Description. Based on type material plus material of AM W827 collected by the Australian Antarctic Expedition which closely resembles the type fragment. Alcohol preserved animal, pale yellow in colour, 4 mm long, 1 mm wide excluding buccal tentacles, posteriorly incomplete. Sex unknown.

Holotype poorly preserved with body wall damaged and large amounts of the body wall removed, chaetae mainly damaged, thus making the determination of number of segments impossible.

Dorsum anteriorly smooth. Venter anteriorly with mid-ventral groove and discrete ventro-lateral pads; pads more-or-less smooth, extending from segment 2 to 13. Mid-ventral groove from segment 4 ( Fig. 35a View FIGURE 35 ).

Buccal tentacles missing, arising dorsally on prostomial ridge, which extends laterally. Prostomial ridge slightly curved, extending laterally along anterodorsal base of upper lip. Upper lip comprising single (medial) lobe only, margin of lobe convoluted; oral surface glandular, ciliated, with grooves leading to mouth. Inner lower lip oblong, partially hidden by upper lip, smooth; outer region flat, shield-like, oblong, wider than long, smooth, divided in two by transverse groove, extending posteriorly to segment 3. Achaetous segments visible dorsally but obscured by expanded outer lower lip ventrally ( Fig. 35a View FIGURE 35 ).

Notochaetigerous segments 11, extending to segment 13 (determined from non-type specimens). Notopodia and notochaetae damaged. Notochaetae within a chaetiger one type, gradually elongating from dorsal to ventral, hirsute, uniformly tapered ( Fig. 35b View FIGURE 35 ). Neurochaetae beginning on segment 14. Neuropodial tori ridge-like. Uncini with short neck and elongated straight to convex base (Type 1), teeth above main fang arranged in double transverse series, subrostral process present as low, rounded protuberance ( Fig. 35c, d View FIGURE 35 ).

Nephridial papillae not visible.

Comments. McIntosh (1885) described two different species named kergulensis in two different genera ( Polycirrus and Ereutho ). As the two names are now considered to represent the same genus, Ereutho kerguelensis becomes a member of Polycirrus . Unfortunately this renders P. kerguelensis McIntosh, 1885 as a junior homonym on the basis of page priority. We therefore propose a new name, Polycirrus macintoshi n. nom., for P. kerguelensis .

Earlier, Hartman (1966) synonymised E. kerguelensis with P. kerguelensis with no comment. She also gave a composite description of a species with 11–15 pairs of notopodia and neurochaetae from the first to the third last notopodium, which is an unusual configuration. We suggest that at least two species have been confused and all references listed by her on page 106 require a re-examination of material. However, we can confirm that material identified by Gravier (1911) as P. kerguelensis , as listed in the synonymy of Hartman (1966), is correct.

Augener, H. (1932) Antarktische und antiboreale Polychaeten nebst einer Hirudinee. Scientific results of the Norwegian Antarctic Expeditions 1927 - 1928 et sqq., instituted and financed by Consul Lars Christensen. No. 9. Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi I Oslo, 1932, 1 - 86.

Gravier, C. (1911) Expedition Antarctique Francaise du Porquoi-Pas , dirigee par le Dr J. - B. Charcot (1908 - 1910). Especes nouvelles d'annelides polychetes. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 17, 310 - 316.

Hartman, O. (1966) Polychaeta Myzostomidae and Sedentaria of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series, 7, 1 - 158. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1029 / AR 007

McIntosh, W. C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H. M. S. ' Challenger' during the years 1873 - 76. Report of the Scientific Results of the Exploring Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, 12, 1 - 554. [1873 - 76]

Monro. C. C. A. (1936) Polychaete worms. II. Discovery Reports, 12, 59 - 198, figs. 1 - 33.

Monro, C. C. A. (1930) Polychaete worms. Discovery Reports, 2, 1 - 222.

Willey, A. (1902) Polychaeta. Report on the collections of natural history made in the Antarctic regions during the voyage of the Southern Cross, XII, 262 - 283, pls. 41 - 46.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 35. Polycirrus macintoshi n.nom. a.Anterior ventral view, holotype BMNH 1885.12.1.372. b. Notochaeta illustrated at x40, anterior chaetiger AM W826. c. Lateral view of uncinus from anterior parapodia BMNH 1885.12.1.372. d. Lateral views of two uncini from posterior parapodia AM W826, AM W827.

AM

Australian Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Terebellida

Family

Terebellidae

Genus

Polycirrus