Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3865.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA1F0F7D-25A3-4084-8F2C-99AF9A45DFCC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4667474 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C78780-885F-FFC6-FF00-FC1BFC8CF83C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) |
status |
|
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) View in CoL
Typhlodromus cucumeris Oudemans, 1930: 69 ; Nesbitt, 1951: 23; Hirschmann, 1962: 2; Spain & Luxton, 1971: 187.
Typhlodromus thripsi MacGill 1939: 310 . (synonymy by Evans, 1952: 416; Chant, 1959: 78; Schuster & Gonzalez, 1963: 185; Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 609; Schicha, 1976: 337; Chant et al., 1978: 1346).
Typhlodromus bellinus Womersley, 1954: 177 . (synonymy by Dosse, 1957: 307; Schuster & Gonzalez, 1963: 185; Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; Athias-Henriot, 1960a: 297; 1966: 207; Chant & Hansell, 1971: 721; Chant et al., 1978: 1346; not synonym, according to Schicha, 1976: 340).
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) cucumeris .— Chant, 1959: 78.
Amblyseius (Typhlodromopsis) cucumeris .— De Leon, 1959: 113.
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) cucumeris . — Wainstein, 1962b: 16; Ehara, 1966: 20; Ueckermann & Loots, 1988: 147.
Amblyseius cucumeris . — Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 277; El-Badry, 1970: 502; Livshitz & Kuznetsov, 1972: 25; Beglyarov, 1981: 39; Nasr & Abou-Awad, 1985: 246; Zaher, 1986: 111; Papadoulis & Emmanouel, 1991: 52; Swirski et al., 1998: 105.
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) cucumeris .— Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 609.
Amblyseius coprophilus Karg, 1970: 289 . (synonymy by Karg, 1971: 213; Chant & McMurtry, 2003: 21).
Neoseiulus cucumeris View in CoL . — Moraes et al., 1986: 76; 2004: 115; Beard, 2001: 103; Congdon, 2002: 23; Denmark & Edland, 2002: 211; Papadoulis et al., 2009: 79; Ramadan et al., 2009: 118; Ferragut et al., 2010: 84.
Female (two specimens).
Dorsal shield strongly reticulate; 351, 346 long and 182, 164 wide, with 17 pairs of setae. Setae j 1 18, 16; j 3 23, 21; j 4 13, 12; j 5 10, 9; j 6 13, 11; J 2 16, 14; J 5 13, 11; z 2 13, 12; z 4 13, 12; z 5 10, 8; Z 1 16, 15; Z 4 26, 24; Z5 60, 57; s 4 18, 17; S 2 21, 19; S 4 21, 19; S 5 26, 25; r 3 23, 21; R 1 21, 19. Dorsal setae smooth, except Z4 and Z5, slightly serrate. Peritreme extending forward to level of j3.
Venter. Sternal shield smooth with few lateral striae, with three pairs of setae and two pairs of lyrifissures. Distances between st1–st 1 33, 30; st2–st2 60, 58; st3–st3 65, 61; st4–st4 70, 68. Genital shield weakly striate; distance between st5–st5 68, 67. Ventrianal shield subpentagonal, reticulate; 117, 107 long, 96, 88 wide at ZV2 level and 81, 75 wide at level of anus; with three pairs of pre-anal setae and a pair of pre-anal pores. Seta JV5 39, 38. Ventral setae smooth, except JV5, slightly serrate. Two pairs of metapodal plates.
Spermatheca. Calyx of spermatheca saccular, 10, 9 long; atrium distinct.
Gnathosoma. Corniculi slightly convergent distally; basal width of corniculus 4, distance between bases of corniculi 8. Movable cheliceral digit 31, 30 long, with one tooth; fixed digit 29, 28 long, with three teeth.
Legs. Macroseta sharp-tipped: Sge IV 34, 33; Sti IV 33, 32; St IV 49, 44; chaetotaxy of genu II 2, 2/0, 2/0, 1; genu III 1, 2/1, 2/0, 1.
Specimens examined. Two females from mango leaves, at the Faculty of Agriculture Farm, Cairo University, Giza governorate, June 1980 (coll. M.A. Zaher).
Previous records from Egypt. Fayoum governorate ( Romeih et al., 2010b); Giza governorate (Zaher & El- Badry, 1962; El-Badry, 1970; Zaher, 1986; Romeih et al., 2010b); unspecified governorate ( Chant, 1959).
Remarks. Neoseiulus cucumeris was originally described from the holotype female collected in France. The original description was brief, only with measurements of the idiosoma and no illustration; complementary descriptions were listed by Demite et al. (2014). Our measurements are close to those reported by Zaher (1986) for a single female, except s4 (40 according to that author).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans)
Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. & De, Gilberto J. 2014 |
Neoseiulus cucumeris
Ferragut 2010: 84 |
Papadoulis 2009: 79 |
Ramadan 2009: 118 |
Congdon 2002: 23 |
Denmark 2002: 211 |
Beard 2001: 103 |
Moraes 1986: 76 |
Amblyseius coprophilus
Chant 2003: 21 |
Karg 1971: 213 |
Karg 1970: 289 |
Amblyseius cucumeris
Swirski 1998: 105 |
Papadoulis 1991: 52 |
Zaher 1986: 111 |
Nasr 1985: 246 |
Beglyarov 1981: 39 |
Livshitz 1972: 25 |
El-Badry 1970: 502 |
Schuster 1963: 277 |
Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) cucumeris
Westerboer 1963: 609 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) cucumeris
Ueckermann 1988: 147 |
Ehara 1966: 20 |
Wainstein 1962: 16 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) cucumeris
Chant 1959: 78 |
Amblyseius (Typhlodromopsis) cucumeris
De 1959: 113 |
Typhlodromus bellinus
Schicha 1976: 340 |
Chant 1971: 721 |
Schuster 1963: 185 |
Schuster 1963: 277 |
Athias-Henriot 1960: 297 |
Dosse 1957: 307 |
Womersley 1954: 177 |
Typhlodromus thripsi
Schicha 1976: 337 |
Schuster 1963: 185 |
Schuster 1963: 277 |
Westerboer 1963: 609 |
Chant 1959: 78 |
Evans 1952: 416 |
MacGill 1939: 310 |
Typhlodromus cucumeris
Spain 1971: 187 |
Hirschmann 1962: 2 |
Nesbitt 1951: 23 |
Oudemans 1930: 69 |