Amaranthus flavus var. bernhardi Moquin-Tandon (1849: 258)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.273.2.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C51A48-1B04-301B-3C8C-FA00E1E4FEDF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amaranthus flavus var. bernhardi Moquin-Tandon (1849: 258) |
status |
|
12. Amaranthus flavus var. bernhardi Moquin-Tandon (1849: 258) View in CoL
Type: not designated.
Nomenclatural notes and taxonomic remarks:—The taxon bernhardi is one of the three varieties recognized by Moquin-Tandon (1849: 258) under Am. flavus . A short diagnosis (“foliis anguste lanceolatis subdistantibus, paniculis minoribus”) and the citation “ Amaranthus Bernhardi in hort. Taurin!” were given. No specimens, which can be considered as part of the original material, were traced neither in the herbarium TO [Moquin-Tandon (l.c.) reported in the prologue “hort. Taurin!” (= Hortus Taurinesis), L. Guglielmone pers. comm.], nor in other collections. As a consequence a neotypification is required under the Art. 9.7 of the ICN. There is a difficult in the designation of a neotype for the name Am. flavus var. bernhardi for at least the following reasons:
1) no specimens, which can be referred to Am. flavus and seen by Moquin-Tandon, were found;
2) no citations of Am. flavus var. bernhardi were traced in literature (neglected name);
3) it is very difficult to understand the Moquin-Tandon’s concept of the var. bernhardi since the author described the new taxon on the basis of morphological characters (habitus, leaves shape, and size of synflorescences) which have not or or have very low taxonomic value in Amaranthus (see e.g., Mosyakin & Robertson 2003, Iamonico 2015);
4) the name Am. flavus , which is currently to be referred to Am. cruentus , was differently interpreted along the time (see the discussion by Iamonico 2015 a) and the description by Moquin-Tandon (1849: 258) is not clear ascribable to both A. hybridus and A. cruentus .
All things stated, I prefer to avoid a neotype designation for Am. flavus var. bernhardi and hope for a future rejection of this name, which if used, it would cause a disadvantageous nomenclatural change (Art. 56 of the ICN).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.