Megaphyllum projectum Verhoff, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3741.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF5EA9B8-C6F4-448A-BEF9-1976AB4EC308 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6151708 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887D3-FFFE-FFB0-FF34-9801FF0BAE26 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megaphyllum projectum Verhoff, 1894 |
status |
|
Megaphyllum projectum Verhoff, 1894 View in CoL
Figs 4a–l View FIGURES 4 a – l
Diagnosis. M. projectum differs from all consubgeners by the longitudinal anterior process of the opisthomere (ap) (i.e. directed parallel to main opisthomere body, best seen from lateral view, see Fig. 4f View FIGURES 4 a – l ) together with the cockscomb-like posterior solenomere process (psp), best seen from mesal view ( Fig. 4k View FIGURES 4 a – l ).
The species shows sexual dimorphism in body colour: males are uniformly dark grey, while females are brownish-yellow with two bright dorsal bands divided by a wide dark band.
Remarks. Type species of the genus Megaphyllum and one of the most frequent Megaphyllum species in Central European deciduous forests. Originally, Verhoeff described five nominal subspecies: M. p. alticolum (Verhoeff, 1897), M. p. deubeli (Verhoeff, 1899) , M. p. dioritanum (Verhoeff, 1907) , M. p. kochi (Verhoeff, 1907) and the nominotypical subspecies M. p. projectum Verhoeff, 1894 . Their validity was discussed by Lazányi & Korsós (2011) where only three of them proved to be valid. This is the only species within the subgenus Megaphyllum sensu stricto for which valid subspecies are recognized. They are further discussed in separate sections.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Megaphyllum |