Sinoennea latens Peile, 1935
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:83A57E5F-10AB-46EF-A35C-29B2E747851A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5449379 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987F7-FFAD-4E05-FEB2-F903FB843FAE |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Sinoennea latens Peile, 1935 |
status |
|
Sinoennea latens Peile, 1935 View in CoL
( Fig. 16A View Fig )
Sinoennea latens Peile, 1935: 383 View in CoL , fig. 2.
Sinoennea latens View in CoL — Richardson, 1988: 159.
Type locality. “ Khasi and Naga Hills ” .
Material examined. Holotype + one S. stenopylis specimen for comparison ( NHMUK 1935.7.10.3–4), Khasi or Naga Hills.
Remarks. The differences compared with S. stenopylis are very minor. Both species belong to Sinoennea .
The description was based on a single specimen. The cardboard box containing the holotype of S. latens also contained a shell of S. stenopylis for comparison. This was clearly indicated by handwriting on the base of the cardboard box (“ Sinoennea latens Peile , Type/+ stenopylis Bs. For comparison/Khasi or Naga Hills/Pr. Malac. Soc. 1935/H.C. Fulton Esq./1935.7.10.3–4”).
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sinoennea latens Peile, 1935
Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu 2020 |
Sinoennea latens
Richardson CL 1988: 159 |
Sinoennea latens
Peile AJ 1935: 383 |