Parnara kotoshona Sonan, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189654 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6225212 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC500D-F301-342E-FF2C-F33B3B9DB97A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Parnara kotoshona Sonan, 1936 |
status |
|
Parnara kotoshona Sonan, 1936 View in CoL
Zephyrus 6:214.
Labels: “ Parnara / kotoshona Sonan / DET. J. SONAN,” “ Kashoto/ 2 X 1923 / J. Sonan,” “ No. 61,” “ Type [in red].”
A male specimen was designated as the holotype by Sonan (1936), and the holotype was retrieved from TARI ( Fig. 22–24 View FIGURES 19 – 39 ). Evans (1949) synonymized this taxon with Parnara guttata (Bremer & Grey, 1853) . His treatment has been followed by all subsequent authors (e. g. Shirôzu 1960; Bridges 1983; Chiba & Eliot 1991; Chiba et al. 1992; Tsukiyama et al. 1997). The name kotoshona Sonan, 1936 is regarded as a junior subjective synonym of Parnara guttata (Bremer & Grey, 1853) in the present study.
An inconsistency in locality was found between the identification label and data label of the holotype. The collecting locality is given as “Kotosho” (= Lanyu) on the identification label whereas it is “Kashoto” (= Ludao) on the data label. Sonan (1936) gave “Kotosho” as the type locality in the original description of kotoshona . These two islands are separated by approximately 73 km, and P. guttata is more commonly found on Ludao than on Lanyu ( Yamanaka 1980). Sonan may have misread his own hand-writing on the data label when he decided to describe his specimens as a new species over 10 years after he collected the specimens. Consequently the true type locality of kotoshona perhaps should be Kashoto (Ludao), not Kotosho (Lanyu).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |