Calolamprodes characterosa ( Walker, 1868 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3847.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:19E58554-5B31-496B-B851-A26DEE4B7929 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6134136 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CA2572-FFCC-FF99-8580-13CFC19FB2FB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Calolamprodes characterosa ( Walker, 1868 ) |
status |
|
Calolamprodes characterosa ( Walker, 1868) View in CoL
( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 A–V, 11 View FIGURE 11 C–F)
Material. SOUTH INDIA, state Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore , September 1959, coll. P.S. Nathan— 1 male ( MMUM) ; same data, but October 1959— 1 male ( ZIN) ; same data, but March 1959—1 larva ( MMUM) ; same data, but Nilgiri Hills , Devala, 3200 ft., October 1961— 1 female ( MMUM) . SRI LANKA, Nord-West Prov. , Marawilla, h~ 10 m, 7°26'11'' N, 79°40'02'' E, 25 December 2012–1 January 2013, coll. I. Melnik— 1 male ( ZIN) GoogleMaps .
The description by L.M. Roth (1981) can be supplemented with the following details.
Description. Male. General color yellowish brown, as in Fig. 11C–F View FIGURE 11. A, F . Surfaces smooth and lustrous; punctuation absent. Head wide and rounded ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 A, 11D, F); ocellar spots large; distance between eyes about 1.2 times of the eye length; distance between antennal sockets about 2.5–2.6 times of the scape length (0.5 mm) (about 2.2 in specimen from Sri Lanka, scape length— 0.6 mm); approximate length ratio of 3rd–5th segments of maxillary palps 1.2–1.3: 1: 1.3–1.4. Pronotum as in Figs.10 View FIGURE 10 B, 11C, E. Tegmina and wings completely developed, surpassing abdominal apex, rounded apically ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11. A, F ). Anterior margin of fore femur armed according to the type B, with 5 spines, including 1 apical one ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 C). Fore tibiae distinctly thickened distally ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 C). Structure of hind tarsi ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D): metatarsus a little longer than other segments combined, with 2 unequal rows of spines along lower margin [exterior row ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D, e.r.) consists of 27–28, interior one ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D, i.r.)—13 spines (35 and 17 spines respectively in the specimen from Sri Lanka)]; 2nd and 3rd segments with 6–8/5 and 5–6/2 spines in exterior and interior rows respectively (9/5 and 6/2 spines—in specimen from Sri Lanka); other segments without spines along lower margin; metatarsus and 2nd–3rd segments with small apical euplantulae, 4th segment with larger euplantula ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D); 2nd–3rd segments with euplantulae bordered with 2–4 "additional spines" ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D, a.s.); claws symmetrical, simple; arolium well developed. Fore and middle tarsi similar to hind ones, but comparatively shorter. Anal plate as in Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 E, F, with medial incision more or less expressed; paraprocts ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 G) and hypandrium ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 H) usual for the genus ( Roth 1981; Anisyutkin 2006).
Male genitalia ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 J–V). Right phallomere (R+N) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 J, K) with sclerite R1T thin and weakly sclerotized, caudal part of sclerite R1T reduced, only part situated in front of sclerite R2 present, densely covered with bristles; R2 straight; R3 long, with cranial part rod-like and caudal part curved; R4 substituted with membranous lobe; R5 large and strongly sclerotized, situated apart of other sclerites of right phallomere. Sclerite L2D (L1) divided into basal and apical parts ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 O, L); basal part strongly widened cranially, with "bent outgrowth" at caudal end ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 L, M, O, P, b.o.), sometimes with small rounded "additional sclerite" under basal part of L2D ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 L, a.scl.); apical part in shape of flattened, plate-like sclerite, with cranially prolonged "ventral projection" ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 M, N, P, v.pr.), and "apical tooth" in specimen from Sri Lanka ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 L–N, ap.t.); bristles absent. Sclerite L3 (L2d) without basal subsclerite; "folded structure" distinct, bristles absent ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 Q–S, f.s.); apex of L3 with comparatively larger "small tooth" ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 Q–V, s.t.) and more or less expressed "apical crest" ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 Q–V, ap.cr.), groove hge absent. Sclerite L4U (L3d) weakly sclerotized, elongated.
Variations. Two specimens from South India are very similar in their external morphology, but the specimen from Sri Lanka differs in the darker coloration (cf. Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11. A, F and Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11. A, F ), the larger size, the more numerous tarsal spines and the following details of the male genitalia: the shape of right phallomere (compare Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 J and Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 K) and the apical part of sclerite L3 (compare Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 Q–S and Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 T–V), and in the apical part of sclerite L2D (compare Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 O, P and Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 L–N).
Female. Typical for the genus ( Bey-Bienko 1969; Anisyutkin 1999, 2006), with the tegmina being reduced to the lateral flaps ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 I).
Measurements (mm). Head length: male 2.5–2.7, female 3.1; head width: male 2.6–2.9, female 3.5; pronotum length: male 4.0–4.5, female 4.4; pronotum width: male 5.4–6.0, female 6.8; tegmen length: male 14.0–15.2, female 3.0; tegmen width (in males—in place where CuP running into posterior margin of tegmen; in female—maximal width): male 4.6–5.0, female 1.8. Larger measurements attributed to specimen from Sri Lanka.
Note. C. characterosa was described in the genus Epilampra ( Walker 1868, p. 209) from Bengal. Later, K. Princis described C. tranquebarica ( Princis, 1951) , also in the genus Epilampra , from South India ( Princis 1951). L. Roth (1981) treated C. tranquebarica as a junior synonym of C. characterosa referring to the latter species as occurring both in India and in Sri Lanka. Species of the genus Calolamprodes can be distinguished by fine details in the somatic morphology and the male genitalia ( Anisyutkin 2006). Unfortunately, the available descriptions of C. characterosa and C. tranquebarica are not detailed enough. Therefore, it is possible that both species and the specimen from Sri Lanka described above are not conspecific. Further studies based on a more representative material are required to resolve this problem.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |