Augiades bouddha niitakana Sonan, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189654 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6225208 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC500D-F301-342D-FF2C-F6903B1EBE30 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Augiades bouddha niitakana Sonan, 1936 |
status |
|
Augiades bouddha niitakana Sonan, 1936
Zephyrus 6:213.
Labels: “ Augiades / bouddha / niitakana Sonan/ DET. J. SONAN,” “ 800- SUIGEN/ 24 VII 1930 / Col. J. Sonan,” “ No. 60,” “ Type [in red].”
A male specimen was designated as the holotype by Sonan (1936), and this holotype was retrieved in TARI ( Fig. 16–18 View FIGURES 1 – 18 ). Evans (1949) treated this taxon as a subspecies of Ochlodes siva Moore, 1878 , and this treatment was followed by Bridges (1983). Shirôzu (1960), however, considered this taxon a synonym of Augiades sylvanus var. formosana Matsumura, 1919 , which was recognized to represent a valid subspecies of Ochlodes subhyalina (Bremer & Grey, 1853) by Evans (1949). Based on the characteristics of male genitalia, Chiba and Tsukiyama (1996) subsequently raised formosana to species status, and considered it a species endemic to Taiwan. Hsu et al. (2006), however, found that formosana Matsumura, 1919 is actually a junior subjective synonym of Ochlodes venata (Bremer & Grey, 1853) , so niitakana Sonan, 1936 should be resurrected in the combination Ochlodes niitakanus . Shirôzu (1960) claimed that the allotype female of niitakana was probably a different species. His statement seems to be groundless. We examined the female paratype of niitakana ( Fig. 19–21 View FIGURES 19 – 39 ) and confirmed that it was conspecific with the male holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |