Spariolenus Simon, 1880
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.277803 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6184001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C787F5-4E34-F031-EFA0-F8832E66FC01 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Spariolenus Simon, 1880 |
status |
|
Genus Spariolenus Simon, 1880 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species: Spariolenus tigris Simon, 1880 , by original designation from Calcutta ( India), redescribed and illustrated by Jäger (2001, 2006a).
Spariolenus Simon 1880: 281 View in CoL –282. Simon 1897a: 56; Simon 1897b: 253; Gravely 1931: 257, figs.13C–D; Sethi & Tikader 1988: 7, figs. 19–24; Jäger 2001: 9, figs. 2e, m–p, 14d, 15a–b; Jäger 2002: 58 –59; Jäger 2006a: 310, f. 12–15.
Extended diagnosis. Spariolenus View in CoL spp. can be distinguished from all other Heteropodinae by the number of ventral tibial spines: I–II 10, III 8 and IV 6 (usually I–IV 6 in other Heteropodinae, exception Heteropoda cyperusiria Barrion & Litsinger, 1995 View in CoL I–II 12, III 8, IV 6). Moreover, they can be recognized by a combination of characters of copulatory organs: male palp with blunt and short RTA in ventral view, conductor membranous (sheath-like in Heteropoda View in CoL spp.). Female epigynes are characterized by two spirally coiled copulatory openings (similar to those of Martensopoda Jäger, 2006 View in CoL ) but lacking posterior pit. The openings form two large semicircular rims ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 11 View FIGURES 11 – 19 , 20 View FIGURES 20 – 26 , 31 View FIGURES 31 – 38 ). In dorsal view, vulvae show three distinct windings parts. Glandular pores are situated on the third coils ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 12 View FIGURES 11 – 19 , 22 View FIGURES 20 – 26 , 32 View FIGURES 31 – 38 ).
Description. Medium to very large Heteropodinae (body length 8.5–31.0 mm), prosoma slightly longer than wide; leg length formula: 2143; eyes arranged in two rows and slightly recurved, lateral eyes larger than median eyes, PME larger than AME, PLE slightly larger or equal to ALE ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); chelicerae with three anterior and four to seven ( S. tigris ) posterior teeth, intermarginal denticles present ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 , 26 View FIGURES 20 – 26 ); strong male embolus running in prolateral loop partially within groove of tegulum ( Figs 8 View FIGURES 8 – 10 , 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ), membranous conductor small to well developed, cymbium longer than tibia, cymbium with retrolateral-basal bulge; RTA short and divided in a dorsal and ventral branch, dRTA and vRTA arising from broad conjoint base ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 8 – 10 , 28 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); female palpal claw with primary tooth distinctly longer than secondary teeth, 4–8 secondary teeth present; epigyne as in diagnosis with epigynal fields roundish or oval, with or without anterior bands, slit sense organs present, vulva as in diagnosis; colour is generally cream-brown or olive-brown with dark patterns on prosoma and opisthosoma and dark bands on the legs.
Species included: Spariolenus tigris Simon, 1880 ; S. secundus Jäger, 2006 ; S. aratta spec. nov.; S. iranomaximus spec. nov.; S. manesht spec. nov.; S. zagros spec. nov. It should be noted that Platnick (2011) listed three other species for which Jäger (2002) ascertained uncertain taxonomic status, they cannot be clearly assigned to the genus Spariolenus . For more details see Jäger (2002).
Distribution. Indian Peninsula (Calcutta), North-eastern Arabian Peninsula ( Oman), Iranian Plateau ( Zagros Mountains, Iran)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Spariolenus Simon, 1880
Moradmand, Majid & Jäger, Peter 2011 |
Spariolenus
Jager 2006: 310 |
Jager 2002: 58 |
Jager 2001: 9 |
Sethi 1988: 7 |
Gravely 1931: 257 |
Simon 1897: 56 |
Simon 1897: 253 |
Simon 1880: 281 |