Rhamphothrips amyae, Mound, Laurence A. & Tree, Desley J., 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.276839 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6194545 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C587B6-FFED-513C-20FB-A69AFDB7FDD1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhamphothrips amyae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhamphothrips amyae View in CoL sp. n.
Female macroptera. Body and legs yellow, with extreme apex of tergum X brown; antennal segments I–IV clear yellow ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ), V–VIII dark brown; forewings pale. Head small, three pairs of ocellar and two pairs of postocular setae scarcely longer than setae on compound eyes; ocellar setae III between anterior margins of hind ocelli ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ); mouth cone extending to forecoxae. Pronotum ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ) about as wide as long, narrowed to anterior, surface with little or no sculpture; posterior margin with about 6 pairs of setae, one pair of posteroangular setae slightly prominent. Mesonotal anterior campaniform sensilla present, median setae about one third of sclerite length from posterior margin, lateral pair stout. Metanotal median setae not at anterior margin, campaniform sensilla present; median area with irregular and narrow longitudinal reticulation but striate laterally. Fore tibia with two moderately stout apical setae but no tooth. Forewing slender; first vein with about 7 setae basally, 3 widely spaced setae on distal half; second vein with 4 setae; clavus with 5 veinal and one discal setae. Prosternal basantra weakly sclerotised, ferna curved forwards medially; meso and metafurca without median spinula. Abdominal terga II–VIII with weak transverse reticulation, posterior margins with broad unlobed craspedum; paired campaniform sensilla on II–VII posterior to small, widely spaced median setae; X with median split almost complete. Sterna II–VI with broadly lobed craspedum, absent medially on VII; median two pairs of setae on VII elongate.
Measurements (paratype female in microns). Body length 1160. Head, dorsal length 65; width across eyes 100; ventral length to tip of mouth cone of paratype female 195. Pronotum, length 135; maximum width 125; posteroangular major seta 30. Forewing length 520. Ovipositor length 215. Antennal segments III–VIII length 35, 32, 32, 40, 7, 10.
Male macroptera. Similar to female, but antennal segment IV weakly shaded. Fore tibia with well-developed apical tubercle ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ), fore coxa without tubercle; craspedum on tergum II unlobed, on III–VIII with large, laterally pointing, teeth but median area unlobed ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ); tergum IX medially with pair of fine setae arising from slightly separated small tubercles, with no microtrichia laterally; sternum IX with transverse band of microtrichia. Measurements (holotype male in microns). Body length 900. Head, ventral length to tip of mouth cone 150. Pronotum, length 125; posteroangular major seta 15. Forewing length 450. Antennal segments III–VIII length 30, 30, 28, 38, 7, 10.
Material studied. Holotype male, Australia, Queensland, Carnarvon Station Reserve, from Callistemon shoots, iv.2007 (A. Wells 5/07).
Paratypes: Queensland, 9 females, 2 males taken with holotype; Queensland, Brisbane, Sherwood, 1 female from Acacia sp., 14.iii.2002.
Comments. The females of R. amyae are similar to those of an Indian species, R. parviceps Hood , in lacking any fore tibial tooth. However, in the Indian species the median setae (S1) on sternum VII are much smaller than setae S2. The females of R. amyae are closely similar to those of R. cissus in structure. They differ as follows: antennal segments V–VIII uniformly brown; mouth cone shorter, not extending beyond fore coxae; pronotum with no lines of sculpture and discal setae weak ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ); metanotum with more closely spaced lines medially; ovipositor shorter. The males are also similar to those of cissus , but the lateral tergal teeth are much more prominent and occur on terga III–VIII ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15 – 23 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |