Sinoennea fartoidea ( Theobald, 1870 ) Páll-Gergely & Hunyadi & Grego & Sajan & Tripathy & Chen, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0083 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:83A57E5F-10AB-46EF-A35C-29B2E747851A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987F7-FFA3-4E05-FCCA-F8D6FDD938DC |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Sinoennea fartoidea ( Theobald, 1870 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Sinoennea fartoidea ( Theobald, 1870) View in CoL , new combination
( Figs. 1K, L View Fig , 15 View Fig , 22P View Fig )
Pupa fartoidea Theobald, 1870: 400 View in CoL .
Ennea (Huttonella) fartoides (sic) — Nevill, 1878: 7.
Pupa (Ennea) fartoides (sic) — Hanley & Theobald, 1876: 40, pl. 100, fig. 5.
Ennea (Indoennea) fartoidea — Kobelt, 1904b: 278, pl. 20, fig. 21.
Ennea fartoidea — W.T. Blanford & Godwin-Austen, 1908: 18.
Gulella fartoidea — Richardson, 1988: 81.
Type locality. “ Shan States ” .
Material examined. 1 shell, probable syntype ( NZSI M.33964/9), Shan States, coll. W. Theobald; 2 shells in separate vials (probably syntypes) ( NHMUK 1888.12.04.491– 2), Upper Salwin valley .
Remarks. Shell shape elongate ovoid with cylindrical sides and domed dorsal side. Upper whorls and last quarter whorl regularly ribbed, remaining ca. 2 last whorls with weak growth lines. Aperture subrectangular. Parietal callus distinct, not “smeared” onto preceding whorl, does not reach the middle of the preceding whorl. Apertural dentition 3-fold. Parietal lamella strong, elevated, straight, its inner end is not visible in oblique view to the aperture. Sinulus teardrop-shaped, opens slightly laterally, relatively small, and not conspicuously isolated due to the relatively weak palatal tooth. Palatal wall with two denticles. Upper one strong but blunt, situated on the peristome edge, lower one lower in position and deeper, very weak, only slightly indicated. No structure that would be homologous with the columellar lamella of other Sinoennea species is visible in oblique view to the aperture. The slight thickening on the columellar edge is homologous with the inner columellar edge of other Sinoennea species , and probably not homologous with the columellar lamella of other Sinoennea species (see Fig. 1B, K View Fig ). Peristome strongly thickened and expanded, not reflected, relatively weak around the sinulus. Basal swelling very slight, situated very close to peristome. There is a slight depression just behind the peristome on the outer side (corresponds with the upper palatal tooth). Inner (umbilical) side very short, without depression. Umbilical development not visible. Periumbilical keel moderate, but relatively clearly visible from umbilical view, especially due to the slight furrow on the outer side.
Most shell characters of the general shell shape and the apertural barriers agree with other Sinoennea species , therefore this species is moved to that genus. The absence of the columellar lamella ( Fig. 1K, L View Fig ) is surprising, and was not found in any other Sinoennea species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sinoennea fartoidea ( Theobald, 1870 )
Páll-Gergely, Barna, Hunyadi, András, Grego, Jozef, Sajan, Sheikh, Tripathy, Basudev & Chen, Zhe-Yu 2020 |
Gulella fartoidea
Richardson CL 1988: 81 |
Ennea fartoidea
Blanford WT & Godwin-Austen HH 1908: 18 |
Ennea (Indoennea) fartoidea
Kobelt W 1904: 278 |
Ennea (Huttonella) fartoides
Nevill G 1878: 7 |
fartoidea
Theobald W 1870: 400 |