Hylemya Robineau-Desvoidy , 1830: 550
|
publication ID |
11755334 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB8789-FFEA-FFAE-FF1C-FA7D9C9AE35F |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Hylemya Robineau-Desvoidy , 1830: 550 |
| status |
|
254. Hylemya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830: 550 View in CoL View at ENA .
ORIGINALLY INCLUDED SPECIES: Hylemya strenua Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya plebeia Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830 (as “ Musca plebeia . Fabric. Anthomyia Meig. ”); Hylemya silvicola Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya luteipes Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya hyemalis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya tibialis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya vivida Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya nigripes Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya rustica Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya liturata Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya flavipennis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya florea Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830; Hylemya autumnalis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya flavoptera Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830; Hylemya arvensis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 ; Hylemya agrestis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 .
TYPE SPECIES: Hylemya strenua Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 [= Musca vagans Panzer, 1798 ], by subsequent designation ( Rondani, 1866: 74).
CURRENT STATUS: Valid genus [teste Sabrosky (1999: 163)].
FAMILY: ANTHOMYIIDAE .
REMARKS: Rondani (1856: 96) designated Musca strigosa “Fall. ” but this was not a valid designation because it was not an originally included species. Rondani (1866: 74) was the first valid designation by including Hylemya strenua Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 as a synonym of Musca strigosa Fabricius, 1794 . Dely- Draskovits (1993: 63) mistakenly gave the type species as Musca vagans Panzer, 1798 as designated by Rondani (1866: 74). Musca vagans Panzer, 1798 is the oldest taxonomically valid species because Musca strigosa Fabricius, 1794 is preoccupied by Musca strigosa Gmelin, 1790 , but it was not the nominal species name designated by Rondani (1866: 74). Although Robineau-Desvoidy (1830: 551) described a “ Hylemya plebeia . Fabr.” and cited under it “ Musca plebeia . Fabric. Anthomyia Meig. ”, there is no nominal species that either Fabricius or Meigen described that could be considered the same as Robineau-Desvoidy’s species. Coquillett (1910: 554) stated that Hylemya plebeia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 was a new species and we treat it as such here.
EMENDATIONS: Hylemyia Macquart, 1835: 315 (unjustified); Hylemia Marié, 1930: 227 (unjustified), n. syn.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.