Lepthyphantes biospeleologorum Barrientos, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a1 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D14C124B-4CB6-4097-95F9-CACECBE4C844 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4327711 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C5C956-7075-FFC4-FF06-FDDA05D8FBCE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepthyphantes biospeleologorum Barrientos |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lepthyphantes biospeleologorum Barrientos View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 3 View FIG ; 13C, D View FIG )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:87BA13BB-23F2-41C3-B5AA-1C7B1A5C6992
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Morocco. 1♀; Ifri Bouyzem, Aglefth, Taglefth, Azilal; 15.V.2004; F. Fadrique leg.; MZB 2017-0660 View Materials .
Paratypes. Morocco. 2♀; same locality and date as the holotype; MZB 2017-0661 View Materials .
OTHER MATERIAL. — Morocco. 4 juv.; same locality and date as the holotype; MZB 2017-0662 View Materials .
DIAGNOSIS. — The epigyne is broad and small, protruding on the ventral side of the epigastrum. The bursa copulatrix has a very short front edge; the lateral edges expand and separate to accommodate the scape; the posterior wall differentiates a median plate, narrow in the center and rounded on the sides. The proscape is wide and flattened, with rounded contour and a notch in the anterior part; a short and rounded strecher in the distal part of the scape, but flanked by two rounded expansions. By the morphology of its epigyne (and without information on the male copulatory bulb) this species has some affinities with L. brevihamatus , L. longihamatus and, in general, with the entire “ afer group”, in which probably it should be placed.
ETYMOLOGY. — This species is dedicated, in a general way, to all the biospeleologists. Anonymously they use part of their time to develop an exciting and hard (sometimes risky) activity, in pursuit of the forms that inhabit the caverns. Without their generous dedication, this small job would not have been possible.
DISTRIBUTION. — This species is exclusively known from the type locality.
DESCRIPTION
Female (holotype)
Body. Total body length 2.30. Carapace: 0.93 long by 0.83 wide; yellowish brown color, and with a tenuous pigmentary pattern formed by five radial gray bands and one marginal in thoracic area. Cephalic part with some scattered hairs. Eyes developed and well pigmented; arranged in two transversal lines, with individual black areolas in each eye. Chelicerae: 0,39 long; coloration slightly more intense than the carapace; with three equidistant teeth on the promargin, the basal one somewhat smaller; retromargin unarmed. Legs long and thin; brown color, like the caparace; coloration gradually lost from the tibia towards apex. Measurements: leg I (1.47 + 0.27 + 1.57 + 1.35 + 0.86), leg II (1.30 + 0.29 + 1.22 + 1.27 + 0.83), leg III (1.00 + 0.27 + 0.98 + 0.91 + 0.64), and leg IV (1.37 + 0.29 + 1.20 + 1.27 + 0.93). Opisthosoma 1.42 long by 1.00 wide; gray-white color, without dorsal pattern, but entirely covered with a fine hairiness.
Female genitalia. Epigyne ( Figs 3 View FIG ; 13C, D View FIG ) with a transverse development, protruding little in ventral side of epigastrum. Its basal part showing a wide bursa copulatrix, with a very short anterior wall; lateral walls expanding and separate to accommodate the scape; posterior wall wide and reinforced by a sclerotized median plate, narrowed in the center and rounded on the sides. Anterior and lateral walls with a thick, sparse and well-arched hairiness. Scape starting from the anterior part of the bursa, and with a wide and flat proscape, rounded on the sides and with a notch on its distal part (connecting with the middle part); fertilization ducts visible in submarginal position. Median part of scape inflected and hidden under the proscape; the distal part, tourning towards it again, dilating and showing below the proscape; strecher short and rounded, but flanked by two rounded expansions. Distal part usually curved outwards, so that its distal part approaches the proscape.
Male
Unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Micronetinae |
Genus |