Phyxioschema gedrosia, Schwendinger & Zamani, 2018

Schwendinger, Peter J. & Zamani, Alireza, 2018, A new species of Phyxioschema (Araneae: Dipluridae) from Iran, Revue suisse de Zoologie 125 (2), pp. 283-289 : 284-288

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.1414225
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5592725
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC87EC-865B-9A7C-463D-CF4DFEE5F93A
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Phyxioschema gedrosia
status	sp. nov.

Treatment

Phyxioschema gedrosia sp. nov.

Figs 1-4 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig

Material: Male holotype; Iran, Sistan & Baluchistan Province , Bashagard Mts, Haboudan Village, 26°37’2.8”N, 60°23’38”E; 17.XI.2017; leg. A. Zamani. GoogleMaps

Etymology: The specific epithet, a name in apposition, is the ancient Greek name of modern Baluchistan (= Baluchestan).

Diagnosis: Medium-sized species with fairly stout legs ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). Different from all other Phyxioschema species by one apical megaspine on ventral spur of tibia II situated behind the other ( Fig. 3 View Fig G-H, I-J), not beside it. Distinguished from the Central Asian P. raddei and P. roxana by angle between tibia II and its ventral spur being much narrower and acute rather than rounded ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig I-J cf. Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011: figs 2D-E and 6E-F); proventral keel on metatarsus II prominent and subquadrangular ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig L-O) instead of low and rounded (as in P. raddei ; Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011: figs 2D, 3L-P) or prominent and subtriangular (as in P. roxana ; Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011: figs 6E, 7K-N).

Description: Male: Colour in alcohol: Carapace ( Figs 1 View Fig , 2A View Fig ) uniformly light brown; eye mound black. Palpal coxae light brown, prolateral zone only indistinctly lighter than rest of ventral side ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Labium with cream-coloured anterior half and light reddish brown posterior half ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Sternum mostly light brown; margin, fused anterior pair of sigilla (forming postlabial depression) and separated three pairs of sigilla light reddish brown ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Legs (including ventral side of coxae) mostly light brown, their ventral side slightly lighter than dorsal side; entire dorsal side of tibia I, patches at bases of spines on ventral side of tibia I ( Fig. 2F View Fig ), entire metatarsus I and most of tarsus I (except for pseudosegmentation) distinctly darker; small retrodorsal-distal patch, large prodorsal-prolateraldistal patch (extending back to band of hooked spinules) and entire ventral spur of tibia II, and proximal third of metatarsus II dark reddish brown ( Fig. 2G View Fig ); no light longitudinal dorsal stripes on patellae discernible, indistinct ones present on tibiae and metatarsi I. All membranes uniformly cream-coloured. Opisthosoma mostly light greyish brown, without pattern ( Figs 1 View Fig , 2C View Fig ); ventral side of posterior lateral spinnerets greyish brown, mottled with light spots.

Body 11.7 long. Carapace ( Fig. 2A View Fig ) 4.5 long, 3.9 wide, oval, almost flat, quite densely covered with fine, relatively long, adpressed grey hairs (most straight, few slightly curved or wavy); few stronger bristles on and in front of eye mound, two bristles in front of pitlike fovea and several bristles on posterolateral corners of carapace. Eyes ( Fig. 3A View Fig ) on low mound; eye group 0.41 long, anterior eye row distinctly procurved, 0.71 wide, posterior eye row straight, 0.78 wide. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.24, PME 0.16, PLE 0.21; AME-AME 0.09, AME-ALE 0.06, PME-PME 0.28, PME-PLE 0.04. MOQ 0.28 long, 0.33 wide anteriorly, 0.55 posteriorly.

Chelicerae weak, grooves with 9/11 prolateral teeth and about 30 tiny medioproximal denticles. Palpal coxae ( Fig. 2B View Fig ) 1.1 long, 0.7 wide; prolateral-distal lobe indistinct, with indistinct serrula on ridge. Labium ( Fig. 2B View Fig ) 0.3 long, 0.7 wide, anterior edge distinctly setose, followed by pallid zone without setae; posterior part pigmented, with few setae. Sternum ( Fig. 2B View Fig ) 2.3 long, 1.9 wide, cordate, with distinctly sunken postlabial sigilla (medially fused with each other and with labiosternal suture) and three pairs of indistinct marginal sigilla.

Palps ( Fig. 3 View Fig B-C). Measurements: total length 4.4 (1.8 + 0.7 + 1.2 + 0.7). Spination: tibia r1 (very long); tarsus p1, r1 (much shorter). 8+8 trichobothria in two rows on tibiae, 10 trichobothria in an irregular row on tarsi. Palpal organ with a narrow kidney-shaped subtegulum, a much wider, asymmetrically pyriform tegulum and a quite long (about as long as tegulum), almost straight embolus tapering to a very slightly curved tip.

