Ernstia multispiculata, Klautau, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1404B14-628E-4Eb4-9501-Ed6A0910C9Cb |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6010597 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C887A7-A82F-FFD7-FF7E-653AFAFDE780 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ernstia multispiculata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ernstia multispiculata View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 A–I; Table 12)
Diagnosis. Ernstia with white cormus formed by irregular and tightly anastomosed tubes. Skeleton with two size categories of triactines and tetractines. Actines are slightly conical or conical with sharp tips.
Material examined (One specimen). Holotype: UFRJPOR 6688, Barretinha , Rocas Atoll , Rio Grande do Norte State, 3 m depth, coll. A. Padua, 18 July 2011.
Etymology. In reference to the presence of several size categories of triactines and tetractines.
Colour. white in life and light beige in ethanol.
Morphology. The only specimen is small, with soft and fragile consistency. The cormus is composed of irregular and tightly anastomosed tubes ( Fig 11 View FIGURE 11 A). water-collecting tubes were not observed.
Anatomy. No cells with granules were present. The skeleton has no special organization and is composed of two size categories of both triactines and tetractines ( Fig 11 View FIGURE 11 B). Triactines and tetractines are present in the same proportion.
Spicules ( Figure 11 View FIGURE 11 ; Table 12). Triactine I. Equiangular and equiradiate. Actines are slightly conical, straight, with sharp tips ( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 C, D).
Specimen Spicule Length (µm) Width (µm) n Min mean sd max min mean sd max
UFRJPOR 6688 (H) Triactine I 78.3 122.6 24.1 162.0 6.8 11.7 2.8 18.9 35 Triactine II 175.5 205.2 17.91 226.8 8.1 20.9 4.8 27.0 17 Tetractine I 75.6 120.2 24.8 156.6 6.8 11.4 2.7 16.2 29 Apical 32.4 52.5 15.4 89.1 4.1 5.5 1.1 8.1 23 Tetractine II 170.1 207.2 19.5 253.8 17.6 20.9 2.1 24.3 30 Apical 27.0 54.2 15.3 94.5 4.1 5.3 0.4 5.4 30 Triactine II. Equiangular and equiradiate. Actines are conical, straight, with sharp tips ( Fig 11 View FIGURE 11 E).
Tetractine I. Equiangular and equiradiate. Actines are slightly conical, straight, with sharp tips ( Figs 16 View FIGURE 16 F, G). The apical actine is very thin, almost cylindrical, smooth and sharp ( Fig 11 View FIGURE 11 I).
Tetractine II. Equiangular and equiradiate. Actines are conical, straight, with sharp tips ( Fig 11 View FIGURE 11 H). The apical actine is very thin, slightly conical, smooth and sharp.
Ecology. The single specimen was collected in a small tide pool in Rocas Atoll, at 3 m of depth.
Distribution. Rocas Atoll, off NE Brazil.
Remarks. Including the new species described above, 11 species of Ernstia are recognized to date (see Remarks on the description of Ernstia citrea sp. nov.). The presence of more than one size category of triactine and of tetractine differentiates E. multispiculata sp. nov. from all the others. The new species shares its white colour with E. quadriradiata , E. tetractina and perhaps also with E. sagamiana , E. septentrionalis , and E. sueziana (whose colours alive are unknown; Hôzawa 1929; Rapp et al. 2001; Klautau & Valentine, 2003). The new species can be differentiated from E. quadriradiata , E. tetractina , and E. sagamiana by the proportion between triactines and tetractines. while in those known species of Ernstia , tetractines are much more abundant than triactines, in E. multispiculata sp. nov. they are equally abundant. The new species can be differentiated from E. sagamiana also by the presence of diactines only in the latter; and from E. septentrionalis by the absence of granular cells, and by its spicules with conical instead of cylindrical actines. It can be distinguished from E. sueziana by the cormus formed by loosely anatomosed tubes in that species, and by tightly anastomosed tubes in the new one.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |