Fredyagrion andromache (Hagen in Selys, 1876)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5105.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B30E589-CEFC-415B-9505-EAE71C204E61 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6335795 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC8790-277A-AA20-6CB1-FCDD6B35F911 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Fredyagrion andromache (Hagen in Selys, 1876) |
status |
|
Fredyagrion andromache (Hagen in Selys, 1876) View in CoL comb. nov.
Fig. 17 View FIGURE 17 (app), Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 (prothorax), Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 (habitus).
Etymology: andromache = Greek (Ἀνδρομάχη) classical mythology, the wife of Hector and mother of Astyanax.
Hagen in Selys 1876: 978 (description of male and female); Kirby 1890: 155 (data on publication and distribution); Williamson 1917: Plate XVII, 3–4 (illustration of appendages in lateral and dorsal views); Kennedy 1919: 182 (illustration of appendages in lateral and dorsal views); Santos 1962: 5, Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 , 11 View FIGURE 11 (data on distribution, female prothorax in dorsal view, female pterostigma hind wing); Santos 1965a: 30 (compared with L. aculeatum ); Santos 1965b: 43 (compared with L. capixabae ); Santos 1966: 83 (data on larvae); Santos 1968a: 64 (compared with L. dardanoi ); Santos 1978: 5 (compared with L. vriesianum ); Davies & Tobin 1984: 82 (data on publication and distribution); Bridges 1994: (VII) 12 (data on publication, types depository, type locality and references); Costa & Garrison 2001: 382, Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 , 26 View FIGURE 26 , 38a View FIGURE 38 , 47b View FIGURE 47 (distribution, key to Brazilian Leptagrion , illustration of appendages in lateral, mediodorsal and dorsal, male forewing pterostigma, female prothorax in dorsal view, female hindwing pterostigma); Lencioni 2006: 141, Figs. 82C–E (illustration of male forewing pterostigma, female hind wing pterostigma, female prothorax in dorsal view. Appendages in lateral and dorsal views of a specimen incorrectly identified by the author as L. andromache , but corresponding to L. jeromei Lencioni, Vilela & Furieri, 2021 ); Machado 2007: 126 (occurrence in Minas Gerais as “ L. andromadra ”); Muzón et al. 2009: 65, Figs. 1–10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 (description of larvae and first occurrence of the genus in Argentina, larval illustrations); Costa et al. 2009: 94 (larval description and illustrations); Garrison et al. 2010: 264 (data on species); Lencioni 2017a: 369, Figs. 213A–E, 214A (data on description, type locality, type deposition, distribution, and larval description, illustration belongs to a new species incorrectly identified by the author as L. andromache , but corresponding to L. jeromei Lencioni, Vilela & Furieri, 2021 ).
Deposition of type series. Syntypes in IRSNB (examined through photos) .
Larva described. Yes ( Muzón et al. 2009).
Material examined. 2♂♂ ( UFAP), Brazil: Amapá, Laranjal do Jari, Comunidade de Água Branca do Cajari , (0.5693 S, 52.1759 W), 20.viii.2019, M.D.N. Garcia Júnior leg. GoogleMaps
Distribution. Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Bahia), Argentina (Misiones).
IRSNB |
Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |