Huasteca, Cruz-López & Francke, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12299 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA87F9-A27E-FF80-FC4A-FB73C1B3FC85 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Huasteca |
status |
gen. nov. |
HUASTECA View in CoL GEN. NOV.
Karos: Goodnight & Goodnight 1971: 34 View in CoL , 36, figs 6, 7, 10–13 (in part); Šilhavý, 1974: 185, figs 22–26, 30–33 (in part).
Distribution: Caves in the Sierra Madre Oriental, eastern Mexico, from central Tamaulipas through to San Luís Potosí, Veracruz, and Hidalgo, and extending south to northern Oaxaca.
Type species: Huasteca gratiosa ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1971) comb. nov.
Included species: Huasteca gratiosa ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1971) comb. nov., Huasteca rugosa ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1971) comb. nov., and Huasteca silhavyi sp. nov.
Etymology: Noun in apposition in reference to a cultural area of central Mexico and an ancient Mayan ethnic group who inhabited the states of Hidalgo, Queretaro, San Luís Potosí, Tamaulipas, and Veracruz. The term comes from the nahuatl word huaxi, which means guaje in Spanish ( Crescentia spp. ), and the combination ‘huax-tecos(as)’ refers to the people that inhabit that region, which is where the genus is distributed. Feminine in gender.
Diagnosis: Troglobitic and troglomorphic stygnopsids. Scutum quadrangular, with lateral clear areas remarkably protruding, rounded ( Figs 46B View Figure 46 , 49B View Figure 49 , 52B View Figure 52 , 61D View Figure 61 ). Lateral channel area of scutum very high, almost opisthosoma height ( Figs 45B View Figure 45 , 48B View Figure 48 , 51B View Figure 51 , 63B View Figure 63 ). Ocularium inconspicuous, almost absent ( Figs 46D View Figure 46 , 49D View Figure 49 , 52D View Figure 52 ), in the middle of prosoma ( Fig. 45B View Figure 45 ). Dorsal ornamentation ranges from almost absent to completely covered with small, rounded tubercles. Apical portion of femur II in males slightly swollen ( Figs 46C View Figure 46 , 49C View Figure 49 , 52C View Figure 52 , 60C View Figure 60 ). Stigmatic area short, but slightly longer in males than females ( Figs 45C View Figure 45 , 48C View Figure 48 , 51C View Figure 51 ). Male genitalia: pars distalis slightly swollen in the middle, sometimes irregular and asymmetrical. Ventral plate slender and short, apical margin convex. Four pairs of lateral setae, length almost equal to width of pars distalis. Three pairs of ventral microsetae, basal pair separat- ed from the rest. Two pairs of parastylar setae, laterobasal to follis, length of follis similar to width ( Figs 47 View Figure 47 , 50 View Figure 50 , 53 View Figure 53 ).
Comparisons: The unusual scutum shape, plus the projections of lateral clear areas, confer to this genus a peculiar appearance. In addition, the sexually dimorphic characters on the legs in males, plus the male genitalia, make this genus easy to recognize within the Karos genus-group and the entire family.
HUASTECA GRATIOSA ( GOODNIGHT & GOODNIGHT, 1971) COMB. NOV.
( FIGS 45–47 View Figure 45 View Figure 46 View Figure 47 , 59 View Figure 59 , 60C View Figure 60 )
Karos gratiosus Goodnight & Goodnight 1971: 34 View in CoL (description of male and female); Karos graciosus [sic] Rambla & Juberthie 1994: 218; Kury & Cokendolpher 2000: 155; Kury, 2003: 238.
Type locality: MEXICO: San Luís Potosí: Municipio Xilitla, Cueva de Poca Ventana (21°23′14.38″N, 98°59′1.32″W) GoogleMaps .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Huasteca
Cruz-López, Jesús A. & Francke, Oscar F. 2015 |
Karos: Goodnight & Goodnight 1971: 34
Silhavy V 1974: 185 |
Goodnight CJ & Goodnight ML 1971: 34 |
Karos gratiosus
Kury AB 2003: 238 |
Kury AB & Cokendolpher JC 2000: 155 |
Rambla M & Juberthie C 1994: 218 |
Goodnight CJ & Goodnight ML 1971: 34 |