Legs 2134. Leg I 11.5 long (3.4 + 2.0 + 2.4 + 2.3 + 1.4); leg II 11.3 long (3.3 + 1.8 + 2.4 + 2.2 + 1.6); leg III 12.1 long (3.4 + 1.7 + 2.2 + 3.1 + 1.7); leg IV 15.2 long (3.8 + 2.1 + 3.1 + 4.2 + 2.0). Tibia I 1.06 wide, tibia II 1.30, tibiae III and IV 0.71 each. All tarsi pseudosegmented and densely armed with spines. Metatarsal preening combs absent. Leg I: metatarsus with one proximoventral spine stronger than nearby ones (similar to distoventral spines; on left side more pronounced than on right side; Fig. 3F View Fig ); tibia distinctly incrassate (150% of tibiae III or IV width), ventrally flattened in some areas (mostly in distal half), carrying ventral megaspines with bases surrounded by darker pigment ( Figs 2F View Fig , 3E View Fig ); patella with a curved row of 4/5 spines retroventrally (the distal ones longer and curved, the proximal ones shorter and slightly sigmoid), without triangular projection on retrolateral margin ( Fig. 3D View Fig ); distal part of femur with relatively short and wide band of hooked spinules retrodorsally ( Fig. 2D View Fig ). Leg II: proximal part of metatarsus with two widely separated keels ( Fig. 3 View Fig K-L): the proventral one large, almost quadrangular in prolateral view and with a sharp, very prominent ventral edge ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig L-O), the retroventral keel indistinct, much less elevated and with an angular but not elevated ventral edge ( Fig. 3 View Fig L-M); tibia strongly incrassate (180% of tibiae III and IV width; Figs 2G View Fig , 3G View Fig ), band of elongate spinules on prolateral side straight, slightly inclined from longitudinal axis of tibia, reaching beyond height of distal side of ventral spur ( Fig. 2G View Fig ); ventral spur of tibia apically tapering in ventral view ( Fig. 3G View Fig ) and only indistinctly widened in lateral view ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig I-J), its apex not bilobed and carrying two megaspines, one situated behind the other (not side by side as in all other Phyxioschema spp. ); dorsal megaspine shorter and more inclined from axis of tibial spur than ventral one ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig G-J); band of hooked spinules prolaterally on femur II ( Fig. 2E View Fig ) much longer and slightly narrower than corresponding band on femur I ( Fig. 2D View Fig ).

Spination: I: patella p1, v4/5; tibia p1/2, v20; metatarsus v13/17; tarsus v13. II: patella p2; tibia p2, v2 megaspines; metatarsus p2, v7; tarsus v17. III: patella p2/3, r1; tibia d2, p2, r2, v5; metatarsus d5, p3, r1, v10/11; tarsus v12. IV: patella p2, r1; tibia d2, p2, r2, v6; metatarsus d3/4, p2, r1, v9/10; tarsus v9.

Trichobothria: 9-10+ 9-10 in two rows on tibiae; 10-12 in a straight row on metatarsi; about 9-10 in a straight row on tarsi. Paired claws with 10-12 teeth in sigmoid row; unpaired claw with 6-7 quite long, sessile teeth.

Opisthosoma 6.3 long, 4.4 wide; covered with fine adpressed hairs (mostly in posterior part) interspersed with fewer fine dark hairs and long dark bristles with orangebrown sockets ( Fig. 2C View Fig ). Posterior median spinnerets 0.6 long; posterior lateral spinnerets 5.9 long (proximal article 1.7, median article 1.7, pseudosegmented distal article 2.5).

Female: Unknown.

Relationships and taxonomic status: Due to the stouter and more spiny legs with incrassate tibiae I and II and a ventrally partly flattened tibia I, P. gedrosia sp. nov. clearly belongs to the Central Asian species group which also includes P. raddei and P. roxana . Judging from the distally narrow ventral spur on tibia II and from the strongly projecting and sharp proventral keel on metatarsus II, P. gedrosia sp. nov. appears most closely related to P. roxana . The characteristic and strongly autapomorphic ventral coupling spur of tibia II with its apical megaspines situated one behind the other ( Figs 2G View Fig , 3 View Fig G-J) is not completely unparalleled. In P. raddei the retrolateral-apical lobe of the coupling spur is slightly bent dorsad, and consequently the retrolateral megaspine is situated slightly more dorsally than the prolateral one (see Schwendinger & Zonstein, 2011: figs 2C-E, 3G), though not behind it as in P. gedrosia sp. nov. This may be an indication for a close relationship between P. raddei and P. gedrosia sp. nov., as is the presence of an enlarged ventral spine in the proximal part of metatarsus I. However, other taxonomic characters (narrow apex of ventral spur of tibia II; presence of only two keels on metatarsus II, the proventral one large and very prominent) rather supports a closer relationship between P. roxana and P. gedrosia sp. nov. The female of the new species is unknown and characters of the vulva thus cannot be evaluated for phylogenetic relationship, but in view of the very close resemblance of the vulvae in P. raddei and P. roxana we do not expect to find much useful information to this respect once the missing female is discovered.

Due to the still unresolved taxonomic status of Afghanothele lindbergi Roewer, 1960 and A. striatipes Roewer, 1960 and due to the continuous inaccessibility of their type localities in Afghanistan, it is possible that P. gedrosia sp. nov. as well as P. roxana will be synonymised with one of these two nominal species in the future. A further new Phyxioschema locality recently discovered by the second author in southwestern Iran (so far only females available) may belong to any of the currently known species, but we would not be surprised if it represents yet another undescribed species. The Phyxioschema diversity in Central Asia is possibly much underestimated, as it was in Thailand ( Raven & Schwendinger, 1989; Schwendinger, 2009). More spider sampling in Central Asia is desirable but unfortunately this has long been (and still is) difficult due to political and sectarian conflicts.

Distribution, habitat and phenology: The holotype of P. gedrosia sp. nov. was collected from its web using meal worms as bait. The type locality in southeastern Iran ( Fig. 4 View Fig , locality 6) lies in the driest region of Central Asia. The habitat is a deserted mountainous area, with the main vegetation consisting of the palm Nannorrhops ritchiana .

The male holotype was collected immature in November 2017 and moulted to maturity in February 2018. This is earlier than in P. roxana (May to June) and in P. raddei (May to July).